Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1932 Cases
367 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad v. Terte
DENVER & RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD CO. et al. v. TERTE, JUDGE. No. 130. Argued November 24, 1931. — Decided January 4, 1932. Mr. Thomas Hackney, with whom Mr. Cyrus Crane was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Clay C. Rogers for responden
Lewis v. Reynolds
LEWIS et al., TRUSTEES, v. REYNOLDS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 115. Argued December 8, 9, 1931. — Decided January 4, 1932. Mr. N. E. Corthell for petitioners. Assistant Attorney General Youngquist, with whom Solicitor General Thach
United States ex rel. Polymeris v. Trudell
UNITED STATES ex rel. POLYMERIS et al. v. TRUDELL, IMMIGRATION INSPECTOR. No. 162. Argued December 9, 1931. — Decided January 4, 1932. Mr. Harold Van Riper for petitioners. Mr. Claude R. Branch, with whom Solicitor General Thgcher, Assistan
Marine Transit Corp. v. Dreyfus
MARINE TRANSIT CORP. et al. v. DREYFUS et al. No. 172. Argued December 10, 11, 1931. — Decided January 4, 1932. Mr. Horace. L. Cheyney for petitioners. Mr. George V. Á. McCloskey for respondents. Messrs. Julius Henry Cohen and Kenneth Dayto
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United States
ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 287. Argued December 3, 4, 1931. — Decided January 4, 1932. Mr. Frederick H. Wood, with whom Messrs. Walter McFarland, Elmer A. Smith, P. F. Gault, H. H. Larimore, J
Godfrey v. Godfrey
No. 837. Godfrey v. Godfrey, Executor.
Lavine v. California
No. 786. Lavine et al. v. California.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.