Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1942 Cases
403 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Sampayo v. Bank of Nova Scotia
No. 1197. Carlota Benitez Sampayo v. Bank of Nova Scotia. June 8, 1942. Carlota Benitez Sampayo, pro se. Mr. Henri Brown for respondent.
Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. Hall
No. 887. Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. Hall, Agent, et al. June 8, 1942. Mr. Sam Clammer for petitioner.
Group of Institutional Investors v. Chicago
No. 875. No. 876. No. 877. No. 878. No. 879. No. 880. No. 881. No. 882. No. 883. No. 988. Group of Institutional Investors et al. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co.; Group of Institutional Investors et al. v. Union Trust
Seminole Nation v. United States
No. 348. Seminole Nation v. United States. June 8, 1942.
Wold v. Industrial Accident Commission
No. —. Wold v. Industrial Accident Commission of California et al. June 8, 1942.
Walling v. A. H. Belo Corp.
WALLING, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, v. A. H. BELO CORPORATION. No. 622. Argued April 6, 1942. Decided June 8, 1942. Solicitor General Fahy, with whom Messrs. Arnold Baum, Warner W. Gardner, Irvin
Jones v. Opelika
JONES v. OPELIKA. BOWDEN et al. v. FORT SMITH. JOBIN v. ARIZONA. NO. 280. NO. 314. NO. 966. Argued (No. 280) February 5, 1942 and (Nos. 314 and 966) April 30, 1942. Decided June 8, 1942. Mr. Hayden C. Covington, with whom Mr. Joseph F. Ruth
Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. Missel
OVERNIGHT MOTOR TRANSPORTATION CO., INC. v. MISSEL. No. 939. Argued April 6, 7, 1942. Decided June 8, 1942. Messrs. J. Ninian Beall and John R. Norris for petitioner. Mr. George A. Mahone, with whom Messrs. W. Hamilton Whiteford and William
Zimmer v. New York State Tax Commission
Nos. 1254 and 1255. Zimmer, Substitute Trustee, v. New York State Tax Commission. June 1, 1942. Mr. Lydon F. Maider for petitioner. Messrs. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney General of the State of New York, Henry Epstein, Solicitor General, a
Engineers Club of Philadelphia v. United States
No. 1201. Engineers Club of Philadelphia v. United States. June 1, 1942. ikfr. John E. Hughes for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. Sewall Key and J. Louis Monarch for the United States.
Williams v. Keyes
No. 1228. Williams et al. v. Keyes et al. June 1, 1942. Mr. E. Albert Pallot for petitioners. Mr. M. Lewis Hall for respondents.
Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.
No. 1206. Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co. et al. June 1, 1942. Mr. John L. Murphy for petitioner. Mr. Arthur B. Dunne for respondents.
Gump v. Commissioner
No. 1192. Gump, Executrix, et al., v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. June 1, 1942. Mr. Chellis M. Carpenter for petitioners. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. Sewall Key and Joseph M. Jones for respond
Bush v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America
No. 1183. Bush v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America. June 1, 1942. Messrs. Paul E. Lesh and Dale D. Drain for petitioners. Mr. Richard T. Rector for respondent.
Miller v. United States
No. 1152. No. 1168. Miller et al. v. United States; and Dees et al. v. United States. June 1, 1942. Mr. Dan B. Schwartz for petitioners in No. 1152. Mr. Frank F. L’Engle for petitioners in No. 1168. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorne
Keys v. United States
No. 1217. Keys v. United States. June 1, 1942. Mr. C. W. Prince for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy for the United States.
Tinkoff v. Griffith
No. 1238. Tinkoff v. Griffith et al. June 1, 1942. Paysoff Tinkoff, pro se.
Swift & Co. v. United States
No. 595. Swift & Company et al. v. United States et al. June 1, 1942.
Fifth Street Building v. McColgan
No. 1239. Fifth Street Building v. McColgan, Franchise Tax Commissioner. June 1, 1942. Mr. Clark J. Milliron for appellant. Messrs. Earl Warren, Attorney General of California, H. H. Linney and Valentine Brooks for appellee.
Chrysler Corp. v. United States
CHRYSLER CORPORATION et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 1036. Argued May 1, 4, 1942. Decided June 1, 1942. Mr. Nicholas Kelley, with whom Messrs. William Stanley and William D. Donnelly were on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Albert Holmes Baldrid
Ward v. Texas
WARD v. TEXAS. No. 974. Argued May 6, 1942. Decided June 1, 1942. Messrs. Leon A. Ransom and W. Robert Ming, Jr. for petitioner. Messrs. Pat Coon, Assistant Attorney General of Texas, and Spurgeon E. Bell, with whom Mr. Gerald C. Mann, Atto
Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson
SKINNER v. OKLAHOMA ex rel. WILLIAMSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL. No. 782. Argued May 6, 1942. Decided June 1, 1942. Messrs. W. J. Hulsey,, H. I. Aston, and Guy L. Andrews submitted for petitioner. Mr. Mac Q. Williamson, Attorney General of Oklahom
Helvering v. Cement Investors, Inc.
HELVERING, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. CEMENT INVESTORS, INC. No. 644. Argued April 27, 1942. Decided June 1, 1942. Assistant Attorney General Clark, with, whom Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. Sewall Keyt J. Louis Monarch, and S
A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. Walling
A. B. KIRSCHBAUM CO. v. WALLING, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE WAGE & HOUR DIVISION, U. S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR. No. 910. Argued April 28, 29, 1942. Decided June 1, 1942. Mr. William Clarke Mason, with whom Mr. Frederick H. Knight was on the brief, f
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.