Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1960 Cases
525 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
New Hampshire Fire Insurance v. Scanlon
NEW HAMPSHIRE FIRE INSURANCE CO. v. SCANLON, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, et al. No. 339. Argued March 22, 1960. Decided April 25, 1960. Jack Hart argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Myron Engelman. Richard
Overton v. United States
April 20, 1960. No. 867, Misc. Overton v. United States. Robert C. Barnard for petitioner.
Faiola v. New Jersey
No. 630, Misc. Faiola v. New Jersey. Petitioner pro se. Bertram Polow for respondent.
Sims v. Smyth
No. 616, Misc. Sims v. Smyth, Superintendent, Virginia State Penitentiary.
Dobson v. Warden
No. 601, Misc. Dobson v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary. Petitioner pro se. C. Ferdinand, Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, and James H. Norris, Jr., Special Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Jefferson v. Adams
No. 436, Misc. Jefferson v. Adams, Warden. Petitioner pro se. W. W. Barron, Attorney General of West Virginia, and Fred H. C apian, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Walder v. Paramount Publix Corp.
No. 771. Walder et al. v. Paramount Publix Corp. et al. Claudia Pearl-man and Edgar A. Buttle for petitioners. John F. Caskey, Myles J. Lane, E. Compton Timberlake and Leonard Kaufman for respondents.
Horne v. Woolever
No. 747. Horne v. Woolever. Thomas F. Butler, Jr. and Milton Boesel for petitioner.
Wolfe v. National Lead Co.
No. 734. Wolfe et al. v. National Lead Co. Carl Hoppe and Robert B. Harmon for petitioners. Robert E. Bums, Milton Handler and John B. Henrich for respondent.
Green v. United States
No. 596, Misc. Green v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrovsky for the United States.
Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.
No. 748. No. 749. Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. et al. ; and National Coal Association et al. v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp. et al. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Samue
Black v. United States
No. 542, No. 586, No. 637, No. 648, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Black v. United States, et al.; McDaniel v. United States District Court for the District of New Mexico et al.; McDaniel v. California Adult Authority et al.; and In re Wilson. Sta
McNeal v. Culver
No. 765. McNeal v. Culver, State Prison Custodian. The motion of the petitioner for the appointment of counsel is granted and it is ordered that Sam Daniels, Esquire, of Miami, Florida, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel fo
Izzo v. Illinois
IZZO v. ILLINOIS. No. 772, Misc. Decided April 18, 1960.
Dusky v. United States
DUSKY v. UNITED STATES. No. 504, Misc. Decided April 18, 1960. James W. Benjamin for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.
Burlington-Chicago Cartage, Inc. v. United States
BURLINGTON-CHICAGO CARTAGE, INC., v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 726. Decided April 18, 1960. John E. Lesow for appellant. Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Beck, Robert W. Ginnane and Carroll T. Prince, Jr. for the U
Ward v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
WARD v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD CO. No. 485. Argued March 31, 1960. Decided April 18, 1960. Neal P. Rutledge argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Sam T. Dell, Jr. argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were L. Will
Niukkanen v. McAlexander
NIUKKANEN, alias MACKIE, v. McALEXANDER, ACTING DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE. No. 130. Argued March 21, 1960. Decided April 18, 1960. Joseph Foret and Neis Peterson argued the cause for petitioner. With Mr. Pete
Yancy v. United States
YANCY v. UNITED STATES. No. 47. Argued December 8-9, 1959. Decided April 18, 1960. Seymour B. Goldman argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. John L. Murphy argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor Gene
Mackey v. Mendoza-Martinez
MACKEY, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION, et al. v. MENDOZA-MARTINEZ. No. 29. Argued November 10, 1959. Decided April 18, 1960. Oscar H. Davis argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Ranki
Miller Music Corp. v. Charles N. Daniels, Inc.
MILLER MUSIC CORP. v. CHARLES N. DANIELS, INC. No. 214. Argued February 24-25, 1960. Decided April 18, 1960. Julian T. Abeles argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Milton A. Rudin argued the cause for respondent. With him on th
Marine Cooks & Stewards v. Panama Steamship Co.
MARINE COOKS & STEWARDS, AFL, et al. v. PANAMA STEAMSHIP CO., LTD., et al. No. 403. Argued March 2-3, 1960. Decided April 18, 1960. John Paul Jennings argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was J. Duane Vance. John D. Mosse
Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.
ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS et al. v. CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. No. 100. Argued March 1-2, 1960. Decided April 18, 1960. Lester P. Schoene argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Alex Elson, Brainerd Currie
Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.
No. 60. No. 613. No. 627. No. 635. Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc., The Deutsch Company v. National Labor Relations Board, Monday v. United States, Slusarz v. Cygan,
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.