Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1914 Cases
315 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Lapina v. Williams
LAPINA v. WILLIAMS, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 7. Submitted December 1, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. The authority of Congress over the admission of aliens to the Un
United States v. Buchanan
UNITED STATES v. BUCHANAN. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 589. Argued December 3, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. The term, “ Public lands subject to settlement or entry,” does not include
National Safe Deposit Co. v. Stead
NATIONAL SAFE DEPOSIT COMPANY v. STEAD, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 138. Argued December 16, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. The word “possession” is more or less ambigu
Swift v. McPherson
SWIFT v. McPHERSON ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 77. Argued November 14, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. While there may be a presumption that a dismissal in equity without qualifying words is a final decision
United States v. Regan
UNITED STATES v. REGAN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 503. Argued October 22, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. While in strictly criminal prosecutions the jury may not return ar verdict against the def
Platt v. City of New York
PLATT, TREASURER OF UNITED STATES EXPRESS COMPANY, v. CITY OF NEW YORK. CITY OF NEW YORK v. PLATT, TREASURER OF UNITED STATES EXPRESS COMPANY. APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN' DISTRICT OF
Barrett v. City of New York
BARRETT, PRESIDENT OF ADAMS EXPRESS CO., v. CITY OF NEW YORK. CITY OF NEW YORK v. BARRETT, PRESIDENT OF ADAMS EXPRESS CO. APPEAL AND CROSS-APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. Nos. 83, 84
Hawley v. City of Malden
HAWLEY v. CITY OF MALDEN. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE STATE . OP , MASSACHUSETTS. No. 18. Argued March 6, 7, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. The property of shareholders in their respective shares is distinct from the corporate proper
Parker-Washington Co. v. Cramer
No. 449. Parker-Washington Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Harold Cramer, a Minor, etc. In error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. Motion to dismiss or affirm, etc., submitted December 22, 191
Radford v. Myers
RADFORD v. MYERS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MICHIGAN. No. 251. Submitted December 3, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. Whether due effect was given by the state court to a judgment rendered in the Circuit Court of the United S
Cameron v. United States
CAMERON v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 165. Argued October 21, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. The estate of the bankrupt is in process of administration after the petition has been f
Rainey v. W. R. Grace & Co.
RAINEY v. W. R. GRACE & COMPANY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 119. Submitted December 9, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. A statute, the evident purpose of which is to save expense in litigation, wi
United States v. Moist
UNITED STATES v. MOIST. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 378. Submitted October 22, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. 'Where it does not appear that the judgment sustaining a demurrer
Hobbs v. Head & Dowst Co.
HOBBS v. HEAD AND DOWST COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 148. Argued December 18, 19, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. Even though contractors may not be entitled to a mechanics’ lien under the stat
Piza Hermanos v. Caldentey
PIZA HERMANOS v. CALDENTEY. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP PORTO RICO. No. 134. Submitted December 15, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. Where the principle on which the amount recovered is based is admitted, this court will not go behind we
Trimble v. City of Seattle
TRIMBLE v. CITY OF SEATTLE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 108. Argued December 9, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. The state court having declared the policy of the State as excluding a constructive obligation to
Tinker v. Midland Valley Mercantile Co.
TINKER v. MIDLAND VALLEY MERCANTILE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA. No. 13. Submitted October 30, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. Under the provision in the Indian Appropriation Act of June 21, 1906, c. 3504, 34
Pennell v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.
PENNELL, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. PHILADELPHIA & READING RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD .CIRCUIT. No. 469. Argued December 3, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. Queers, and not decided on this record, whether the
Mulcrevy, & Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. City & County of San Francisco
MULCREVY, AND FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 133. Argued December 12, 15, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. An act of a State will not be construed i
United States v. Antikamnia Chemical Co.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTIKAMNIA CHEMICAL COMPANY. ERROR TO AND APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 118. Argued December 9, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. Where the validity of regulations made by officer
City of Louisville v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.
CITY OF LOUISVILLE v. CUMBERLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP KENTUCKY. No. 538. Argued November 10, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. Decided on authority of
In re Engelhard & Sons Co.
IN RE ENGELHARD & SONS COMPANY, PETITIONER. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND RULE. No. 12, Original. Argued November 10, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. In a suit by á public utility corporation to enjoin, enforcement of rates claimed to be
In re City of Louisville
IN RE CITY OF LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY, PETITIONER. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. No. 11, Original. Argued November 10, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. The mandate in the case of Louisville v. Cumberland. Telephone Co., 225 U. S. 430, in which
Pennington v. United States
PENNINGTON v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 582. Submitted December 15, 1913. Decided January 5, 1914. The proviso in the back pay and bounty provision in the Sundry Civil Appropriation Act of March 4, 1907, c. 2918, 3
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.