Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1902 Cases
226 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Bankers' Mutual Casualty Co. v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
No. 509. Bankers’ Mutual Casualty Company, Petitioner, v. Minneapolis, St. Paul and Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company. December 22, 1902. ■ Mr. Horatio F. Hale and Mr. William Connor for the petitioner. No appearance for the respondent.
Pam-to-pee v. United States
PAM-TO-PEE v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OE CLAIMS. No. 211. Argued October 22, 23, 1902. Decided December 22, 1902. Where Congress has passed an act giving the Court of Claims jurisdiction over the claims of certain Indians again
Burt v. Union Central Life Insurance
BURT v. UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 70. Argued November 6, 1902. Decided December 22, 1902. As public policy forbids tbe insertion in a contract of a condition
Layton v. Missouri
LAYTON v. MISSOURI. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 69. Submitted November 6, 1902. Decided December 22, 1902. Where- the record does not show that it was contended in the state court that a state law under which th
Cuningham v. Metropolitan Lumber Co.
No. 176. Walter A. Cuningham et al. Petitioners, v. Metropolitan Lumber Company. December 15, 1902. Mr. F. O. Clark for the petitioners. Mr. B. J. Brown and Mr. JD. H. Ball fox the respondent.
Wilkinson v. Owens
No. 338. Ernest Wilkinson, Petitioner, v. William Dunlap Owens, Administrator, etc. December 8, 1902. Mr. Samuel Maddox for the petitioner. Mr. Clarence R. Wilson for the respondent.
Siegel v. Swarts
No. 438. Ferdinand Siegel et al., Appellants, v. S. L. Swarts, Trustee. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Motion to dismiss. Submitted December 1, 1902. Decided December 8, 1902. Mr. Edward C. El
Iowa Life Insurance v. Lewis
IOWA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. LEWIS. ERROR TO THE, CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHEN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 53. Argued October 21, 22, 1902. Decided December 8, 1902. 1. As the delivery of a policy of insurance and the pay
Elliott v. Toeppner
ELLIOTT v. TOEPPNER. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COTTRT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH circuit. No. 85. Submitted November 12, 1902. Decided December 8, 1902. The right of a person, against whom an involuntary petition of bankruptcy has been fil
Knights Templars' & Masons' Life Indemnity Co. v. Jarman
KNIGHTS TEMPLARS’ AND MASONS’ LIFE INDEMNITY COMPANY v. JARMAN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOE THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 48. Argued October 17, 1902. Decided December 8, 1902. 1. That section of the Revised Statutes of Missour
Vanderbilt v. Coler
No. 110. William K. Vanderbilt et al., Trustees et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Bird S. Coler, Comptroller, etc. December 1, 1902. Mr. Chandler P. Anderson for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Jdbish Holmes, Jr., for the defendant in error.
United States v. Moseley
UNITED STATES v. MOSELEY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 248. Argued October 28, 1902. Decided December 1, 1902. ■ The Secretary of the Interstate Commerce Commission is -entitled to be reimbursed- for. telegrams sent by him pursuant
Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. United States
FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 381. Submitted October 31, 1902. Decided December 1, 1902. I. This court has already sustained the power of the Suprem
Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown
EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY v. BROWN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORT OF HAWAII. No. 320. Submitted October 20, 1902. Decided December 1, 1902. The jurisdiction to review judgments or decrees of the courts of the Territory
Cherokee Nation v. Hitchcock
CHEROKEE NATION v. HITCHCOCK. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF. APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 340. Submitted October 23, 1902. Decided December 1, 1902. In an a'ction brought by the Cherokee Nation to enjoin the Secretary of the Interior
Lawder v. Stone
LAWDER v. STONE, COLLECTOR. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS EOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 82. Submitted November 11, 1902. Decided December 1, 1902. Section 23 of the Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, permitting importer
Evans v. Nellis
EVANS v. NELLIS. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 66. Argued November 4, 1902. Decided December 1, 1902. The statutory liability of stockholders of corporations (other than railway, religious or char
Northern Central Railway Co. v. Maryland
NORTHERN CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY v. MARYLAND. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 43. Argued October 16, 1902. Decided December 1, 1902. 1. When a Maryland corporation, chartered in 1827, and possessing certain immun
Mencke v. Cargo of Java Sugar
MENCKE v. CARGO OF JAVA SUGAR. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND circuit. No. 90. Argued November 13, 1902. Decided December 1, 1902. Where the charter party of a vessel bound with a cargo of sugar from Java, to a po
Macfarland v. Byrnes
MACFARLAND v. BYRNES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 332. Argued November 5, 1902. Decided December 1, 1902. A decree of tlie Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia reversing an order of the Supreme
Macfarland v. Brown
MACFARLAND v. BROWN. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 331. Argued November 5, 1902. Decided December 1, 1902. A judgment or decree to be final, within the meaning of that term as used in the acts of Congress
Security Trust Co. v. Dent
SECURITY TRUST COMPANY v. DENT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 42. Argued April 21, 22, 1902. Decided December 1, 1902. Where a case is originally brought to this court by writ of error, but it appear
Security Trust Co. v. Black River National Bank
SECURITY TRUST COMPANY v. BLACK RIVER NATIONAL BANK. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS EOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 39. Argued April 21, 22, 1902. Decided December 1, 1902. Under the statutes of the State of Minnesota and the decisi
Grin v. Shine
GRIN v. SHINE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 303. Submitted November 3, 1902. Decided December 1, 1902. Extradition treaties should be faithfully observed and interpreted wit
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.