Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1947 Cases
391 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Banks v. Ragen
No. 194, Misc. Banks v. Ragen, Warden.
Guth v. Texas Co.
No. 450. Guth v. Texas Company. Albert H. Fry for petitioner. Henry I. Oreen, Enos L. Phillips and Harold A. Smith for respondent.
Andres v. United States
Certiorari Granted. (See also No. 222, Misc., supra.) No. 431. Andres v. United States. O. P. Soares for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Robert S. Erdahl and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.
Marino v. Ragen
MARINO v. RAGEN, WARDEN. No. 93. Decided December 22, 1947. Petitioner pro se. George F. Barrett, Attorney General of Illinois, William C. Wines and James C. Murray, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Blumenthal v. United States
BLUMENTHAL v. UNITED STATES. NO. 54. Argued October 23, 1947. Decided December 22, 1947. Arthur B. Dunne argued the cause for petitioners in Nos. 54, 55 and 57. With him on a brief filed for petitioner in No. 55 was Walter H. Duane. Samuel
Kavanagh v. Noble
KAVANAGH, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. NOBLE. No. 70. Argued November 18, 1947. Decided December 22, 1947. Lee A. Jackson argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assist ant Attorney Genera
Jones v. Liberty Glass Co.
JONES, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. LIBERTY GLASS CO. No. 71. Argued November 17-18, 1947. Decided December 22, 1947. Lee A. Jackson argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attor
Commissioner v. Wilson
No. 420. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Wilson. Solicitor General Perlman for petitioner.
Brunson v. North Carolina
Certiorari Granted. (See also Nos. 139 and 301, supra.) No. 292. Brunson v. North Carolina; King v. North Carolina; Jones v. North Carolina; James et al. v. North Carolina; and Watkins et al. v. North Carolina. No. 293. No. 294. No. 295. No
Edward G. Budd Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
December 15, 1947. Per Curiam Decision. No. 301. Edward G. Budd Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board. Archibald Broomfield for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, David P. Findling and Ruth Weyand for respondent.
Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Public Service Commission
PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE CO. v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF INDIANA et al. No. 69. Argued November 14, 17, 1947. Decided December 15, 1947. John S. L. Yost argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Ira Lloyd Letts and A
Kirkrand v. Illinois
No. 177, Misc. Kirkrand v. Illinois.
United States ex rel. Kessler v. Watkins
No. 414. United States ex rel. Kessler et al. v. Watkins, District Director of Immigration & Naturalization. Relators pro se. Solicitor General Perlman, Herbert A. Bergson and Samuel D. Slade for respondent.
Kuehn v. United States
No. 416. Kuehn v. United States. Casper A. Ornbaun for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Robert S. Erdahl and Sheldon E. Bernstein for the United States.
Addison Miller, Inc. v. United States
No. 385. Addison Miller, Inc. et al. v. United States. Karl Michelet and Wm. J. Hogan, Jr. for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Herbert A. Bergson, Paul A. Sweeney and Harry I. Rand for the United States.
Francis v. Southern Pacific Co.
No. 400. Francis et al. v. Southern Pacific Co. Parnell Black, Calvin W. Rawlings and Harold E. Wallace for petitioners. Paul H. Ray and S. J. Quinney for respondent.
Cole v. Arkansas
Certiorari Granted. No. 373. Cole et al. v. Arkansas. Lee Pressman, David Rein and Joseph Forer for petitioners.
Traffic Telephone Workers' Federation v. Driscoll
No. 438. Traffic Telephone Workers’ Federation et al. v. Driscoll, Governor, et al. Israel B. Greene for appellants.
Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. Board of Railroad Commissioners
AERO MAYFLOWER TRANSIT CO. v. BOARD OF RAILROAD COMMISSIONERS OF MONTANA et al. No. 39. Argued October 15, 1947. Decided December 8, 1947. Edmond G. Toomey argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant. Clarence Hanley, Assistant Attorne
Williams v. Fanning
WILLIAMS et al. v. FANNING, POSTMASTER OF LOS ANGELES. No. 47. Argued October 22, 1947. Decided December 8, 1947. Richard L. North argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Irving M. Walker. Frederick Bernays Wiener argued
Clark v. Uebersee Finanz-Korp.
CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, AS SUCCESSOR TO THE ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, v. UEBERSEE FINANZ-KORPORATION, A. G. No. 35. Argued May 1, 1947. Reargued November 12, 1947. Decided December 8, 1947. M. S. Isenbergh argued the cause for petitioner.
Silesian-American Corp. v. Clark
SILESIAN-AMERICAN CORP. et al. v. CLARK, ATTORNEY GENERAL, AS SUCCESSOR TO THE ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN. No. 6. Argued May 1, 1947. Reargued November 12, 1947. Decided December 8, 1947. Leonard P. Moore argued the cause for petitioners. Wit
Patton v. Mississippi
PATTON v. MISSISSIPPI. No. 122. Argued November 21, 24, 1947. Decided December 8, 1947. Thurgood Marshall argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Andrew Weinberger. George H. Ethridge, Assistant Attorney General of Missis
Holderfield v. Ragen
No. 171, Misc. Holderfield v. Ragen, Warden.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.