Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1951 Cases
303 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Koons v. Kaiser
No. 451. No. 452. Koons et al. v. Kaiser et al.; and Koons et al. v. Kaufman, U. S. District Judge. William H. Timbers for petitioners. Samuel I. Rosenman, Godfrey Goldmark and Max Freund for respondents.
DeVane v. U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
No. 302, Misc. DeVane, U. S. District Judge, v. U. S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit et al. Harry G. Fuerst and William Paul Allen for petitioner. Charles Cook Howell for the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company, respondent.
Eagle v. Cherney
No. 81, Misc., October Term, 1949. Eagle v. Cherney et al.,
Kubesh v. Michigan
No. 359, Misc. Kubesh v. Michigan.
Jones v. Cranor
No. 332, Misc. Jones v. Cranor, Superintendent.
Jackson v. Humphrey
No. 289, Misc. Jackson v. Humphrey, Warden.
Melish v. Rector, Church Wardens & Vestrymen of the Church of the Holy Trinity
No. 469. Melish et al. v. The Rector, Church Wardens and Vestrymen of the Church of the Holy Trinity in the City of Brooklyn et al. Raphael H. Weissman for petitioners. Theodore Kiendl and William, R. Meagher for the Church of the Holy Trin
Healy v. Pennsylvania Railroad
No. 427. Healy, Administratrix, v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. John H. Hoffman for petitioner. Philip Price, Hugh B. Cox and James G. Johnson, Jr. for respondent.
Fountain v. Georgia Power Co.
No. 492. Fountain et al. v. Georgia Power Co. Victor Davidson for petitioners. Wallace Miller for respondent.
Hanna v. Meteor
No. 480. Hanna et al., doing business as Hercules Company, v. The Meteor et al. William R. Furlong for petitioners. Bernard Tompkins for respondents.
Lazarov v. Arnold Schwinn & Co.
No. 459. Lazarov, doing business as Tennessee Metal Products Co. et al., v. Arnold Schwinn & Co. Lovick P. Miles for petitioner. Hamilton E. Little for respondent.
Smither v. United States
No. 447. Smither v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Vanech and Roger P. Marquis for the United States.
Superior Engraving Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 434. Superior Engraving Co. v. National Labor Relations Board. George B. Christensen, Otto A. Jaburek and Harold A. Smith for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, John F. Davis, David P. Findling, Mozart G. Ratner and Dominick L. Mano
Woodward v. United States
No. 476. Woodward v. United States et al. Claude T. Wood for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman filed a memorandum stating that the United States was not opposed to the grant of the petition in this case, in view of a conflict between th
Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.
No. 442. No. 443. Schwegmann Brothers et al. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.; and Schwegmann Brothers et al. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp. John Minor Wisdom for petitioners. /. Blanc Monroe, Monte M. Lemann, Walter J. Suthon, Jr. and Robert G. Po
Hoshor v. Heinze
No. 310, No. 311, No. 318, No. 319, No. 335, No. 340, No. 350, No. 356, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Hoshor v. Heinze, Warden, et al.; Connor v. Mayo, Prison Custodian; In re Ruthven; Seals v. Hiatt, Warden; In re DeBinsk
Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. United States
No. 45. No. 46. No. 47. No. 48. Alabama Great Southern Railroad Co. et al. v. United States et al.; Galveston Chamber of Commerce et al. v. United States et al.; Railroad Commission of Texas v. United States et al.; and Savannah Sugar Refin
Consumer Mail Order Ass'n of America v. McGrath
No. 508. Consumer Mail Order Association of America et al. v. McGrath, Attorney General. Thurman Arnold and Milton V. Freeman for appellants.
Bartlett v. Gross Income Tax Division
Nos. 498, 499 and 500. Bartlett, Trustee, v. Gross Income Tax Division et al. Raymond Harkrider and Owen W. Crumpacker for appellant. /. Emmett McManamon, Attorney General of Indiana, and John J. McShane, Lloyd C. Hutchinson and Joseph E. N
Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
MOORE, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY CO. No. 318. Argued January 4, 1951. Reargued January 10, 1951. Decided February 26, 1951. Geo. E. Allen argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Meade T. Spicer, Jr. and Strothe
Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
EMICH MOTORS CORP. et al. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP. et al. No. 209. Argued January 3-4, 1951. Decided February 26, 1951. Anthony Bradley Eben argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Thomas Dodd Heady, Harold Stickler and
United States v. Yellow Cab Co.
UNITED STATES v. YELLOW CAB CO. NO. 218. Argued December 6, 1950. Decided February 26, 1951. James L. Morrisson argued the causes for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Perlman and Paul A. Sweeney. Assistant At
Norton Co. v. Department of Revenue
NORTON COMPANY v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS. No. 133. Argued December 6, 1950. Decided February 26, 1951. Joseph B. Brennan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Roland Towle, Mac Asbill and W. A. Sutherland. W
Warren v. United States
WARREN v. UNITED STATES. No. 87. Argued January 2, 1951. Decided February 26, 1951. Saul Sperling and Charles A. Ellis argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Leavenworth Colby argued the cause for the United States. With him on
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.