Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1941 Cases
431 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Minnesota v. Duluth
No. 539. No. 540. No. 541. No. 542. No. 543. Minnesota v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. et al.; Same v. Duluth & Iron Range Railway Co. et al.; Same v. Spirit Lake Transfer Railway Co. et al.; Same v. Oliver Iron Mining Co.; and Sa
Pacific National Bank v. Merced Irrigation District
No. 591. Pacific National Bank of San Francisco v. Merced Irrigation District. January 6, 1941. Messrs. Herman Phleger and W. Coburn Cook for petitioner/ Messrs. Stephen. W. Downey and C. Ray Robinson for respondent.
Ex parte Kelly
No. —, original. Ex parte Clarence Kelly. January 6, 1941.
National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. LINK-BELT COMPANY. No. 235. Argued December 18, 1940. Decided January 6, 1941. Mr. Robert B. Watts, with whom Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, and Messrs. Thomas E. Harris, Lauren
Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group
RECONSTRUCTION FINANCE CORP. et al. v. PRUDENCE SECURITIES ADVISORY GROUP et al. No. 69. Argued December 16, 17, 1940. Decided January 6, 1941. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, with whom Solcitor. General-Biddle and Messrs. Richard H. Demu
Railroad Commission v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS et al. v. HUMBLE OIL & REFINING CO. No. 57. Argued December 12, 1940. Decided January 6, 1941. ■Mr. James P. Hart, Assistant Attorney General of Texas, with whom Messrs. Gerald C. Mann, Attorney General, Edgar W
Railroad Commission v. Rowan & Nichols Oil Co.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS et al. v. ROWAN & NICHOLS OIL CO. No. 218. Argued December 12, 13, 1940. Decided January 6, 1941. Mr, James P. Hart, Assistant Attorney General of Texas, with whom Messrs. Gerald C. Mann, Attorney General, Edgar
Palmer v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.
PALMER et al., TRUSTEES, v. CONNECTICUT RAILWAY & LIGHTING CO. No. 38. Argued November 15, 1940. Decided January 6, 1941. ■ Mr. James .Garfield, with whom Mr. Hermon J. Wells was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. George W. Martin for respo
Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.
VANDENBARK v. OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS CO. No. 141. Argued December 13, 1940. Decided January 6, 1941. ■ Messrs. Paul D. Smith and Thomas H. Sutherland for petitioner. • Mr. Lawrence Earl Broh-Kahn, with whom Mr. Lloyd T. Williams was on the br
Voeller v. Neilston Warehouse Co.
VOELLER et al. v. NEILSTON WAREHOUSE CO. et al. No. 97. Submitted December 18, 1940. Decided January 6, 1941. Messrs. Carrington T. Marshall and Orland R. Crawfis submitted for petitioners. Mr. Francis J. Wright submitted for respondents.
McClain v. Commissioner
McCLAIN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 55. Argued December 12, 1940. Decided January 6, 1941. Mr. Edward D. Smith, Jr., with whom Mr. M. E. Kil-patrick was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 55. Miss Helen R. Carloss, with whom S
H. J. Heinz Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
H. J. HEINZ COMPANY v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 73. Argued December 17, 18, 1940. Decided January 6, 1941. Mr. Earl F. Reed, with whom Messrs. Roy G. Bost-wick and. Donald W. Ebbert were oh the brief, for . petitioner. Assistant
Electro-Chemical Engraving Co. v. Commissioner
ELECTRO-CHEMICAL ENGRAVING CO., INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 62. Argued December 12, 1940. Decided January 6, 1941. Mr. George P. Halperin, with whom Mr. Bernard S. Barron was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Norman D. Kel
Helvering v. Hammel
HELVERING, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. HAMMEL et ux. No. 49. Argued December 11, 1940. Decided January 6, 1941. Mr. Norman D. Keller, with whom Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Mr. Sewall Key were on
Jackson ex rel. United States v. Irving Trust Co.
JACKSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES, AND AS SUCCESSOR TO THE ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, v. IRVING TRUST CO., EXECUTOR, et al. No. 75. Argued December 19, 1940. Decided January 6, 1941. Assistant Attorney General Shea, w
Z. & F. Assets Realization Corp. v. Hull
Z. & F. ASSETS REALIZATION CORP. v. HULL, SECRETARY OF STATE, et al. No. 381. Argued December 9, 10, 1940. Decided January 6, 1941. Mr. Joseph M. Proskauer, with whom Messrs. Frank Roberson, John F. Condon, Jr., and John Bassett Moore were
Harris v. Zion's Savings Bank & Trust Co.
No. 629. Harris, Administrator, v. Zion's Savings Bank & Trust Co.
Tinkoff v. Gold
No. 869. Tinkoff et al. v. Gold, Trustee, et al.
Hussock v. New York
No. 716. Hussock v. State of New York.
Casebeer v. Hudspeth
No. 631. Casebeer v. Hudspeth, Warden.
Journeymen Tailors Local No. 195 of the Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. Miller's Inc.
No. 700. Journeymen Tailors Local No. 195 of the Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America et al. v. Miller’s Inc.
Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group
No. 210. No. 211. No. 214. No. 259. No. 273. Manufacturers Trust Co. et al. v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group et al.; Endelman et al. v. Prudence-Bonds Corp. et al.; Kelby, Trustee, v. Prudence Securities Advisory Group et al.; Prudence
Stewart v. Johnston
No. 498. Stewart v. Johnston.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.