Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1938 Cases
377 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Mercer v. Lence
No. 103. Mercer v. Lence, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service. October 10, 1938. Messrs. Orr Cha-pman and Fred J. Babcock for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Townsend, and Messrs. Hugh A. Fisher, William W. Barron
Home Indemnity Co. v. National Motorship Corp.
No. 93. Home Indemnity Co. v. National Motorship Corp. October 10, 1938. Mr. Edwin R. Wolff for petitioner. Mr. Courtland Palmer for respondent.
Boyce v. United States
No. 89. Boyce v. United States. October 10, 1938. Messrs. Wm. R. Green, Jr. and Hugh Satterlee for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Gardner, Assistant Attorney General Morris, and Mr. Sewall Key for the United States.
Dysart v. United States
No. 83. Dysart, Trustee v. United States. October 10, 1938. Messrs. Howard G. Cook and Robert T. McCracken for petitioner. Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Attorney General Morris, and Messrs. Sewall Key and Harry Marselli for the Unite
Indian Territory Oil & Gas Co. v. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co.
No. 79. Indian Territory Oil & Gas Co. v. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. October 10, 1938. Mr. W. H. Kor-negay for petitioner. Messrs. W. P. McGinnis, Donald Prentice, Samuel H. Riggs, and W. T. Anglin for respondent.
Greiman v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
No. 67. Greiman, Trustee, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. et al. October 10, 1938. Mr. Murray Greiman, pro se. Mr. Harry Cole Bates for Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. et al.; Mr. Edward A. Markley for Equitable Life Assurance Society; and Mr
Shubrick v. Van Camp Products Co.
Nos. 59 and 60. Shubrick et al. v. Van Camp Products Co. et al. October 10, 1938. Messrs. Clair McTurnan, William B. Higgins, Denver C. Harlan, John G. Buchanan, and William J. Kyle, Jr. for petitioners. Messrs. George W. Pah mer, James W.
Voorhees v. Syck
No. 50. Voorhees v. Syck, Sheriff. October 10, 1938. Mr. Matthias N. Orfield for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Paramino Lumber Co. v. Marshall
No. 44. Paramino Lumber Co. et al. v. Marshall, Deputy Commissioner. October 10, 1938. Messrs. Cassius E. Gates and Edward G. Dobrin for petitioners. Solicitor General Jackson, Assistant Attorney General Whitaker, and Messrs. Henry A. Julic
Wabash Railway Co. v. Bridal
No. 40. Wabash Railway Co. v. Bridal. October 10, 1938. Mr. Homer Hall for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
United States v. Driver
No. 33. United States v. Driver. October 10, 1938. Solicitor General Jackson for the United States. Messrs. Samuel T. Ansell and Mahlon C. Masterson for respondent.
Toledo Pressed Steel Co. v. Standard Parts, Inc.
No. 166. No. 167. Toledo Pressed Steel Co. v. Standard Parts, Inc.; and Same v. Huebner Supply Co. October 10, 1938. Mr. Wilber Owen for petitioner. Messrs. William P. Blair and Will Freeman for respondents.
Palmer v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.
No. 105. Palmer et al. v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co. October 10, 1938. Messrs. Hermon J. Wells and James Garfield for petitioners. Mr. George W. Martin for respondent.
Reed v. Colpoys
No. 327. Reed v. Colpoys. October 10, 1938. Mr. James J. Laughlin for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Futrell v. Newport News
No. 225. Futrell, Administratrix, v. Newport News et al. October 10, 1938. Mr. William Davis Butts for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
Taylor v. United States
No. 171. Taylor v. United States. October 10, 1938. Mr. Henry E. Kahn for petitioner. No appearance for the United States.
Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Smith
No. 195. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. v. Smith. October 10, 1938. Mr. Henry B. Potter for petitioner. Mr. Frederick R. Graves for respondent.
Helvering v. Chester N. Weaver Co.
No. 304. Helvering, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, v. Chester N. Weaver Co. October 10, 1938. Solicitor General Jackson for petitioner. Messrs. Adolphus E. Graupner and Arthur E. Cooley for respondent.
Currin v. Wallace
No. 275. Currin et al. v. Wallace, Secretary of Agriculture, et al. October 10, 1938. Mr. J. W. H. Roberts for petitio'ners. Solicitor General Jackson for respondents.
Lyon v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n
No. 189. Lyon v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Assn. October 10, 1938. Mr. John W. Nance for petitioner. Mr. Thomas B. Pryor for respondent.
Princess Lida of Thurn & Taxis v. Fitzgerald
No. 118. Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis et al. v. Fitzgerald et al. October 10, 1938. Messrs. ;Charles H. Tuttle and Gerald J. Craugh for petitioners. Mr. Gerald Purcell Fitzgerald, pro se.
White v. United States
No. 96. No. 97. White et al. v. United States; and White, Executor, v. United States. October 10, 1938. Mr. John P. OKI for petitioners. Acting Solicitor General Townsend, Assistant Attorney General Morris, and Mr. Sewall Key for tbe United
Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp.
No. 51. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Nu-Enamel Corp. et al. October 10, 1938. Messrs. George A. Carpenter and George I. Haight for petitioner. Mr. Edward S. Rogers for respondents.
Loomis v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
No. 277. Loomis et al. v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assn. October 10, 1938. Mr. Joseph P. JBrazy for petitioners. Messrs. William Ryan and Horace Russell for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.