Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1931 Cases
302 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Milliken v. United States
MILLIKEN et al., EXECUTORS, v. UNITED STATES. No. 87. Argued January 29, 1931. Decided March 2, 1931. Mr. D. A. Embury, with whom Mr. Hugo Kohlmann was on the brief, for petitioners. Assistant Attorney General Rugg, with whom Solicitor Gene
American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Brogdex Co.
AMERICAN FRUIT GROWERS, INCORPORATED, v. BROGDEX CO. No. 48. Argued January 9, 12, 1931. Decided March 2, 1931. Messrs. W. Brown Morton and R. T. M. McCready, with whom Mr. George E. Middleton was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Charles N
United States v. Minnesota
No. 7, original; United States v. Minnesota. February 25, 1931. . Mr. Charles R. Pierce for defendant.
Chasm Power Co. v. Chateaugay
No. 629. Chasm Power Co. et al. v. Chateaugay. February 25, 1931. •Mr. Frank Irvine for petitioners. Mr. Patrick J. Tierney for respondent.
Fritzinger v. Illinois
No. 591. Fritzinger v. Illinois et al. Jurisdictional statement submitted February 2, 1931. Decided February 25, 1931. Mr. Henry Fritzinger, pro se. Messrs. Oscar E. Carlstrom and Russell 0. Hanson for appellees.
Smith v. Magic City Kennel Club, Inc.
SMITH, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. MAGIC CITY KENNEL CLUB, INCORPORATED, et al. No. 77. Argued January 28, 1931. Decided February 25, 1931. Mr. E. Howard McCaleb for petitioner. Mr. Arthur C. Brown for respondents.
Abie State Bank v. Bryan
ABIE STATE BANK v. BRYAN, GOVERNOR OF NEBRASKA, et al. No. 63. Argued January 22, 23, 1931. Decided February 25, 1931. Messrs. Leonard A. Flansburg and Frank H. Gaines, with whom Mr. S. S. Sidner was on the brief, for appellant. Messrs. C.
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. United States
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 517. Argued January 16, 1931. Decided February 25, 1931. Mr. Samuel W. Moore, with whom Messrs. Frank H. Moore and Cyrus Crane were on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Da
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United States
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 333. Argued January 15, 16, 1931. Decided February 25, 1931. Mr. Alfred P. Thom, with whom Messrs. Edward S. Jouett, R. V. Fletcher, John J. Cornwell, Robert B. Tuns
Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.
ISAACS, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF THE ESTATE OF HENRIETTA E. CUNNINGHAM, BANKRUPT, v. HOBBS TIE & TIMBER COMPANY. No. 72. Argued January 23, 26, 1931. Decided February 24, 1931. Mr. William R. Watkins for Isaacs, Trustee. Mr. John R. Duty, w
United States v. Sprague
UNITED STATES v. SPRAGUE et al. No. 606. Argued January 21, 1931. Decided February 24, 1931. Solicitor General Thacker, with whom Assistant Attorney General Youngquist and Messrs. Robert P. Reeder, John J. Byrne, Mahlon D. Kiefer, and Erwin
Saranac Automatic Machine Corp. v. Wirebounds Patents Co.
SARANAC AUTOMATIC MACHINE CORPORATION v. WIREBOUNDS PATENTS COMPANY et al. No. 51. Argued January 13, 1931. Decided February 24, 1931. Messrs. Howard M. Cox and Amasa C. Paul for petitioner. Mr. Laurence A. Janney, with whom Mr. Edward F. D
Husty v. United States
HUSTY et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 477. Argued January 22, 1931. Decided February 24, 1931. Mr. Harold A. Kesler, with whom Messrs. John B. McMahon and Percy F. Parrott were on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Amos W. W. Woodcock, with whom
Alford v. United States
ALFORD v. UNITED STATES. No. 370. Argued January 6, 1931. Decided February 24, 1931. Mr. Leo R. Friedman, with whom Mr. Thomas M. Foley was on the brief, for petitioner. Assistant Attorney General Richardson, with whom Solicitor General Tha
Oxford Paper Co. v. Nidarholm
OXFORD PAPER COMPANY v. THE NIDARHOLM. No. 58. Argued January 20, 1931. Decided February 24, 1931. Messrs. John W. Lowrance and Nathan W. Thompson for petitioner. Mr. Robert E. Goodwin for respondent.
Prussian v. United States
PRUSSIAN v. UNITED STATES. No. 448. Argued January 6, 7, 1931. Decided February 24, 1931. Mr. Harold L. Turk, with whom Messrs. Sam Rosen-wéin, P. F. Sdgenfeld, and Walter B. Milkman were on ,the brief, for petitioner. Assistant Attorney Ge
Connecticut v. Massachusetts
CONNECTICUT v. MASSACHUSETTS. No. 12, Original. Argued January 5, 6, 1931. Decided February 24, 1931. Messrs. Ernest L. Averill, Deputy Attorney General of Connecticut, and Benedict M. Holden, with whom Mr. Benjamin W. Ailing, Attorney Gene
United States v. Michel
UNITED STATES v. MICHEL. SAME v. KRIEGER. Nos. 79 and 80. Argued January 28, 1931. Decided February 24, 1931. Assistant Attorney General Youngquist, with whom Attorney General Mitchell and Messrs. Claude R. Branch, Bewail Key and John H. Mc
Burnet v. Niagara Falls Brewing Co.
BURNET, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. NIAGARA FALLS BREWING COMPANY et al. No. 61. Argued January 21, 1931. Decided February 24, 1931. Mr. Claude R. Branch, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom Solicitor General Thack
Burnet v. National Industrial Alcohol Co.
BURNET, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL ALCOHOL COMPANY, INCORPORATED. No. 109. Argued January 21, 22, 1931. Decided February 24, 1931. Mr. Claude R. Branch, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom Soli
V. Loewers Gambrinus Brewery Co. v. Anderson
V. LOEWERS GAMBRINUS BREWERY COMPANY v. ANDERSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 352. Argued January 22, 1931. Decided February 24, 1931. Mr. Arthur B. Hyman, with whom Mr. Karl D. Loos was on íhe brief, for petition
Coolidge v. Long
COOLIDGE et al., TRUSTEES, v. LONG, COMMISSIONER OF CORPORATIONS AND TAXATION OF MASSACHUSETTS. Nos. 33 and 34. Argued December 8, 1930. Decided February 24, 1931. Mr. Robert G. Dodge, with whom Mr. Harold S. Davis was on the brief, for app
Various Items of Personal Property v. United States
VARIOUS ITEMS OF PERSONAL PROPERTY et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 114. Argued January 27, 1931. Decided February 24, 1931. Mr. Lewis Landes for petitioners. . Assistant Attorney Generad Youngquist, with whom Solicitor General Thacher and Mess
United States v. La Franca
UNITED STATES v. LA FRANCA. No. 74. Argued January 27, 1931. Decided February 24, 1931. Assistant Attorney General Youngquist, with whom Solicitor General Thaeher and Messrs. John J. Byrne and Paul D. Miller were on the brief, for-the Unite
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.