Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1956 Cases
423 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Nelson v. City of New York
NELSON et al., SUCCESSOR TRUSTEES, et al. v. CITY OF NEW YORK. No. 30. Argued November 7, 1956. Decided December 10, 1956. William P. Jones argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Watson Washburn. Seymour B. Quel argued t
Jones v. Mississippi
No. 291, Misc. Jones v. Mississippi.
Wagner v. Higley
No. 224, Misc. Wagner v. Higley, Administrator of Veterans Affairs, et al. Murray A. Gordon for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Melvin Richter and Lester S. Jayson for respondents.
Barker v. United States
No. 471. Barker v. United States. Paul R. Harmel for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Samuel D. Slade for the United States.
Davis v. Pennsylvania
No. 316, Misc. Davis v. Pennsylvania.
Collins v. Heinze
No. 298, Misc. Collins v. Heinze, Warden, et al.
Tomaselli v. Maryland
No. 272, Misc. Tomaselli v. Maryland.
Allocco v. United States
No. 248, Misc. Allocco v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Walter v. Michigan
No. 105, Misc. Walter v. Michigan. Petitioner pro se. Thomas M. Kavanagh, Attorney General of Michigan, Edmund E. Shepherd, Solicitor General, and Daniel J. O’Hara, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
J. M. Carras, Inc. v. Diesel Tanker A. C. Dodge, Inc.
No. 500. J. M. Carras, Inc., v. Diesel Tanker A. C. Dodge, Inc., et al. James M. Estabrook and MacDonald Deming for petitioner. Christopher E. Heckman for Diesel Tanker A. C. Dodge, Inc., et al., and Abraham E. Freedman for Elliott, respond
Roig v. Sugar Board
No. 483. Antonio Roig Sucrs., S. En C., v. Sugar Board of Puerto Rico. James R. Beverley and Francisco Castro-Amy for petitioner. Jose Trias Monge, Attorney General of Puerto Rico, and Abe Fortas, Special Assistant Attorney General, for res
Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. Lavoie
No. 477. Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. Lavoie. Samuel P. Sears for petitioner. John L. Hall for respondent.
Marine Terminals Corp. v. American President Lines, Ltd.
No. 455. Marine Terminals Corp. v. American President Lines, Ltd. Joe Crider, Jr. for petitioner. Joseph J. Geary for respondent.
Creighton Stationery Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
No. 446. Creighton Stationery Co. et al. v. Industrial Accident Commission of California et al. Frank J. Filippi for petitioners. Delger Trowbridge for Sutton, respondent.
Public Utilities Commission v. United States
No. 447. Public Utilities Commission of California v. United States. Everett C. McKeage for appellant.
Newstead v. Nash
No. 252, No. 278, No. 280, No. 281, No. 287, No. 311, No. 317, No. 322, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Newstead v. Nash, Warden; Ryan v. Illinois; Hughes v. Texas; Jackson v. United States; Bilbao v. United States; McKeehan
Butler v. Michigan
No. 16. Butler v. Michigan. Stanley Fleishman and William B. Murrish for movant.
Thompson v. Heither
No. 251, Misc. Thompson v. Heither et al.
Putnam v. Commissioner
PUTNAM et ux. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 25. Argued October 17, 1956. Decided December 3, 1956. Richard E. Williams argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was A. Lyman Beardsley. Philip Elman argued the cause
United States v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
UNITED STATES v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY CO. No. 19. Argued October 15, 1956. Decided December 3, 1956. Morton Hollander argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney Gener
United States v. Western Pacific Railroad
UNITED STATES v. WESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. et al. No. 18. Argued October 15, 1956. Decided December 3, 1956. Morton Hollander argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney
De Florio v. Michigan
November 23, 1956. No. 239. De Florio v. Michigan. Fred A. Smith for petitioner.
Seitz v. Toolan
No. 119. No. 155. No. 243. No. 311. No. 322. No. 35, No. 102, No. 176, Misc. Misc. Misc. Seitz et al. v. Toolan et al., Kleinman v. Kobler, doing business as Kobler Shaving Co., Shibley v. United States, A A A Dental Laboratories, Inc., et
Union Properties, Inc. v. Brennan
No. 392. Union Properties, Inc., v. Brennan, Successor Treasurer of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, et al. Thomas V. Koykka for petitioner. Frank T. Cullitan and Saul S. Danaceau for Brennan, respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.