Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1955 Cases
352 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Davis v. Summerfield
No. 626, Misc. Davis v. Summerfield, Postmaster General. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger and Melvin Richter for respondent.
Woods v. Ragen
No. 615, Misc. Woods v. Ragen, Warden.
Vraniak v. Illinois
No. 606, Misc. Vraniak v. Illinois.
Plocar v. Foster
No. 587, Misc. Plocar v. Foster, Sheriff. Reuben A. Garland for petitioner. Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, Robert H. Hall, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, and E. Freeman Leverett, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Witt v. McGee
No. 533, Misc. Witt v. McGee, Director of Corrections, et al.
Hite v. Western Maryland Railway
No. 507, Misc. Hite v. Western Maryland Railway. Milford J. Meyer and William Saxon for petitioner. Hilary W. Gans for respondent.
Parker v. United States
No. 429, Misc. Parker v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrovsky for the United States.
Harris v. Teets
No. 359, Misc. Harris v. Teets, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, Clarence A. Linn, Chief Assistant Attorney General, and Arlo E. Smith, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Mahurin v. Tomlinson
No. 160, Misc. Mahurin v. Tomlinson. Petitioner pro se. John M. Dalton, Attorney General of Missouri, and Samuel M. Watson, Assistant Attorney General,' for respondent.
Pirman v. Florida State Improvement Commission
No. 840. Pirman et al. v. Florida State Improvement Commission et al. O. K. Reaves for petitioners. J. Turner Butler for the Florida State Improvement Commission, respondent.
Pacific Employers Insurance v. Wackerle
No. 776. Pacific Employers Insurance Co. v. Wackerle et al. Roy B. Thomson for petitioner. Lon Hooker for respondents.
Frantz v. United States
No. 767. Frantz et al., doing business as Frantz Equipment Co., v. United States. Joseph W. Henderson, George M. Brod-head and Harry Norman Ball for petitioners. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger, Melvin Richter
West Texas Utilities Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 751. West Texas Utilities Co. v. National Labor Relations Board. Frank Cain for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Theophil C. Kammholz, David P. Findling, Dominick L. Manoli and Frederick U. Reel for respondent.
Couto v. Shaughnessy
No. 653. Couto v. Shaughnessy, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service. Aaron L. Danzig for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff for respondent.
In re Baltzegar
No. -. In re Baltzegar,
Kendrick v. Manning
No. 306, No. 335, No. 596, No. 617, No. 650, No. 657, No. 664, No. 665, No. 669, No. 674, No. 675, No. 680, No. 682, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Kendrick v. Manning, Superintendent, South Ca
Griffin v. Illinois
No. 815. Griffin et al. v. Illinois.
Ellis v. Dixon
ELLIS v. DIXON et al., MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF YONKERS. No. 20. Argued October 18, 1954. Reargued April 20, 1955. Decided June 6, 1955. Emanuel Redfield argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. J. Raymo
Federal Power Commission v. Oregon
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. OREGON et al. No. 367. Argued March 2-3, 1955. Decided June 6, 1955. Willard W. Gatchell argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Rankin,
Mitchell v. C. W. Vollmer & Co.
MITCHELL, SECRETARY OF LABOR, v. C. W. VOLLMER & CO., INC. No. 387. Argued March 3, 1955. Decided June 6, 1955. Stuart Rothman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Ralph S. Spritzer, Bessie
Carroll v. Lanza
CARROLL et al. v. LANZA, DOING BUSINESS AS LAKE CHARLES ELECTRIC CO. No. 375. Argued March 31, 1955. Decided June 6, 1955. Shields M. Goodwin argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners. Alston Jennings argued the cause for responden
Williams v. Georgia
WILLIAMS v. GEORGIA. No. 412. Argued April 18, 1955. Decided June 6, 1955. By invitation of the Court, 348 U. S. 957, Eugene Gressman argued the cause and filed a brief, as amicus curiae, in support of petitioner. Carter Goode submitted on
Whitehouse v. Illinois Central Railroad
WHITEHOUSE et al. v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. et al. No. 131. Argued February 10-11, 1955. Decided June 6, 1955. Milton Kramer argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Lester P. Schoene. Walter J. Cummings, Jr. argue
Federal Communications Commission v. Allentown Broadcasting Corp.
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION v. ALLENTOWN BROADCASTING CORP. No. 451. Argued April 20-21, 1955. Decided June 6, 1955. Warren E. Baker argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General SobelojJ, Marvin E. Fra
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.