Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1958 Cases
536 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Tucker v. California
No. 357, Misc. Tucker v. California.
Jeter v. United States
No. 323, Misc. Jeter v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.
Meadow Brook Club v. United States
No. 490. Meadow Brook Club v. United States. John H. Finn and William G. Mattison for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Morton and Roger P. Marquis for the United States.
Crosley Broadcasting Corp. v. WIBC, Inc.
No. 485. Crosley Broadcasting Corp. v. WIBC, Inc., et al. D. M. Patrick and E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin and John L. Fitzgerald for the Federal Communications Commission, and Thomas H. Wall, Earl R. Sta
Spano v. New York
No. 80, Misc. Spano v. New York. Bita D. Schechter for petitioner. Walter E. Dillon and Irving Anolik for respondent.
National Labor Relations Board v. Fant Milling Co.
No. 482. National Labor Relations Board v. Fant Milling Co. Solicitor General Rankin, Jerome D. Fenton, Thomas J. McDermott, Dominick L. Manoli and Frederick U. Reel for petitioner. O. B. Fisher for respondent.
Barr v. Matteo
No. 350. Barr v. Matteo et al. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Morton Hollander and Bernard Cedarbaum for petitioner. Byron N. Scott and Richard A. Mehler for respondents.
Schutte v. Nebraska
No. 14, Original. Schutte v. Nebraska et al.
Guerlain, Inc. v. United States
No. 24. No. 30. No. 31. Guerlain, Inc., v. United States; Parfums Corday, Inc., v. United States; and Lanvin Parfums, Inc., v. United States. Chauncey B. Garver and Charles C. Parlin, Jr. for appellant in No. 24. Samuel I. Rosenman, Seymour
James v. Todd
JAMES et al. v. TODD, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE AND INDUSTRIES OF ALABAMA. No. 464. Decided December 15, 1958. Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of Mississippi, W. E. McIntyre,, Jr., Special Assistant Attorney General, Frank M. Dixon and
Briggs v. City of Los Angeles
BRIGGS, doing business as WALT’S AUTO PARKS & GARAGES, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al. No. 453. Decided December 15, 1958. Morris Lavine for appellant. Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellees.
Evers v. Dwyer
EVERS et al. v. DWYER et al. No. 382. Decided December 15, 1958. Robert L. Carter for appellants. Walter Chandler, Allison B. Humphreys, Edward P. Russell and Charles M. Crump for appellees.
Leedom v. Kyne
LEEDOM et al., MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. KYNE. No. 14. Argued October 23, 1958. Decided December 15, 1958. Norton J. Come argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Jerome
Ladner v. United States
LADNER v. UNITED STATES. No. 2. Argued November 19, 1957. — Affirmed by an equally divided Court January 6, 1958. — Rehearing granted, judgment vacated and case restored to the calendar for reargument May 26, 1958. — Reargued October 22, 19
Flemming v. Florida Citrus Exchange
FLEMMING, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE, v. FLORIDA CITRUS EXCHANGE et al. No. 27. Argued November 17, 1958. Decided December 15, 1958. William W. Goodrich argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briéf were Solicitor
Flaxer v. United States
FLAXER v. UNITED STATES. No. 60. Argued November 19, 1958. Decided December 15, 1958. David Rein argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Joseph Forer. William Hitz argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were
American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Frisco Transportation Co.
AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., et al. v. FRISCO TRANSPORTATION CO. No. 15. Argued October 13, 1958. Decided December 15, 1958 Peter T. Beardsley argued the causes for appellants in Nos. 15 and 16. With him on a brief for appellants i
Hills v. Eisenhart
No. 232. No. 333. No. 101, Misc. No. 154, Misc. No. 216, Misc. Hills et al. v. Eisenhart et al., O'Rourke et al. v. Sill et al., Curry v. Ragan et al., Papworth v. United States, Ruby et ux. v. Bowlus,
In re Stafford
No. 289, Misc. In re Stafford.
McCune v. Adams
No. 169, Misc. McCune v. Adams, Warden.
Stapp v. Missouri
No. 58, Misc. Stapp v. Missouri.
Department of Highways v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.
No. 470. Department of Highways of Louisiana v. United Gas Pipe Line Co. W. Crosby Pegues, Jr. for petitioner. John M. Madison for respondent.
Kiamie v. United States
No. 478. Kiamie et al. v. United States. Theodore Kiendl, William R. Meagher and Philip C. Potter, Jr. for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice and Joseph F. Goetten for the United States.
Certain Interests in Property in Hillsborough County v. United States
No. 458. Certain Interests in Property in Hillsborough County, Florida, et al. v. United States. Chester H. Ferguson and John M. Allison for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Morton and Roger P. Marquis for t
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.