Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1943 Cases
420 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Murdock v. Pennsylvania
MURDOCK v. PENNSYLVANIA (CITY OF JEANNETTE). No. 480. Argued March 10, 11, 1943. Decided May 3, 1943. Mr. Hayden C. Covington for petitioners. Mr. Fred B. Trescher for respondent. Together with No. 481, Perisich v. Pennsylvania (City of Jea
Jones v. Opelika
JONES v. OPELIKA. No. 280, October Term, 1941. Reargued March 10, 11, 1943. Decided May 3, 1943. Mr. Hayden C. Covington for petitioners. No appearance for respondents in Nos. 280 and 314, and appellee in No. 966. Briefs of amici curiae wer
Detroit Edison Co. v. Commissioner
DETROIT EDISON CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 675. Argued April 13, 1943. Decided May 3, 1943. Mr, Norris Darrell, with whom Messrs. Edward H. Green and Oscar C. Hull were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Arnold Raum, with wh
Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Kelly
CENTRAL HANOVER BANK & TRUST CO. et al. v. KELLY, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER. No. 659. Argued April 12, 13, 1943. Decided May 3, 1943. Mr. Robert McC. Marsh, with whom Messrs. Jehiel G. Shipman and Claude A. Hope were on the brief, for appellan
Noble v. United States
NOBLE, doing business as NOBLE TRANSIT CO., v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 511. Argued April 6, 7, 1943. Decided May 3, 1943. Messrs. Charles A. Lethert and C. D. Todd, Jr. for appellant. Mr. Allen Crenshaw, with whom Solicitor General Fahy an
Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power Commission
JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT CO. v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION. No. 299. Argued January 4, 5, 1943. Reargued March 4, 5, 1943. Decided May 3, 1943. Mr. John W. MacDonald for petitioner in No. 299, and Messrs. Frederic P. Glick and Allen E. Th
National Labor Relations Board v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO. No. 460. Argued March 5, 8, 1943. Decided May 3, 1943. Mr. Robert B. Watts, with whom Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. Robert L. Stern and Ernest A. Gross and Miss
Southland Gasoline Co. v. Bayley
SOUTHLAND GASOLINE CO. v. BAYLEY et al. No. 581. Submitted April 5, 1943. Decided May 3, 1943. Mr. Claude H. Rosenstein submitted for petitioner in No. 581. Mr. George A. Mahone for petitioner in No. 725. Mr. C. D. Atkinson submitted for re
St. Pierre v. United States
ST. PIERRE v. UNITED STATES. No. 687. Argued April 15, 1943. Decided May 3, 1943. Mr. Edward V. Broderick, with whom Messrs. S. Bertram Friedman and Joseph H. Broderick were on the brief, for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant At
Steffler v. United States
STEFFLER v. UNITED STATES. No. 14, Original. Decided May 3, 1943. Fred Steffler, pro se.
Bowles v. United States
BOWLES v. UNITED STATES. No. 589. Argued April 14, 1943. Decided May 3, 1943. Mr. Osmond K. Fraenkel for petitioner. Assistant Attorney General Berge, with whom Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Richard S. Salant were on the brief, for the Uni
Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n
ROCHE, U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE, et al. v. EVAPORATED MILK ASSOCIATION et al. No. 584. Argued April 6, 1943. Decided May 3, 1943. Mr. Paul A. Freund argued the cause, and Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Mess
L. T. Barringer & Co. v. United States
L. T. BARRINGER & CO. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 520. Argued March 3, 1943. Decided May 3, 1943. Mr. Nuel D. Belnap, with whom Messrs. Luther M. Walter and John S. Burchmore were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Robert L. Pierce, with whom
Fitzgerald v. Kansas
No. 757. Fitzgerald v. Kansas et al. April 19, 1943. Edward B. Fitzgerald, pro se.
Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railway Co. v. Hagenbuch
No. 354. Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railway Co. v. Hagenbuch et al., Trustees, et al.; and Chamberlain et al. v. Hagenbuch et al., Trustees, et al. No. 355. April 19, 1943. Mr. Paul D. Miller for petitioners. Mr. Andrew P. Martin for George
Philadelphia Inquirer Co. v. Coe
No. 799. Philadelphia Inquirer Co. v. Coe, Commissioner of Patents. April 19, 1943. Mr. Frank E. Scrivener for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Messrs. Valentine Brookes and Leon Frechtel for responde
Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 759. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association v. National Labor Relations Board. April 19, 1943. Messrs. Herbert W. Erskine, Edmund Nelson, G. D. Schilling, and Louis Ferrari for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs
Franklinville Realty Co. v. Arnold Construction Co.
No. 819. Franklinville Realty Co. v. Arnold Construction Co. April 19, 1943. Mr. T. J. Blackwell for petitioner. Messrs. Bert Winters and Paul W. Potter for respondent.
Moore v. Maverick County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1
No. 804. Moore v. Maverick County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1. April 19, 1943. Mr. James B. Lewright for petitioner. Mr. W. L. Matthews for respondent.
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Toledo, Peoria & Western Railroad
No. 848. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al. v. Toledo, Peoria & Western Railroad. April 19, 1943. Mr. John E. Cassidy for petitioners. Messrs. John M. Elliott and Clarence W. Heyl for respondent.
Ex parte Bozel
No. —, original. Ex parte Emmet H. Bozel; Ex parte Elmer Davis; Ex parte Charles Erickson; and Ex parte Frank Roberson. No. —, original. No. —, original. No. —, original. April 19, 1943.
Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co.
AGUILAR v. STANDARD OIL CO. OF NEW JERSEY. No. 454. Argued March 2, 3, 1943. Decided April 19, 1943. Mr. George J. Engelman for petitioner in No. 454; and Mr. Joseph W. Henderson, with whom Mr. George M. Brodhead, Jr. was on the brief, for
Board of County Commissioners v. Seber
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al. v. SEBER et al. No. 556. Argued March 3, 4, 1943. Decided April 19, 1943. Messrs. Mac Q. Williamson, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Houston E. Hill, Assistant Attorney General, with whom Mr. Norman J.
United States v. Lepowitch
UNITED STATES v. LEPOWITCH et al. No. 629. Argued April 8, 1943. Decided April 19, 1943. Mr. Archibald Cox argued the cause, and Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Mr. George F. Kneip were on the brief, for the Un
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.