Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1951 Cases
303 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Dixon v. Duffy
DIXON v. DUFFY, WARDEN. No. 79. Argued October 16, 1951. Continued November 5, 1951. Franklin C. Stark, acting under appointment by the Court, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Clarence A. Linn, Assistant Attorney General o
Gardner v. Panama Railroad
GARDNER v. PANAMA RAILROAD CO. No. 22. Argued October 11, 1951. Decided November 5, 1951. Eugene Eisenmann argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Thomas J. Maginnis argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Paul
McMahon v. United States
McMAHON v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 17. Argued October 17, 1951. Decided November 5, 1951. Paul M. Goldstein argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Leavenworth Colby argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were S
Sutphen Estates, Inc. v. United States
SUTPHEN ESTATES, INC. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 25. Argued October 11, 1951. Decided November 5, 1951. H. G. Pickering argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Bertram F. Shipman.-. Charles H. Weston argued the cause for
Stack v. Boyle
STACK et al. v. BOYLE, UNITED STATES MARSHAL. No. 400. Argued October 18, 1951. Decided November 5, 1951. Benjamin Margolis and A. L. Wirin argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the brief was Sam Rosenwein. Solicitor General Perlma
Coranato v. New Jersey
No. 158, Misc. Coranato v. New Jersey.
Cities Service Oil Co. v. Park Steamship Co.
No. 259. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Park Steamship Co., Ltd. Barent Ten Eyck for petitioner. Eugene Underwood for respondent.
Pearson v. Commissioner
No. 270. Pearson et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Ste-. phen L. Mayo and J. Edwin Fleming for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman,. Assistant Attorney General Caudle, Ellis N. Slack, A. F. Prescott and Harry Baum for responden
Standard Paving Co. v. Commissioner
No. 261. Standard Paving Co. et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Gentry Lee for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Caudle, Ellis N. Slack■ and Irving I. Axelrad for respondent.
International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Ackerman
No. 245. International Longshoremen’s & Warehousemen’s Union et al. v. Ackerman, Attorney General, et al. Harriet Bouslog for petitioners. Walter D. Ackerman, Jr., Attorney General of Hawaii, J. Garner Anthony, Special Deputy Attorney Gener
Bruner v. United States
No. 87, Misc. Bruner v. United States. Charles J. Bloch and Ellsworth Hall, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman filed a memorandum for the United States stating that the Government does not oppose the granting of the petition.
Sherman v. Illinois
No. 375. Sherman v. Illinois.
Tate v. California
No. 120, Misc. Tate v. California et al.
Schechter v. Burford
No. 101, Misc. Schechter v. Burford, Warden.
Spears v. United States
No. 98, Misc. Spears et al. v. United States. Isaiah H. Spears for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baldridge and Samuel D. Slade for the'United States.
Koehler v. United States
No. 199. Koehler et al. v. United States. Elbert R. Jandt and Ben F. Foster for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney and Robert S. Erdahl for the United States.
Weber v. United States
No. 106. Weber v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney and Robert S. Erdahl for the United States.
C. A. Durr Packing Co. v. Shaughnessy
No. 233. C. A. Durr Packing Co., Inc. v. Shaughnessy, Collector of Internal Revenue. 'Henry T. Dorrance and Russell G. Dunmore, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney'General Caudle, Ellis N. Slack, Helen Goodner
Lynn v. Lynn
No. 40. Lynn v. Lynn. Samuel Gottlieb and Harold I. Cole for petitioner. Herman A. Benjamin for respondent.
Public Utilities Commission v. Pollak
No. 224. No. 295. Public Utilities Commission et al. v. Pollak et al.; and Pollak et al. v. Public Utilities Commission et al. Vernon E.West and Lloyd B. Harrison for the Public Utilities Commission; and Edmund L. Jones, F. Gloyd Await, Sam
Carson v. Roane-Anderson Co.
No. 186. No. 187. Carson, Commissioner of Finance & Taxation, v. Roane-Anderson Company et al.; and Carson, Commissioner of Finance & Taxation, v. Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp. et al. Roy H. Beeler, Attorney General of Tennessee, William
Adams v. Jensen
No. —. Adams v. Jensen et al. John W. Anderson for petitioner.-
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. United States
No. 289. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. et al. v. United States et al. Harry E. Boe, Frank W. Sullivan, Warren H. ■ Wagner and Eldon Martin for appellants.. Solicitor General Perlman and Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States a
Tate v. California
No. 409, Misc., October Term, 1950. Tate v. California et al.,
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.