Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1944 Cases
404 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Middleton & Co. v. Ocean Dominion Steamship Corp.
No. 523. Middleton & Co. (Canada), Ltd., et al. v. Ocean Dominion Steamship Corp. January 3, 1944.
Zernit v. United States
No. 501. Zernit v. United States. January 3, 1944. Mr. Ernest Angelí for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Mr. Robert S. Erdahl for the United States.
Wilson Milling Co. v. Commissioner
No. 510. Wilson Milling Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. January 3, 1944. Messrs. Geo. E. H. Goodner and Scott P. Crampton for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Samuel 0. Clark, Jr., and Messrs. Sewall K
Ex parte Barnett
No. —. No. —. Ex parte Andrew Barnett; and Ex parte Jack A. McCoy. January 3, 1944.
City of Yonkers v. United States
CITY OF YONKERS et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 109. Argued December 13, 14, 1943. Decided January 3, 1944. Mr. John J. Broderick, with whom Mr. Leonard G. McAneny was on the brief, for the City of Yonkers; and Mr. Horace M. Gray for Joh
Mercoid Corp. v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.
MERCOID CORPORATION v. MINNEAPOLIS-HONEYWELL REGULATOR CO. Nos. 58 and 59. Argued December 9, 10, 1943. Decided January 3, 1944. Mr. George L. Wilkinson for petitioner. Mr. Will Freeman, with whom Messrs. W. P. Bair and George H. Fisher wer
Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.
MERCOID CORPORATION v. MID-CONTINENT INVESTMENT CO. et al. Nos. 54 and 55. Argued December 9, 1943. Decided January 3, 1944. Mr. George L. Wilkinson for petitioner. Mr. Casper W. Ooms, with whom Messrs. Richard Spencer, Richard L. Johnston,
Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION et al. v. HOPE NATURAL GAS CO. NO. 34. Argued October 20, 21, 1943. Decided January 3, 1944. Assistant Attorney General Shea, with whom Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. Paul A. Freund, K. Norman Diamond, Melvin Ri
California v. United States
CALIFORNIA et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. NO. 20. Argued December 6, 1943. Decided January 3, 1944. Mr. Lucas E. Kilkenny, Deputy Attorney General of California, with whom Mr. Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General, was on the brief, for appella
United States v. Myers
UNITED STATES v. MYERS. NO. 142. Argued December 16, 17, 1943. Decided January 3, 1944. Assistant Attorney General Shea, with whom Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. Chester T. Lane, J. Frank Staley, and Paul A. Sweeney were on the brief, f
Falbo v. United States
FALBO v. UNITED STATES. No. 73. Argued November 19, 1943. Decided January 3, 1944. Mr. Hayden C. Covington, with whom Mr. Victor F. Schmidt was on the brief, for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, with whom Assistant Attorney General Tom C
United States v. Laudani
UNITED STATES v. LAUDANI. No. 71. Argued December 16, 1943. Decided January 3, 1944. Mr. Chester T. Lane, with whom Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Messrs. Edward G. Jennings, W. Marvin Smith, Douglas B.
Walton v. Southern Package Corp.
WALTON, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. SOUTHERN PACKAGE CORPORATION. No. 159. Argued December 17, 1943. Decided January 3, 1944. Mr. Chas. F. Engle submitted for petitioner. Mrs. Elizabeth Rulen, with whom Messrs. William H. Watkins and P. H. Eager, Jr
United States v. Hark
UNITED STATES v. HARK et al., co-partners, doing business as LIBERTY BEEF CO. No. 83. Argued December 8, 9, 1943. Decided January 3, 1944. Mr. Paul A. Freund, with whom Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. C
United States v. Gaskin
UNITED STATES v. GASKIN. No. 68. Argued December 7, 8, 1943. Decided January 3, 1944. Mr. W. Marvin Smith, with whom Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, Messrs. Oscar A. Provost and George Earl Hoffman, and Miss Beatri
Hill v. Hawes
HILL, ADMINISTRATOR, v. HAWES et al., TRUSTEES. No. 4. Argued December 6, 1943. Decided January 3, 1944. Mr. Henry Lincoln Johnson, Jr., with whom Mr. Thurman L. Dodson was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. John B. Gunion for Francis L. Haw
Dixie Pine Products Co. v. Commissioner
DIXIE PINE PRODUCTS CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 84. Argued December 14, 15, 1943. Decided January 3, 1944. Mr. T. J. Wills for petitioner. Mr. Arnold Raum, with whom Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Samuel
Illinois Steel Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
ILLINOIS STEEL CO. v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. No. 99. Argued December 16, 1943. Decided January 3, 1944. Mr. Paul B. Conaghan for petitioner. Mr. Francis R. Cross, with whom Mr. George E. Hamilton was on the brief, for respondent.
Nathanson v. United States
No. 560. Nathanson v. United States.
Mercado E Hijos v. Commins
No. 497. Mario Mercado E Hijos v. Commins et al.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.