Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1953 Cases
340 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Fehsenfeld v. Whipple
No. 64. No. 238. No. 15, No. 151, No. 525, Misc. Misc. Misc., October Term, 1952. Fehsenfeld et al. v. Whipple et al., McGee v. North Carolina, Neal v. Randolph, Warden, Levy v. California, Brink v. United States,
Thompson v. Lawson
No. 352. Thompson v. Lawson, Deputy Commissioner of the United States Bureau of Employees Compensation, et al.
Petermichl v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
No. 448. Petermichl v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. Louis O. Davidson and Louis P. Miller for petitioner. Otis Lowell Hastings and Drennan J. Slater for respondent.
Henderson v. United States
No. 385. Henderson v. United States. Bernard A. Golding for petitioner. Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Olney and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
United States v. Borden Co.
No. 464. United States v. Borden Company et al. Acting Solicitor General Stern for the United States. Stuart S. Ball for the Borden Company et al., L. Edward Hart, Jr. for the Bowman Dairy Co. et al., and Leo F. Tierney for the Beloit Dairy
Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776
GARNER et al., trading as CENTRAL STORAGE & TRANSFER CO., v. TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS AND HELPERS LOCAL UNION NO. 776 (A. F. L.) et al. No. 56. Argued October 20-21, 1953. Decided December 14, 1953. James H. Booser argued the cause and filed a
Howell Chevrolet Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
HOWELL CHEVROLET CO. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 34. Argued November 12, 1953. Decided December 14, 1953. Erwin Lerten argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Frederick A. Potruch. Marvin E. Frankel argued the
Baldridge v. Ragen
No. 233, Misc. Baldridge v. Ragen, Warden.
Farmer v. Skeen
No. 205, Misc. Farmer v. Skeen, Warden, et al.
Bearing Jobbers, Inc. v. Nice Ball Bearing Co.
No. 447. Bearing Jobbers, Inc. et al. v. Nice Ball Bearing Co. Floyd E. Thompson for petitioners. Frank F. Fowle, Jr. and John R. Young for respondent.
Western Pacific Railroad v. Western Pacific Railroad
No. 441. No. 463. Western Pacific Railroad Corp. et al. v. Western Pacific Railroad Co. et al.; and Metzger et al. v. Western Pacific Railroad Co. et al. Moses Lasky, Frank C. Nicodemus, Jr. and Norris Darrell for petitioners in No. 441. Wi
Southern Pacific Co. v. Miller
No. 349. Southern Pacific Co. v. Miller, Administratrix. Arthur B. Dunne for petitioner. Clifton Hildebrand for respondent.
Valykeo v. West Virginia
No. 204, No. 227, Misc. Misc. Valykeo v. West Virginia; and Taylor v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California et al.
United States v. Arizona
No. 375. United States v. Arizona et al. Acting Solicitor General Stern for the United States. Ross F. Jones, Attorney General of Arizona, Timothy D. Parkman, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, and Irwin Cantor, Assistant to the Att
National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 1229, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. LOCAL UNION NO. 1229, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS. No. 15. Argued October 12, 1953. Decided December 7, 1953. Dominick L. Manoli argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief we
United States v. Five Gambling Devices
UNITED STATES v. FIVE GAMBLING DEVICES etc. NO. 14. Argued October 12, 1953. Decided December 7, 1953. Acting Solicitor General Stern argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beat
Wilko v. Swan
WILKO v. SWAN et al., doing business as HAYDEN, STONE & CO., et al. No. 39. Argued October 21, 1953. Decided December 7, 1953. Richard H. Weis argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Henry E. Mills. By special leave of Co
Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. Hawn
POPE & TALBOT, INC. v. HAWN et al. No. 13. Argued October 12, 1953. Decided December 7, 1953. Mark D. Alspach argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Thomas E. Byrne, Jr. Charles Lakatos argued the cause for Hawn, respond
Wells v. California
No. 61, Misc. Wells v. California,
Jones v. United States
No. 129. No. 232. No. 235. No. 248. No. 252. No. 257. Jones v. United States, Clark v. Texas, Tawes v. Cie. Des Messageries Maritimes, Schwegmann Brothers Giant Super Market et al. v. Eli Lilly & Co., Universal Manufacturing Co. et al. v. F
Morris v. Hiatt
No. 177, Misc. Morris v. Hiatt, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for respondent.
Hoover v. Pennsylvania
No. 163, Misc. Hoover, Administrator, v. Pennsylvania et al. Petitioner pro se. Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Townsend, James D. Hill and George B. Searls for Brownell, Attorney General, and Howard H. Yocum for
Sorimpt v. Cranor
No. 144, Misc. Sorimpt v. Cranor, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary.
Vogt v. Texas
No. 380. Vogt v. Texas. Floyd Duke James for petitioner. John Ben Shepperd, Attorney General of Texas, and James N. Castleberry, Jr., Sam C. Ratliff and Rudy G. Rice, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.