Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1949 Cases
383 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Reanier v. Smith
No. 196, Misc. Reanier v. Smith, Superintendent.
Dalton v. Hunter
No. 44, Misc. Dalton v. Hunter, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Campbell, Robert S. Erdahl and Felicia H. Dubrovsky for respondent.
Titusville Dairy Products Co. v. Brannan
No. 443. Titusville Dairy Products Co. v. Brannan, Secretary of Agriculture. Willis F. Daniels and George H. Hafer for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Joseph W. Bishop, Jr., J. Stephen Doyle, Jr., Neil Brooks and Lewis A. Sigler for
Gauley-Eagle Coal & Coke Co. v. Blair
No. 381. Gauley-Eagle Coal & Coke Co. v. Blair et al. Brooks B. Callaghan for petitioner. William L. Lee and Thomas B. Jackson for respondents.
Sherman v. Ragen
No. 372, Misc., October Term, 1948. Sherman v. Ragen, Warden, et al.,
O. C. Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. United States
December 19, 1949. Per Curiam Decisions. No. 464. O. C. Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. United States et al. W. G. Burnette for appellant. Solicitor General Perlman and Daniel W. Knowlton for appellees. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the conside
Hubsch v. United States
HUBSCH v. UNITED STATES. No. 379. Decided December 19, 1949. Morris Berick was on the application for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman was on the application for the United States. Together with No. 380, Schweitzer v. United States.
Carter v. Atlanta & St. Andrews Bay Railway Co.
CARTER v. ATLANTA & ST. ANDREWS BAY RAILWAY CO. No. 23. Argued October 14, 1949. Decided December 19, 1949. J. Kirkman Jackson argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. B. D. Murphy argued the cause for respondent. With him on the
Alcoa Steamship Co. v. United States
ALCOA STEAMSHIP CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES. No. 271. Argued November 16, 1949. Decided December 19, 1949. Melville J. France argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Samuel D. Slade argued the cause for the United States. With him
Lama v. California
No. 138, Misc. Lama v. California et al.
Interstate Equipment Corp. v. United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
No. 424. Interstate Equipment Corp. v. United States District Court for the District of New Jersey et al. Charles Danzig for petitioner. Harry V. Osborne, Jr. for respondents.
Order of Railway Conductors v. Southern Railway Co.
No. 438. Order of Railway Conductors of America v. Southern Railway Co. V. C. Shuttleworth, Harry E. Wilmarth and Frederick H. Horlbeck for petitioner. Nath B. Barnwell, Frank G. Tompkins, Henry L. Walker, W. S. Macgill and Sidney S. Alderm
Krug v. Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co.
Miscellaneous Orders. No. 60. Krug, Secretary of the Interior, v. Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co., Inc.
Wilmette Park District v. Campbell
WILMETTE PARK DISTRICT v. CAMPBELL, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 75. Argued November 15-16, 1949. Decided December 12, 1949. Henry J. Brandt argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Gilbert H. Hennessey, Jr. Edward R
United States v. Toronto, Hamilton & Buffalo Navigation Co.
UNITED STATES v. TORONTO, HAMILTON & BUFFALO NAVIGATION CO. No. 39. Argued November 9, 1949. Decided December 12, 1949. Paul A. Sweeney argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman and Assista
O'Donnell v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.
O’DONNELL, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. ELGIN, JOLIET & EASTERN RAILWAY CO. No. 56. Argued October 21, 1949. Decided December 12, 1949. Joseph D. Ryan argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Harlan L. Hackbert argued the cause and filed a
United States v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
UNITED STATES v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO. NO. 35. Argued October 19-20, 1949. Decided December 12, 1949. Leavenworth Colby argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney G
In re Adamson
December 8, 1949. Miscellaneous Order. No. 263, Misc. In re Adamson.
Faulkner v. Gibbs
Rehearing Denied. No. 19. Faulkner v. Gibbs,
Adkins v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co.
No. 108, Misc. Adkins, Administratrix, v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. et al. John W. Porter, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman for the United States; and Peter B. Collins, G. C. Spillers and G. C. Spillers, Jr. for Du P
Fifth & Walnut, Inc. v. Loew's Inc.
No. 400. Fifth & Walnut, Inc. et al. v. Loew’s Inc. et al. Monroe E. Stein and Maurice A. Gellis for petitioners. Louis D. Frohlich, Robert W. Perkins, Edward C. Raftery and John F. Caskey for respondents.
Steigleder v. Eberhard Faber Pencil Co.
No. 420. Steigleder v. Eberhard Faber Pencil Co. et al. Herbert S. Avery for petitioner. Herbert W. Kenway, Raymond L. Greist and J. Bernhard Thiess for respondents.
Kitchens v. Bird
No. 390. Kitchens v. Bird et al. J. R. Wilson for petitioner. J. E. Gaughan for respondents.
United States v. Walker
No. 350. United States v. Walker. Solicitor General Perlman for the United States. Peter L. F. Sabbatino and Thomas J. Todarelli for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.