Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1934 Cases
397 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Manhattan Properties, Inc. v. Irving Trust Co.
MANHATTAN PROPERTIES, INC. v. IRVING TRUST CO., TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY. No. 505. Argued January 10, 1934. Decided February 5, 1934. Mr. William D. Mitchell, with whom Messrs. C. Dickerman Williams, Rollin Browne, Ralph Montgomery Arkush, and
Murray v. Joe Gerrick & Co.
MURRAY v. JOE GERRICK & CO. et al. No. 308. Argued January 19, 1934. Decided February 5, 1934. Mr. M. M. Doyle argued the cause, and Mr. Wm. Martin filed a brief, for petitioner. Messrs. Rossel C. Thomsen and Walter L. Clark argued the caus
Federal Trade Commission v. R. F. Keppel & Bro. Inc.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. R. F. KEPPEL & BRO., INC. No. 194. Argued January 11, 1934. Decided February 5, 1934. Assistant Attorney General Stephens, with whom Solicitor General Biggs and Messrs. Hammond E. Chaffetz, Robert E. Healy, and J
Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Seattle
PACIFIC TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. v. SEATTLE et al. No. 364. Argued January 15, 1934. Decided February 5, 1934. Mr. Otto B. Rupp, with whom Mr. Alfred Sutro was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Walter L. Baumgartner, with whom Mr. A. C. Van
Local 167, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States
LOCAL 167, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, etc., et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 6. Argued January 17, 18, 1934. Decided February 5, 1934. Mr. Samuel H. Kaufman, with whom Mr. Nathan D. Perlman was on the brief, for appellants. Assista
Alabama v. Arizona
ALABAMA v. ARIZONA et al. No. —, original. Argued January 9, 1934. Decided February 5, 1934. Mr. Wm. Logan Martin, with , whom Mr, Thomas E. Knight, Attorney General of Alabama, and Mr. Perry W. Turner were on the brief, for plaintiff. Mr.
United States v. Provident Trust Co.
UNITED STATES v. PROVIDENT TRUST CO., ADMINISTRATOR. No. 224. Argued January 11, 12, 1934. Decided February 5, 1934. Solicitor General Biggs, with whom Assistant Attorney General Wideman and Mr. Paul A. Sweeney were on the brief, for the Un
City of Marion v. Sneeden
CITY OF MARION v. SNEEDEN, RECEIVER, et al. No. 400. Argued December 7, 8, 1933. Decided February 5, 1934. Messrs. Richard Mayer and Henry F. Driemeyer, with whom Messrs. Carl Meyer, David F. Rosenthal, C. E. Pope, and R. T. Cook were on th
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Pottorff
TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. v. POTTORFF, RECEIVER. No. 128. Argued December 7, 1933. Decided February 5, 1934. Mr. M. E. Clinton, with whom Messrs. Del W. Harrington and T. D. Gresham were on the brief, for petitioner. Messrs. Henry E. Hack
Standard Oil Co. v. California
STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA v. CALIFORNIA. No. 347. Argued January 12, 1934. Decided February 5, 1934. Mr. Vincent K. Butler, Jr., with whom Messrs. Oscar Sutro and Felix T. Smith were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. H. H. Linney, D
Clark's Ferry Bridge Co. v. Public Service Commission
CLARK’S FERRY BRIDGE CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 274. Argued January 18, 1934. Decided February 5, 1934. Mr. George Ross Hull for appellant. Mr. E. Everett Mather, Jr., with whom Mr. John Fox Weiss was on the brief
United States v. Chambers
UNITED STATES v. CHAMBERS et al. No. 659. Argued January 16, 17, 1934. Decided February 5, 1934. Solicitor General Biggs, with whom Mr. Robert P. Reeder was on the brief, for the United States. Messrs. Z. I. Walser and William M. Hendren, w
Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
MOORE v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY CO. No. 173. Argued January 10, 11, 1934. Decided February 5, 1934. Mr. Edward Davidson, with whom Mr. John P. Bramhall was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Albert H. Cole for respondent.
Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. United States
No. 676. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co., Trustee, v. United States. January 22, 1934. Messrs. Wilton H. Wallace, E. F. Colladay, and David O. Dunbar for petitioner. Solicitor General Biggs, Assistant Attorney General Wideman
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. United States
No. 653. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. United States. January 22, 1934. Mr. Joseph A. Cantrel for petitioner. Solicitor General Biggs and Mr. Amos W. W. Woodcock for' the United' States.
Sauder v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.
No. 660. Sauder, Administratrix, et al. v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp. January 22, 1934. Mr. Harry W. Colmery for petitioners. Messrs. James C. Denton and Richard H. Wills for respondent.
Ex parte Marks
No. —, original. Ex parte Marks. January 22, 1934. Mr. Ralph Marks, pro se.
Kent-Coffey Mfg. Co. v. Maxwell
No. 294. Kent-Coffey Mfg. Co. v. Maxwell, Commissioner of Revenue of North Carolina. Argued January 19, 1934. Decided January 22, 1934. Messrs. Mark Squires and Samuel J. Ervin, Jr., for appellant. Mr. Dennis G. Brummitt, Attorney General o
Irving Trust Co. v. Compania Mexicana de Petroleo " La Libertad," S.A.
No. 654. Irving Trust Co., Receiver, v. Compania Mexicana de Petroleo “ La Libertad,” S.A., et al. January 15, 1934. Messrs. J. M. Richardson Lyeth for petitioner. Mr. William M. Chadbourne for respondents.
Cook v. Commissioner
No. 646. Cook et al., Executors, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. January 15, 1934. Messrs. Thomas G. Haight, Robert H. Montgomery, and /. Mar.vin Haynes for petitioners. Solicitor General Biggs and Messrs. Erwin N. Griswold, Sewall Key
Harter v. Wallace Trustee
Nos. 594 and 595. Harter, Receiver, v. Wallace Trustee, et al. January 15, 1934. Mr. Elmer T. Bell for petitioner. Mr. Joseph J. Daniels for respondents.
Norton v. Vesta Coal Co.
No. 178. Norton, Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Employees’ Compensation Comm’n, v. Vesta Coal Co. Argued January 11, 1934. Decided January 15, 1934. Assistant Solicitor General MacLean, with whom Solicitor General Biggs and Mr. W. Clifton Slone
Brown v. Helvering
BROWN v. HELVERING, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 187. Argued December 13, 14, 1933. Decided January 15, 1934. Mr. Arthur B. Dunne, with whom Mr. Lloyd M. Robbins was on the brief, for petitioner. Solicitor General Biggs, with whom
Reynolds v. Cooper
REYNOLDS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. RICHARD F. COOPER. No. 227. Argued December 11, 1933. Decided January 15, 1934. Mr. Erwin N. Griswold, with whom Solicitor General Biggs, Mr. Sewall Key, and Miss Helen R. Carloss were on the brie
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.