Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1933 Cases
334 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Board of Water Commissioners
No. 584. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Board of Water Commissioners of Dunkirk et al. December 18, 1933. Messrs. Frank Gibbons and George F. Cushwa for petitioner. Messrs. Marion H. Fisher, Louis L. Babcock, and Ray M. StanVey for respondents.
Charles Ilfeld Co. v. Hernandez
No. 579. Charles Ilfeld Co. v. Hernandez, Collector of Internal Revenue. December 18, 1933. Mr. A. T. Hannett for petitioner. Solicitor General Biggs and Messrs. Sewall Key and Norman D. Keller for respondent.
Ex parte Boyce
No. —, original. Ex parte Boyce. December 18, 1933. Mr. Benjamin A. Boyce, pro se.
Ross v. Fort
No. 613. Ross v. Fort, Commissioner of Finance & Taxation of Tennessee. Decided December 18, 1933. Mr. J. A. Fowler for appellant. No appearance for appellee. Jurisdictional statement submitted December 9, 1933.
Bisbee Linseed Co v. Paragon Paint & Varnish Corp.
No. 572. Bisbee Linseed Co, v. Paragon Paint & Varnish Corp. December 11, 1933. Mr. Walbridge S. Tajt for petitioner. Mr. John F. Hughes lor respondent.
Olson v. United States
No. 580. No. 581. No. 582. Olson v. United States; Karlson v. Same; and Brewster v. Same. December 11, 1933. Messrs. Harry H. Peterson, I. K. Lewis, C. E. -Berkman, and John H. Hóugen for petitioners. Solicitor General Biggs and Mr. Paul A.
Arrow-Hart & Hegeman Electric Co. v. Federal Trade Comm'n
No. 363. Arrow-Hart & Hegeman Electric Co. v. Federal Trade Comm’n. December 11, 1933. Messrs. Charles Neave, Arthur F. Mullen, Arthur L. Shipman, Wallace W. Brown, and Charles Welles Gross for petitioner. Solicitor General Biggs, Assistant
Clark v. Moffett
No. 181. Clark, Administratrix, et al. v. Moffett et al. December 11, 1933.
New York ex rel. Northern Finance Corp. v. Lynch
Nos. 600 and 601. New York ex rel. Northern Finance Corp. v. Lynch et al. Jurisdictional statement submitted December 2, 1933. Decided December 11, 1933. Mr. Edwin DeT. Bechtel for appellant. Mr. Wendell P. Brown for appellees.
Missouri Pacific R. v. Norwood
No. 124. Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Norwood, Attorney General of Arkansas, et al. Argued December 6, 1933. Decided December 11, 1933. Mr. Edward J. White, with whom Mr. Thomas B. Pryor was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Frank L. Mulhollan
United States v. Murdock
UNITED STATES v. MURDOCK. No. 88. Argued November 6, 1933. Decided December 11, 1933. Solicitor General Biggs, with whom Messrs. Sewall Key and John H. MoEvers were on the brief, for the United States. Mr. Harold J. Bandy, with whom Mr. Edm
Ormsby v. Chase
ORMSBY et al., EXECUTORS, v. CHASE. No. 101. Argued November 15, 16, 1933. Decided December 11, 1933. Mr. C. Brewster Rhoads, with whom Messrs. Laurence H. Eldredge and' Robert T. McCracken were,on the brief; for petitioners. Mr. Edward J.
Funk v. United States
FUNK v. UNITED STATES. No. 394. Argued November 13, 14, 1933. Decided December 11, 1933. Mr. John W. Carter, Jr., with whom Mr. Charles A. Hammer was on the brief, for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General MacLean, with whoin Solicitor Ge
Helvering v. Butterworth
HELVERING, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. BUTTERWORTH et al., TRUSTEES. No. 75. Argued November 13, 1933. Decided December 11, 1933. Mr. Erwin N. Griswold, with whom Solicitor General Biggs and Messrs. Sewall Key and Wm. Cutler Thomps
United States v. Chavez
UNITED STATES v. CHAVEZ et al. No. 162. Argued November 6, 7, 1933. Decided December 11, 1933. Solicitor General Biggs, with whom Assistant Solicitor General MacLean and Messrs. Harry S. Ridgely and W. Marvin Smith were on the brief, for th
Malavazos v. Irving Trust Co.
No. 524. Malavazos et al. v. Irving Trust Co., Trustee in Bankruptcy. December 4, 1933. Dismissed on motion of Mr. Albert D. Cash for petitioners. Mr. Moses Cohen for respondent.
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Jamaica Truck Tire Service, Inc.
No. 567. No. 568. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc. v. Jamaica Truck Tire Service, Inc., et al.; and Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Same. December 4, 1933. Messrs Silas H. Strawn and John D. Black for Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc. Mr. Charles Le
Wallace v. Franz
No. 557. Wallace v. Franz. December 4, 1933. Messrs. Lon 0. Hocker, James C. Jones, Frank H. Sullivan, and Frank Y. Gladney for petitioner. Mr. Allen McReynolds for respondent.
Allen Gasoline Co. v. Franklin Fire Insurance
No. 539. Allen Gasoline Co. v. Franklin Fire Insurance Co. December 4, 1933. Mr. William C. Bristol for petitioner. Messrs. A. L. Veazie and F. A. Rittenhouse for respondent.
Mcknett v. St. Louis & San Francisco Ry. Co.
No. 597. McKnett v. St. Louis & San Francisco Ry. Co. December 4, 1933. Mr.. Walter Brower for petitioner.. Mr. Forney Johnston for respondent.
Danciger Oil & Rfg. Co. v. Smith
No. 566. Danciger Oil & Rfg. Co. et al. v. Smith et al. Jurisdictional statement submitted November 18, 1933. Decided December 4, 1933. Messrs. S. A. L. Morgan, I. J. Bingolsk.y, W. G. Boatright, and Nelson Phillips for appellants. No appea
Trotter v. Tennessee
TROTTER, GUARDIAN, v. TENNESSEE. No. 79. Argued November 14, 1933. Decided December 4, 1933. Mr. Bussell B. Kramer for petitioner. Mr. Sam Johnson, with whom Mr. James G. Johnson was on the brief, for respondent.
May v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt Aktiengesellschaft
MAY et al. v. HAMBURG-AMERIKANISCHE PACKETFAHRT AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT. No. 80. Argued November 14, 15, 1933. Decided December 4, 1933. Mr. D. Roger Englar, with whom Messrs. T. Catesby Jones and Henry N. Longley were on thé brief, for petition
Gibbes v. Zimmerman
GIBBES v. ZIMMERMAN et al. No. 117. Argued November 17, 1933. Decided December 4, 1933. Mr. D..W. Robinson for appellant. Mr. Irvine F. Belser, with whom Mr. John M. Daniel, Attorney General of South Carolina, was on the brief, for appellee
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.