Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1935 Cases
400 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. Graves
No. 166. D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. Graves, President of the State Tax Commission, et al. Motion to dismiss submitted September 10, 1935. Decided October 14, 1935. Mr. Walter H. Liebman, Jr., for appellant. Mr. Henry Epstein for appellees.
Connecticut General Life Insurance v. Johnson
No. 154. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. v. Johnson, Treasurer. Motion to dismiss submitted September 10, 1935. Decided October 14, 1935. Mr. Baymond Benjamin for appellant. Mr. U. S. Webb for appellee.
Washington v. Holland
No. 117. Washington v. Holland. Motion to dismiss submitted September 10, 1935. Decided October 14, 1935. Mr. Alexander T. Gordon for appellant. Mr. W. C. Bibb for appellee.
Willis v. Tennessee
No. 81. Willis v. Tennessee. Jurisdictional statement submitted September 10, 1935. Decided October 14, 1935. Mr. W. C. Cherry for appellant. Mr. W. F. Barry, Jr., for appellee.
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Louisiana Oil Refining Corp.
No. 987. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. et al. v. Louisiana Oil Refining Corp. et al. June 3, 1935. Messrs. Robert Wilkins Thompson, T. D. Gresham, J. Ií. Tallichet, C. M. Spence, G. B. Ross, and C. Huffman Lewis for petitioners. No appearance
Ezra v. Lamont
No. 940. Ezra v. Lamont et al. June 3, 1935. Mr. Robert F. Greacen for petitioner. Mr. Jerome S. Hess for respondents.
Wanless Iron Co. v. Commissioner
No. 959. Wanless Iron Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. June 3, 1935. Mr. A. L. Agatin for petitioner. Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Wideman, Mr. J. Louis Monarch, and Miss Louise Foster for respondent.
Jasper County Lumber Co. v. McNeill
No. 947. Jasper County Lumber Co. v. McNeill. June 3, 1935. Mr. Will E. Orgain for petitioner. Mr. M. G. Adams for respondent.
Gardner-Denver Co. v. Commissioner
No. 933. Gardner-Denver Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. June 3, 1935. Mr. Robert Ash for petitioner. Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Wideman, and Messrs. James W. Morris and Morton K. Rothschild for respondent.
Madison v. United States
No. 883. No. 884. No. 892. No. 902. No. 903. No. 1022. Madison v. United States; Stohl v. Same; Faulkner et al. v. Same; Baldwin et al. v. Same; Keller et al. v. Same; and Green v. Same. June 3, 1935. Mr. William W. Ray for Madison. and Sto
New York City v. Murray
No. 943. New York City v. Murray, Receiver, et al. June 3, 1935. Messrs. C. Dickerman Williams and Samuel Seahury for petitioner. Messrs. Edwin S. S. Sunderland, John W. Davis, Nathan L. Miller, Charles E. Hughes, Jr., and Carl M. Owen for
Hulburd v. Commissioner
No. 937. Hulburd v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. June 3, 1935. Messrs. John E. Hughes, Henry A. Gardner, and Alfred T. Carton for petitioner. Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Wideman, Mr. Sewall Key, and Miss Helen R.
Ex parte Marine
No. —, original. Ex Parte Marine. June 3, 1935. Mr. Richard E. Marine, pro se.
West v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.
WEST et al. v. CHESAPEAKE & POTOMAC TELEPHONE COMPANY OF BALTIMORE. No. 648. Argued April 10, 11, 1935. — Decided June 3, 1935. Messrs. Richard F. Cleveland and John Henry Lewin, with whom Mr. Herman M. Moser was on the brief, for appellant
Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. Redman
BALTIMORE & CAROLINA LINE, INC. v. REDMAN. No. 178. Argued December 6, 1934. — Decided June 3, 1935. Mr. George Whitefield Betts, Jr., with whom Mr. William R. Meagher was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Martin A. Schenck, with whom Mr. F
The Admiral Peoples
THE ADMIRAL PEOPLES. No. 696. Submitted April 12, 1935. — Decided June 3, 1935. Messrs. Andrew O. Haley and John P. Hannon submitted for petitioner. Messrs. W. Lair Thompson and Wallace McCamant submitted for respondents. The docket title o
Minnie v. Port Huron Terminal Co.
MINNIE v. PORT HURON TERMINAL CO. et al. No. 678. Argued April 12, 1935. — Decided June 3, 1935. Mr. Eugene F. Black, with whom Mr. Jesse P. Wolcott was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Leo J. Carrigan filed a brief on behalf -of responden
Ickes v. VirGinia-Colorado Development Corp.
ICKES, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, v. VIRGINIA-COLORADO DEVELOPMENT CORP. No. 23. Argued October 16, 1934. — Decided June 3, 1935. Assistant Attorney General Blair, with whom Solicitor General Biggs and Mr. H. Brian Holland were on the brief
Rudo v. A. H. Bull Steamship Co.
No. 932. Rudo v. A. H. Bull Steamship Co. et al. May 27, 1935. Mr. Sol C. Berenholtz for petitioner. Mr. George Forbes for respondents.
International Shoe Co. v. Rubins
No. 909. International Shoe Co. v. Rubins et al. May 27, 1935. Mr. Robert G. Dreffein for petitioner. Mr. A. Martin Curtis for respondents.
Sullivan v. United States
No. 900. Sullivan v. United States. May 27, 1935. Mr. Irving A. Jennings for petitioner. Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Wideman, and Messrs. James W. Morris and John H. McEvers for the United States.
Bushman v. United States
No. 871. Bushman, Administrator, v. United States. May 27, 1935. Messrs. William P. Smith and John C. Evans for petitioner. Solicitor General Reed, Assistant Attorney General Wideman, and Mr. James W. Morris for the United States.
Ex parte Poresky
No. —, original. Ex parte Poresky. May 27, 1935. Mr. Joseph Poresky, pro se.
Rosenthal v. Langley
No. 974. Rosenthal v. Langley et al. Motion submitted May 18, 1935. Decided May 27, 1935. Mr. Ben E. Pierce for appellant. No appearance for appellees.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.