Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1930 Cases
326 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Sherman & Ellis, Inc. v. Indiana Mutual Casualty Co.
No. 553. Sherman & Ellis, Inc., v. Indiana Mutual Casualty Co. December 15, 1930. Mr. John R. Cochran for petitioner. Messrs. Charles 0. Roemler, William H. Thompson, and Albert L. Rahb for respondent.
Wing v. Philippine Railway Co.
No. 307. Wing v. Philippine Railway Co. December 15, 1930. Mr. Wrn. J. Rohde for petitioner. Mr. Richard H. Wilmer for respondent.
Broad River Power Co. v. South Carolina ex rel. Daniel
BROAD RIVER POWER COMPANY et al. v. SOUTH CAROLINA ex rel. DANIEL, ATTORNEY GENERAL. No. 528 (1929 Term). Argued on Rehearing, December 3, 4, 1930.— Decided December 15, 1930. See 281 U. S. 537. Mr. George M. LePine, with whom Messrs. C. Ed
Powers-Kennedy Contracting Corp. v. Concrete Mixing & Conveying Co.
POWERS-KENNEDY CONTRACTING CORPORATION et al. v. CONCRETE MIXING AND CONVEYING COMPANY. CONCRETE MIXING AND CONVEYING COMPANY v. R. C. STORRIE & COMPANY. Nos. 3 and 4. Argued April 16, 17, 1929. Reargued October 24,-1930. Decided December 1
Wright & Taylor, Inc. v. Lucas
No. 565. Wright & Taylor, Inc., v. Lucas, Collector of Internal Revenue. December 8, 1930. Messrs. Donald V. Hunter and Robert N. Miller for petitioner. Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Youngguist and Messrs. Claude R.
Weston v. Beaver-Remmers-Graham Co.
No. 30. Weston v. Beaver-Remmers-Graham Co. et al. Argued December 5, 1930. Decided December 8, 1930. Mr. Guy H. Wells argued the cause and Messrs. Wellmore B. Turner and E. H. .Turner filed a brief for appellants. Messrs. Murray Segsongood
Wall v. Bankers Life Co.
No. 25. Wall et al. v. Bankers Life Co. Argued December 4, 1930. Decided December 8, 1930. Mr. Louis H. Salinger, with whom Messrs. Howard L. Bump, Francis G. Ryan, James M. Parsons, John M. Stewart, W. H. Keating, Clarence I. Spencer, and
Petty v. Georgia
No. 500. Petty v. Georgia. Jurisdictional statement submitted December 1, 1930. Decided December 8, 1930. Mr. Benjamin E. Pierce for appellant. Messrs. George M. Napier and T. R. Gress for appellee.
Wampler v. Lecompte
WAMPLER v. LECOMPTE, STATE GAME WARDEN, et al. No. 402. Argued-November 25, 1930. Decided December 8, 1930. Mr. Thomas Morris Wampler, pro se. Messrs. Robert H. Archer and William L. .Marbury, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General of Maryland, w
Lektophone Corp. v. Rola Co.
LEKTOPHONE CORPORATION v. THE ROLA COMPANY. MILLER BROTHERS COMPANY v. LEKTOPHONE CORPORATION. Nos. 19 and 68. Argued November 26, 1930. Decided December 8, 1930. Mr. William H. Davis for the Lektophone Corporation. Mr. Thomas G. Haight, wi
American Surety Co. v. Cove Irrigation District
No. 534. American Surety Co. v. Cove Irrigation District. December 1, 1930. Mr. Sterling M. Wood for petitioner. Mr. Horace S. Davis for respondent.
Weidenfeld v. Pacific Steamship Co.
No. 528. Weidenfeld v. Pacific Steamship Co. December 1, 1930. Mr. C. C. Daniels for petitioner.. Messrs. Arthur H. Van Brunt, Welles V. Moot, and H. Z. M. Rodgers for respondent.
Brunton v. Burnet
No. 509. Brunton, Executrix, v. Burnet, Commissioner of Internal Revenue. December 1, 1930. Mr. Minor Moore for petitioner. Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney, General Youngquist and Messrs. Claude R. Branch, Sew-all Key, A. H. C
Spruill v. Buck
No. 559. Spruill v. Buck. December 1, 1930. Georgia M. Spruill, pro se. No appearance for respondent.
Latshaw v. Missouri ex rel. Kansas City Public Service Co.
No. 467. Latshaw, Judge, v. Missouri ex rel. Kansas City Public Service Co. Jurisdictional statement submitted November 24, -1930. Decided December 1, 1930. Mr. Marcy K. Brown, Jr., for appellant. Messrs. Robert W. Otto, Richard J. Higgins,
Ex parte Harper
No. 23, original. Ex parte Harper et al. Submitted November 24, 1930. Decided December 1, 1930. -Messrs. Henry J. Balzer and Charles T. Coleman for petitioners. See post, p. 810.
Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Holmberg
CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & OMAHA RAILWAY COMPANY v. HOLMBERG. No. 1. Argued October 10, 1928. Reargued October 23, 1930.— Decided December 1, 1930. Mr'. Wymer Dressier, with whom Messrs. Robert D: Neely, Richard L. Kennedy, and R. N.
Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.
SMITH et al., CONSTITUTING THE ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION, et al. v. ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY. No. 90. Argued October 20, 21, 1930. Decided December 1, 1930. See also, 269 U. S. 531. • Messrs. George I. Haight and Benjamin F. Golds
Aetna Life Ins. v. Eaton
No. 511. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Eaton, Collector of Internal Revenue. November 24, 1930. Messrs. William Marshall Bul-litt and Harry W. Reynolds for petitioner. Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Youngquist and Messrs. Cl
Tomplain v. United States
No. 501. Tomplain et al. v. United States. November 24, 1930. Mr. Hugh M. Wilkinson for petitioners. Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Youngquist and Messrs. Claude R. Branch, A. W. Henderson, and Paul D. Miller for the
Jennings v. Anderson
No. 529. Jennings, Executrix, v. Anderson, Collector. November 24, 1930. Messrs. Robert N. Miller, Ewing Everett and J. Robert Sherrod for petitioner. Solicitor General Thacker, Assistant Attorney General Young-quist and Messrs. Claude R. B
United States v. Macintosh
No. 504. United States v. Macintosh. November 24, 1930. Solicitor General Thacher and Messrs. Harry S. Ridgely and Paul D. Miller for the United States. Mr. John. W. Davis for respondent.
Enameled Metals Co. v. Burnet
No. 489. Enameled Metals Co. v. Burnet, Commissioner of Internal Revenue. November 24, 1930. Messrs. S. Leo Ruslander, Samuel Kaufman, Clarence N. Goodwin, and George R. Beneman for petitioner. Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney
Group No. 1, Oil Corp. v. Bass
No. 425. Group No. 1, Oil Corp. v. Bass, Collector of Internal Revenue. November 24, 1930. Messrs. Homer L. Bruce and James A. Baker for petitioner. Solicitor Gen-erad Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Youngguist and Messrs. Claude R. Bra
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.