Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1945 Cases
417 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Finn v. Meighan
FINN, TRUSTEE, v. MEIGHAN, SUBSTITUTED TRUSTEE. No. 953. Argued April 27, 1945. Decided May 21, 1945. Mr. Joseph Lorenz for petitioner. Mr. Burton C. Meighan, Jr., with whom Mr. Louis A. Marckisio was on the brief, for respondent.
Angelus Milling Co. v. Commissioner
ANGELUS MILLING CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 610. Argued March 7, 8, 1945. Decided May 21, 1945. Mr. Prew Savoy for petitioner. Mr. J. Louis Monarch, with whom Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Samuel O. Cla
Commissioner v. Estate of Bedford
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ESTATE OF BEDFORD et al. No. 710. Argued March 29, 1945. Decided May 21, 1945. Miss Helen R. Carloss, with whom Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Samuel 0. Clark, Jr., Mr. Sewall Key and
Esenwein v. Commonwealth ex rel. Esenwein
ESENWEIN v. COMMONWEALTH ex rel. ESENWEIN. No. 20. Argued October 12, 13, 1944. Decided May 21, 1945. Mr. Sidney J. Watts, with whom Mr. Fred C. Houston was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. J. Thomas Hoffman for respondent.
Williams v. North Carolina
WILLIAMS et al. v. NORTH CAROLINA. No. 84. Argued October 13, 1944. Decided May 21, 1945. Mr. W. H. Strickland for petitioners. Hughes J. Rhodes, Assistant Attorney General of North Carolina, with whom Harry McMullan, Attorney General, and
De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United States
De BEERS CONSOLIDATED MINES, LTD. et al. v. UNITED STATES. NO. 1189. Argued May 2, 1945. Decided May 21, 1945. Mr. Wm. Dwight Whitney, with whom Mr. Robert T. Swaine was on the brief, for petitioners in No. 1189. Mr. John M. Harlan, with wh
United States Alkali Export Ass'n v. United States
UNITED STATES ALKALI EXPORT ASSOCIATION, INC. et al. v. UNITED STATES. NO. 1016. Argued May 1, 2, 1945. Decided May 21, 1945. Mr. Wm. Dwight Whitney, with whom Messrs. Leland Hazard, David A. Reed, Calvin A. Campbell, Robert T. McCracken, R
Dickey v. Raisin Probation Zone No. 1
No. 966. Dickey v. Raisin Probation Zone No. 1 et al. May 7, 1945.
Haiges v. Ragen
No. 1184. No. 1202. Haiges v. Ragen, Warden; and Swolley v. Ragen, Warden. May 7,1945.
National Homeopathic Hospital Ass'n v. Britton
No. 1124. National Homeopathic Hospital Association et al. v. Britton, Deputy Commissioner. May 7,1945. Mr. James E. McCabe for petitioners. Assistant Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Shea, Messrs. Paul A. Sweeney and Max G
75 Cases of Peanut Butter v. United States
No. 1077. 75 Cases of Peanut Butter et al. v. United States. May 7, 1945. Messrs. Raymond M. Hudson and J. Charles Fagan for petitioners. Assistant Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark and Mr. Robert S. Erdahl for
Maryland Casualty Co. v. County of Allegheny
No. 1029. No. 1099. Maryland Casualty Co. v. County of Allegheny; and County of Allegheny v. Maryland Casualty Co. May 7, 1945. Messrs. Duane R. Dills and George W. Dexter for the Maryland Casualty Co. Messrs. John J. O’Con-nell and Edward
Jewell Ridge Coal Corp. v. Local No. 6167, United Mine Workers
JEWELL RIDGE COAL CORPORATION v. LOCAL NO. 6167, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA et al. No. 721. Argued March 9, 1945. Decided May 7, 1945. Messrs. William A. Stuart and George Richardson, Jr. for petitioner. Mr. Crampton Harris, with whom M
Screws v. United States
SCREWS et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 42. Argued October 20, 1944. Decided May 7, 1945. Mr. James F. Kemp, with whom Messrs. Clint W. Hager and Robert B. Short were on the brief, for petitioners. Solicitor General Fahy, with whom Assistant At
Compagna v. United States
No. 935. Compagna et al. v. United States. April 30,1945.
Murphy v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California
No. 1148. Murphy et al. v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California et al. April 30, 1945. Dismissed per stipulation of counsel. Mr. Sidney M. Ehr-man for petitioners.
Sullivan v. Florida
No. 1042. Sullivan v. Florida. April 30, 1945. Mr. Z. H. Douglas for petitioner.
DeJordan v. Hunter
No. 695. DeJordan v. Hunter, Warden. April 30, 1945. Charles F. DeJordan, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, Messrs. Robert S. Erdahl and Leon Ulman for respondent.
Cohen v. United States
No. 1083. Cohen v. United States. April 30, 1945. Mr. Thomas I. Sheridan for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, Mr. Robert S. Erdahl and Miss Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Mills v. Commissioner
No. 1070. Talbot Mills v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. April 30, 1945. Mr. Melville F. Weston for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Messrs. Sewall Key, J. Louis Monarch and Harry Baum
Morton v. United States
No. —. Morton v. United States. April 30, 1945.
Hoover Co. v. Coe
HOOVER COMPANY v. COE, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS. No. 486. Argued March 5, 1945. Decided April 30, 1945. Messrs. William D. Sellers and Richard R. Fitzsim-mons, with whom Mr. William S. Hodges was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. T. Hayward
United States v. Wyoming
No. 10, original. United States v. Wyoming et al. April 25, 1945.
Wood v. Mississippi
No. 1076. Wood v. Mississippi.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.