Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1956 Cases
423 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Reynolds Metals Co. v. Multnomah County
No. 604. Reynolds Metals Co. v. Multnomah County et al. C. Allan Hart, Jr. for petitioner. Robert F. Maguire for respondents.
L & M Realty Corp. v. Leo
No. 617. L & M Realty Corp. v. Leo, Executrix. Norris E. Halpern for petitioner. Samuel Goldblatt and Paul M. Lipkin for respondent.
Scott Publishing Co. v. Owens
No. 608. Scott Publishing Co. et al. v. Owens. C.W. Halverson for petitioners.
Sanders v. Commissioner
No. 595. Sanders et ux. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue et al. Herman J. Galloway, Dan Moody and John E. Marshall for petitioners. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Holland and 7. Henry Kutz for respondents.
O'Malley v. United States
No. 586. O’Malley et al. v. United States. William Shaw McCollum for O’Malley, petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Reed v. Pennsylvania Railroad
No. 621. Reed v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. Joseph S. Lord, III, for petitioner. Philip Price for respondent.
Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. United States
No. 616. Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. United States. Vance Planche and Samuel W. Planche, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Morton, Roger P. Marquis and Fred W. Smith for the United States.
Washington v. United States
No. 420, Misc. Washington v. United States et al.
Railway Employes' Department v. Hanson
No. 451. Railway Employes’ Department, American Federation of Labor, et al. v. Hanson et al.
V. P. Serodino, Inc. v. United States
No. 589. V. P. Serodino, Inc. v. United States et al. John S. Burchmore and Robert N. Burchmore for appellant. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Charles H. Weston, Robert W. Ginnane and H. Neil Garson for the Un
Gibson v. Lockheed Aircraft Service, Inc.
GIBSON v. LOCKHEED AIRCRAFT SERVICE, INC. No. 42. Argued December 5-6, 1955. Decided February 27, 1956. G. C. Spillers, Jr. argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were G. C. Spillers and Edward C. Fritz. Emory A. Cantey argu
Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.
FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION v. SIERRA PACIFIC POWER CO. NO. 51. Argued November 8, 1955. Decided February 27, 1956. Howard E. Wahrenbrock argued the cause for petitioner in No. 51. With him on the brief were Solicitor General SobelojJ, Assista
United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.
UNITED GAS PIPE LINE CO. v. MOBILE GAS SERVICE CORP. et al. NO. 17. Argued November 7-8, 1955. Decided February 27, 1956. Thomas Fletcher argued the cause for petitioner in No. 17. With him on the brief was C. Huffman Lewis. Howard E. Wahre
Shields v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
SHIELDS v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. No. 150. Argued January 19, 1956. Decided February 27, 1956. Truman M. Hobbs argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was M. R. Nachman, Jr. Norman C. Shepard argued the cause and fi
Commissioner v. Southwest Exploration Co.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SOUTHWEST EXPLORATION CO. NO. 286. Argued January 23-24, 1956. Decided February 27, 1956. Hilbert P. Zarky argued the causes for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assist
United States v. Ryan
UNITED STATES v. RYAN. No. 281. Argued January 19, 1956. Decided February 27, 1956. Oscar H. Davis argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Ros
Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
MASTRO PLASTICS CORP. et al. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 19. Argued October 17, 1955. Decided February 27, 1956. Bernard H. Fitzpatrick argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners. Dominick L. Manoli argued the cause for r
National Labor Relations Board v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Louisville, Inc.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. OF LOUISVILLE, INC. No. 79. Argued January 17, 1956. Decided February 27, 1956. David P. Findling argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobelof
Tidewater Associated Oil Co. v. Williams
No. 582. Tidewater Associated Oil Co. v. Williams. Edw. S. Franklin for petitioner. E. J. Friedman for respondent.
Albers v. Thompson
No. 567. No. 568. Albers et al. v. Thompson, Trustee, et al.; and Missouri Pacific Railroad Company 5¼% Secured Serial Bondholders Committee et al. v. Thompson, Trustee, et al. Harry B. Sutter and Samuel H. Horne for petitioners in No. 567.
Rabin v. Lake Worth Drainage District
No. 570. Rabin, doing business as Jack Rabin Farms, v. Lake Worth Drainage District. William E. Miller for petitioner. Hal H. McCaghren and C. D. Blackwell for respondent.
Crowder v. Virginia ex rel. State Corp. Commission
No. 494. Crowder et al. v. Virginia ex rel. State Corporation Commission. Alexander H. Sands, Sr. and Frank A. S. Wright for appellants. J. Lindsay Almond, Jr., Attorney General of Virginia, and C. F. Hicks, Assistant Attorney General, for
Thompson v. Coastal Oil Co.
No. 105. Thompson v. Coastal Oil Co. Charles Andrews Ellis argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Silas Blake Axtell. Michael E. Hanrahan argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
Mitchell v. King Packing Co.
MITCHELL, SECRETARY OF LABOR, v. KING PACKING CO. No. 39. Argued November 16-17, 1955. Decided January 30, 1956. Bessie Margolin argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Ralph S. Spritzer, Stua
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.