Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1952 Cases
351 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Smith
UNITED STATES v. SMITH. NO. 20. Argued December 4, 1951. Decided January 7, 1952. Robert S. Erdahl argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Perlman and Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney. Also
United States v. Hayman
UNITED STATES v. HAYMAN. No. 23. Argued October 15, 1951. Decided January 7, 1952. Robert L. Stern argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Mclnerney and James
Okulczyk v. Illinois
No. 237, Misc. Okulczyk v. Illinois.
Thompson v. Illinois
No. 41, Misc. Thompson v. Illinois. Petitioner pro se. Ivan A. Elliott, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.
Ancich v. Borcich
No. 417. Ancich et al. v. Borcich et al. David A. Fall and Arch E. Ekdale. for petitioners. Claude A. Ferguson for respondents.
Texas v. Group of Institutional Investors
No. 416. Texas v. Group of Institutional Investors et al. Price Daniel, Attorney General of Texas, and C. K. Richards, Assistant Attorney General, for petitioner. Charles W. McConaughy for the Group of Institutional Investors; Sanford H. E.
Sgitcovich v. Sgitcovich
No. 394. Sgitcovich v. Sgitcovich. W.. A. Combs for petitioner.
United States v. Duvarney
No. 15. United States v. Duvarney. Solicitor General Perlman for the United States.
Maringer v. Supreme Court
No. 216, Misc. No. 219 Misc. Maringer v. Supreme Court of California; and Roberts v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Acheson v. Murata
No. 422. Acheson, Secretary of State, v. Murata. 'Solicitor General Pérlman and Howard K. Hoddick for appellant. A. L. Wirin, Fred. Okrand and Katsuo Miho for appellee.
Pillsbury v. United Engineering Co.
PILLSBURY et al., DEPUTY COMMISSIONERS, v. UNITED ENGINEERING CO. et al. No. 229. Argued December 6, 1951. Decided January 2, 1952. Samuel D. Slade argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assi
United States v. Kelly
UNITED STATES v. KELLY et al. No. 209. Argued November 30, 1951. Decided January 2, 1952. Saul R. Gamer argued the cause for thé United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baldridge, Paul
Desper v. Starved Rock Ferry Co.
DESPER, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. STARVED ROCK FERRY CO. No. 231. Argued December 6, 1951. Decided January 2, 1952. Joseph D. Ryan argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Charles T. Shanner argued the cause for respondent. With him on t
Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.
KEROTEST MANUFACTURING CO. v. C-O-TWO FIRE EQUIPMENT CO. No. 180. Argued November 30, 1951. Decided January 2, 1952. Walter J. Blenko argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were John F. C. Glenn and Aaron Finger. P. Morton A
Rochin v. California
ROCHIN v. CALIFORNIA. No. 83. Argued October 16, 1951. Decided January 2, 1952. Dolly Lee Butler and A. L. Wirin argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Howard S. Goldin, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause fo
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.