Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1934 Cases
397 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Meseck Towing & Transportation Co. v. Baker
No. 879. Meseck Towing & Transportation Co. et al. v. Baker et al; Same v. Smith-Murphy Co., Inc.; and Same v. Ryan et al. No. 880. No. 881. April 30, 1934. Mr. Robert S. Erskine for petitioners. Messrs. Anthony V. Lynch, John W. Crandall,
Ames v. Helvering
No. 864. Ames v. Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue. April 30, 1934. Messrs. Burton E. Eames and R. Gay-nor Wellings for petitioner. Solicitor General Biggs, Assistant Attorney General Wideman, and Messrs. James W. Morris, John Mac
Perkins v. Harrison
No. 935. Perkins et al. v. Harrison, Judge. April 30, 1934. Mr. Cephas F. Perkins, pro se. No appearance for respondent.
Detroit Trust Co. v. The Thomas Barlum
No. 909. Detroit Trust Co., Trustee, v. The Thomas Barlum et al.; and Same v. The John J. Barlum et al. No. 910. April 30, 1934. Messrs. Ferris D. Stone, Ray M. Stanley, and Ellis H. Gidley for petitioner. Messrs. George E. Brand and Thomas
Helvering v. Stockholms Enskilda Bank
No. 895. Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, v. Stockholms Enskilda Bank. April 30, 1934. Solicitor General Biggs for petitioner. Mr. TrUrnan Henson for respondent.
Standard Oil Co. v. McLaughlin
No. 848. Standard Oil Co. v. McLaughlin, Collector of Internal Revenue. April 30, 1934.
Trinityfarm Construction Co. v. Grosjean
No. 355. Trinityfarm Construction Co. v. Grosjean. April 30, 1934.
Dayton Power & Light Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
DAYTON POWER & LIGHT CO. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO. No. 609. Argued March 13, 14, 1934. Decided April 30, 1934. Mr. John E. Mullin, with whom Messrs. Edwin P. Mathews, Charles P. Pfarrer, and Chester J. Gerkin were on the brief
Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United States
MISSISSIPPI VALLEY BARGE LINE CO. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 807. Argued April 5, 1934. Decided April 30, 1934. Mr. James R. Van Slyke, with whom Messrs. Gity A. Thompson and Truman P. Young were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. J. Stanley
Sauder v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.
SAUDER, ADMINISTRATRIX, et al. v. MID-CONTINENT PETROLEUM CORP. No. 660. Argued April 3, 1934. Decided April 30, 1934. Mr. Harry W. Colmery, with whom Mr. Ray S. Pierson was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Richard H. Wills, with whom Mr.
Healy v. Ratta
HEALY, CHIEF OF POLICE, v. RATTA. No. 731. Argued April 4, 1934. Decided April 30, 1934. Mr. H. Thornton Lorimer, Assistant Attorney General of New Hampshire, for appellant. Mr. Fred C. Demond argued the cause, and Mr. Jonathan Piper filed
Olson v. United States
OLSON v. UNITED STATES. No. 580. Argued March 9, 1934. Decided April 30, 1934. Mr. I. K. Lewis, with whom Messrs. C. E. Berkman and John H. Hougen were on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Harry H. Peterson, Attorney General of Minnesota, and
Local Loan Co. v. Hunt
LOCAL LOAN CO. v. HUNT. No. 783. Argued April 4, 5, 1934. Decided April 30, 1934. Mr. Frederic Burnham, with whom Messrs. David F. Rosenthal, Orville W. Lee, and Richard Mayer were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Lloyd A. Faxon for respon
McKnett v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co.
McKNETT v. ST. LOUIS & SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY CO. No. 597. Argued March 12, 1934. Decided April 30, 1934. Mr. J. Kirkman Jackson, with whom Mr. Walter S. Brower was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. L. D. Gardner, Jr., for respondent.
Loughran v. Loughran
LOUGHRAN v. LOUGHRAN et al., TRUSTEES. No. 565. Argued March 7, 1934. Decided April 30, 1934. Mr. Robert H. McNeill for petitioner. Mr. Wm. E. Leahy, with whom Messrs. Wm. J. Hughes, Jr., Eugene B. Sullivan, and James F. Reilly were on the
Avery v. Commissioner
AVERY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. Nos. 791 and 792. Argued April 5, 1934. Decided April 30, 1934. Mr. Leland K. Neeves for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General MacLean, with whom Solicitor General Biggs, Assistant Attorney Gener
Sanders v. Armour Fertilizer Works
SANDERS v. ARMOUR FERTILIZER WORKS et al. No. 106. Submitted February 5, 1934. Decided April 30, 1934. Mr. Thomas D. Gresham submitted for petitioner. Messrs. Charles J. Faulkner, Jr., and Mark McMahon submitted for Armour Fertilizer Works,
Spring City Foundry Co. v. Commissioner
SPRING CITY FOUNDRY CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. Nos. 727 and 728. Argued April 3, 1934. Decided April 30, 1934. Messrs. Richard H. Tyrrell and Edgar L. Wood-for petitioner. Mr. Erwin N. Griswold, with whom Solicitor General Big
Lindheimer v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.
LINDHEIMER et al. v. ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. No. 440. Argued January 15, 16, 1934. Decided April 30, 1934. Messrs. George I. Haight and Benjamin F. Goldstein, with whom Messrs. William H. Sexton and Edmund D. Adcock were on the brief, f
Blumenthal v. Greenfield
No. 866. Blumenthal v. Greenfield. April 9, 1934. Messrs. Robert T. McCracken and Ralph S. Harris for petitioner. Messrs. Stanley Folz and George Wharton Pepper for respondent.
Bauman v. Chicago & North Western Ry. Co.
No. 875. Bauman et al. v. Chicago & North Western Ry. Co. April 9, 1934. Mr. Paul F. Good for petitioners. Messrs. Wymer Dressier, Robert D. Neely, Wm. T. Fancy, and Samuel H. Cady for respondent.
St. Paul Bridge & Terminal Ry. Co. v. Natalino
No. 878. St. Paul Bridge & Terminal Ry. Co. v. Natalino. April 9, 1934. Mr. Morton Barrows for petitioner. Mr. Samuel A. Anderson for re-respondent.
Burnham v. Arcola Sugar Mills Co.
No. 823. Burnham v. Arcola Sugar Mills Co. April 9, 1934. Mr. Robert H. Kelley for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Wilner v. United States
No. 861. Wilner v. United States. April 9, 1934. Mr. Edward H. S. Martin for petitioner. Solicitor General Biggs and Messrs. Will G. Beardslee, Randolph C. Shaw, and Charles Bunn for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.