Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1954 Cases
312 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Pollack v. Aspbury
No. 251, Misc. Pollack v. Aspbury et al.
Meeks v. Iowa
No. 228, Misc. Meeks v. Iowa.
Daniels v. Ragen
No. 162, Misc. Daniels v. Ragen, Warden.
Wood v. Utah
No. 92, Misc. Wood v. Utah. Petitioner pro se. E. R. Cal-lister, Attorney General of Utah, and Walter L. Budge and John W. Horsley, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
Rookard v. United States
No. 55, Misc. Rookard v. United States.
Wrather v. American University
No. 411. Wrather et al. v. American University et al. James C. Wilkes for petitioners. E. F. Colladay and D. C. Colladay for American University, Paul B. Crome-lin, Thomas M. Raysor and John B. Olverson for the Lucy Webb Hayes National Trai
Pacific Westbound Conference v. Leval & Co.
No. 410. Pacific Westbound Conference et al. v. Leval & Co., Inc. Joseph J. Geary, Allan E. Charles and Tom Killejer for petitioners. Donald A. Schafer for respondent.
Cooper v. Maryland
No. 362. Cooper v. Maryland. Joseph Loeffler for petitioner. Edward D. E. Rollins, Attorney General of Maryland, and W. Giles Parker, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Lewyt Corp. v. Commissioner
No. 417. Lewyt Corporation (now known as Lewyt Manufacturing Corporation) v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Seymour Sheriff for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Holland, Ellis N. Slack, Lee A. Jackson an
West v. United States
No. 249, Misc. West v. United States.
Barnes v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad
No. 427. Barnes et al. v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown Railroad Co. et al. Alex Elson, Lester P. Schoene, Milton Kramer, Clarence M. Mulholland and Edward J. Hickey, Jr. for petitioners. Kenneth F. Burgess, D. Robert Thomas and Walter J. Cumm
Masters, Inc. v. General Electric Co.
No. 381. Masters, Inc. v. General Electric Co. Joseph F. Ruggieri, Thurman Arnold and Norman Diamond for appellant. Thomas Kiernan and Edgar Barton for appellee.
Reeves v. Alabama
December 6, 1954. No. 120. Reeves v. Alabama. Argued November 15-16, 1954. Decided December 6, 1954. Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Thurgood Marshall, Robert L. Carter and Louis H. Poliak. Robert
Sullivan v. United States
SULLIVAN v. UNITED STATES. No. 64. Argued November 8, 1954. Decided December 6, 1954. Llewellyn A. Luce argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Walter H. Maloney. Charles F. Barber argued the cause for the United States.
United States v. Calderon
UNITED STATES v. CALDERON. No. 25. Argued October 21, 1954. Decided December 6, 1954. Assistant Attorney General Holland argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Marvin E. Frankel, Ellis
Smith v. United States
SMITH v. UNITED STATES. No. 52. Argued October 21-22, 1954. Decided December 6, 1954. W. Arthur Oarrity, Jr. argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Richard Maguire and Paul G. Counihan. Marvin E. Frankel argued the caus
Friedberg v. United States
FRIEDBERG v. UNITED STATES. No. 18. Argued October 20, 1954. Decided December 6, 1954. Robert N. Gorman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Stanley A. Silversteen. Jas. W. Hengelbrok entered an appearance for petition
Holland v. United States
HOLLAND et ux. v. UNITED STATES. No. 37. Argued October 20-21, 1954. Decided December 6, 1954. Sumner M. Redstone and Peyton Ford argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the brief were H. D. Reed and Frank A. Bruno. Marvin E. Frankel
Moore v. Mead's Fine Bread Co.
MOORE v. MEAD’S FINE BREAD CO. No. 121. Argued November 17, 1954. Decided December 6, 1954. Lynell O. Skarda and Dee C. Blythe argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Edward W. Napier argued the cause for respondent. With him on
United States v. Brown
UNITED STATES v. BROWN. No. 38. Argued November 15, 1954. Decided December 6, 1954. Samuel D. Slade argued the cause for the United States. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant :Attorney General Burger, Paul A. Sweeney, Morton Hollander an
Massey v. Moore
MASSEY v. MOORE, WARDEN. No. 119. Argued November 8, 1954. Decided December 6, 1954. Dean Acheson argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. By special leave of Court, pro hac vice, James N. Castle-berry, Jr., Assistant Attorney Gen
Brooks v. National Labor Relations Board
BROOKS v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 21. Argued October 18, 1954. Decided December 6, 1954. Erwin Lerten argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Frederick A. Potruch and Henry S. Fraser. David P. Findling argued
Opper v. United States
OPPER v. UNITED STATES. No. 49. Argued October 22, 1954. Decided December 6, 1954. Frederick Bernays Wiener argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was John M. Kelley, Jr. John F. Davis argued the cause for the United States.
Watson v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.
WATSON et ux. v. EMPLOYERS LIABILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION, LTD. et al. No. 6. Argued October 14, 1954. Decided December 6, 1954. Richard H. Switzer and Cleve Burton argued the cause for appellants-petitioners. With them on the brief was Va
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.