Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1960 Cases
525 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Willett v. Commissioner
No. 470. Willett et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Charles I. Dawson for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, Robert N. Anderson and Morton K. Rothschild for respondent.
Preformed Line Products Co. v. Watson
No. 471. Preformed Line Products Co. v. Watson, Commissioner of Patents. Patrick H. Hume and C. Willard Hayes for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Alan S. Rosenthal for respondent.
Rhodes v. United States
No. 462. Rhodes v. United States. Samuel D. Lopinsky and Arthur T. Ciccarello for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Conner Air Lines, Inc. v. Aviation Credit Corp.
No. 452. Conner Air Lines, Inc., et al. v. Aviation Credit Corp. et al. Henry M. Sinclair and Don G. Nicholson for petitioners. Robert P. Smith, Robert V. Smith, John H. Wahl, Jr. and Laurence A. Schroeder for respondents.
Courier-Journal & Louisville Times Co. v. Curtis
No. 442. Courier-Journal & Louisville Times Co. v. Curtis, Judge, et al. Wilson W. Wyatt for petitioner. Robert P. Hobson and Leo T. Wolford for respondents.
Sachs v. United States
No. 439. Sachs v. United States. Bernard B. Laven for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wil-key, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrovsky for the United States.
Emmons v. Commissioner
No. 19. Emmons v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Kenneth W. Gemmill, Converse Murdoch and P. J. Di Quinzio for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin for respondent.
Herter v. Cort
No.-. Herter, Secretary of State, v. Cort. Solicitor General Rankin for the applicant. Leonard B. Boudin in opposition.
Pekao Trading Corp. v. Bragalini
PEKAO TRADING CORP. v. BRAGALINI et al. No. 483. Decided December 5, 1960. Arthur C. Fink for appellant.
Bandy v. United States
BANDY v. UNITED STATES. No. 171, Misc. Decided December 5, 1960. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice and Meyer Rothwacks for the United States.
Griffith v. California
GRIFFITH v. CALIFORNIA et al. No. 457. Decided December 5, 1960. J. B. Tietz for appellant. Robert E. Reed and R. B. Pegram for the State of California, and Roger Arneberg and Bourke Jones for the City of Los Angeles, appellees.
Beck v. Binks
BECK et al. v. BINKS, DIRECTOR OF DEPARTMENT OF REGISTRATION AND EDUCATION OF ILLINOIS. No. 461. Decided December 5, 1960. Edwin S. D. Butterfield for appellants. William L. Guild, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines and Raym
Kirschke v. City of Houston
KIRSCHKE et al. v. CITY OF HOUSTON. No. 426. Decided December 5, 1960. Bennett B. Patterson for appellants. R. H. Burks and Homer T. Bouldin for appellee.
Scott v. California
SCOTT v. CALIFORNIA. No. 241, Misc. Decided December 5, 1960. Morris Lavine for appellant. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, William B. McKesson and Lewis Watnick for appellee.
Boynton v. Virginia
BOYNTON v. VIRGINIA. No. 7. Argued October 12, 1960. Decided December 5, 1960. Thurgood Marshall argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Martin A. Martin, Clarence W. Newsome, Jack Greenberg, Louis H. Poliak and Constanc
Small Business Administration v. McClellan
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION v. McCLELLAN, TRUSTEE. No. 42. Argued November 9-10, 1960. Decided December 5, 1960. Morton Hollander argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin and Assistant Attorney
Frye v. New York
No. 469, Misc. Frye v. New York.
Wright v. Buchkoe
No. 206, Misc. Wright v. Buchkoe, Warden, et al. Petitioner pro se. Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, and Samuel J. Torina, Solicitor General, for respondents.
La Fever v. United States
No. 265, Misc. La Fever v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrovsky for the United States.
Schwenkhoff v. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance
No. 434. SCHWENKHOFF v. FARMERS MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE Insurance Co. Vaughn 8. Conway and Irving D. Gaines for petitioner. Clyde C. Cross for respondent.
General Development Corp. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.
No. 427. GENERAL Development Corp. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. Howell Van Auken for petitioner. Milton F. Mallender for respondent.
D. C. Hall Co. v. State Highway Commission
No. 421. D. C. Hall Co. v. State Highway Commission of Texas. T. S. Christopher for petitioner. Will Wilson, Attorney General of Texas, and C. K. Richards, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
American Natural Gas Co. v. United States
No. 384. American Natural Gas Co. et al. v. United States. Arthur R. Seder, Jr., Middleton Miller and Jules M. Perlberg for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Rice, Harry Baum and Joseph Kovner for the United
Warren v. Higgins
No. 413. No. 414. Warren et al., Executors, v. Higgins et al.; and Zahniser et al. v. Higgins et al. Lynne Anderson Warren for petitioners in No. 413. W. Walter Braham for petitioners in No. 414. Harold R. Schmidt and John L. Laubach, Jr. f
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.