Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1913 Cases
359 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Evans v. United States
EVANS v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 65. Argued December 5, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. In this case held that'the appointment of one holding a government position as special disbursing agent was not an appointmen
Thompson v. Thompson
THOMPSON v. THOMPSON. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 45. Argued November 8, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. Notwithstanding the obligation to make continuing payments for. maintenance of a wife and children
Bunker Hill & Sullivan Mining & Concentrating Co. v. United States
BUNKER HILL & SULLIVAN MINING AND CONCENTRATING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 101. Submitted December 17, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. Until it is finally determined that a home
Plumley v. United States
PLUMLEY v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. PLUMLEY. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Nos. 35, 36. Argued December 9, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. Where a contract for Government work provides that in case of discrepancies between the spe
United States v. Patten
UNITED STATES v. PATTEN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 282. Argued November 9, 10, 1911; reargued October 23, 24, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. On appeal undér the Criminal Appea
McNamara v. Henkel
McNAMARA v. HENKEL, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 687. Argued December 4, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. Under § 5
Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Latta
CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS AND OMAHA RAILWAY COMPANY v. LATTA. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 231. Argued March 8, 11, 1912; reargued October 22, 23, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. Decided on auth
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Miller
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY v. MILLER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. No. 17. Argued March 8, 1912; reargued October 22, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. Adams Express Company v. Groninger, ante, p. 491,
Adams Express Co. v. Croninger
ADAMS EXPRESS COMPANY v. CRONINGER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF KENTON COUNTY, STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 18. Argued March 13, 1912; reargued October 23, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. The constitutional power of Congress to regulate commerce
Wheeler v. United States
WHEELER v. UNITED STATES. SHAW v. UNITED STATES. WHEELER v. MURCHIE, UNITED STATES MARSHAL. SHAW v. SAME. ERROR TO AND APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Nos. 658, 659, 660, 661. Submitte
United States v. Union Pacific Railroad
UNITED STATES v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. MOTION AS TO FORM OF MANDATE. No. 446. Submitted December 19, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. Each case under the Sherman Act must stand upon its own facts and this court will not regard the m
Ewing v. City of Leavenworth
EWING v. CITY OF LEAVENWORTH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 66. Argued December 6, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. A license tax on express companies for receiving arid sending packages to and from points within the
Kalanianaole v. Smithies
KALANIANAOLE v. SMITHIES, TRUSTEE OF COCKETT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII. No. 109. Argued December 20, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. On a pure matter of form as to the parties in a suit coming here from a court o
Marshall Dental Manufacturing Co. v. Iowa
MARSHALL DENTAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. STATE OF IOWA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. No. 104. Argued December 19, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. Qucere: Whether this court can go behind successive findings of the Secreta
Pittsburg Steel Co. v. Baltimore Equitable Society
PITTSBURG STEEL COMPANY v. BALTIMORE EQUITABLE SOCIETY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 103. Argued December 18, 19, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. A state statute changing.a remedy for enforcing contract rights
Ubeda v. Zialcita
UBEDA v. ZIALCITA. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 77. Submitted December 6, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. One, whose registered trade-mark is manifestly an imitation of an earlier but unregistered trade-mark,
Illinois ex rel. Gersch v. City of Chicago
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS EX REL. GERSCH, v. CITY OF CHICAGO ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 474. Submitted December 16, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. Where the record does not contain the final judgme
Preston v. City of Chicago
PRESTON v. CITY OF CHICAGO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 195. Submitted December 16, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. Whether a state officer is -within the classified service and not subject to removal under the C
Illinois Central Railroad v. Henderson Elevator Co.
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. HENDERSON ELEVATOR COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 105. Argued December 19, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. Failure to post rates does not estop the carrier from colle
Anderson v. Smith
ANDERSON, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. SMITH. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 91. Argued December 17, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. The. evidence in this case not showing that the injury suffered by the servant was cau
Hannum v. United States
HANNUM v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 30. Argued December 9, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. The assimilating clause of § 13 of the Navy Personnel Act of 1899 applies only to officers on the active list and does not r
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Hardwick Farmers Elevator Co.
CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. HARDWICK FARMERS ELEVATOR COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 25. Argued November 25, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. By the Hepburn Act of June 29, 1906, 34 St
Ex parte United States
EX PARTE UNITED STATES, PETITIONER. PETITION FOR WRIT OF PROHIBITION. No. 10, Original. Submitted December 16, 1912. Decided January 6, 1913. Unless the repeal be express or the implication to that end be irresistible, a general law does no
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.