Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1960 Cases
525 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Gregory v. New York
No. 247, Misc. Gregory v. New York. Petitioner pro se. William I. Siegel for respondent.
Cancel v. New York
No. 208, Misc. Cancel v. New York.
Roberts v. Maryland
No. 197, Misc. Roberts v. Maryland.
Crawford v. Lydick
No. 184, Misc. Crawford v. Lydick et al. Petitioner pro se. Richard H. Paulson for Lucien F. Sweet, Circuit Court Judge, respondent. William H. Culver and Louis R. Young for other individual respondents.
Menard v. Nash
No. 166, Misc. Menard v. Nash, Warden.
Early v. Colorado
No. 156, Misc. Early v. Colorado. Petitioner pro se. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and J. F. Brauer, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Berry v. Illinois
No. 137, Misc. Berry v. Illinois.
Zenger v. Schwartz
No. 122, Misc. Zenger v. Schwartz, Judge, et al.
Farley v. United States
No. 110, Misc. Farley v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.
Bayside Novelty Co. v. United States
No. 94, Misc. Bayside Novelty Co., Inc., et al. v. United States. Abraham Schwartz for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Karp v. United States
No. 82, Misc. Karp v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
Golla v. Delaware
No. 66, Misc. Golla v. Delaware.
Caldwell v. Maryland
No. 54, Misc. Caldwell v. Maryland.
Harden v. California
No. 34, Misc. Harden v. California. Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Arlo E. Smith and Albert W. Harris, Jr., Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.
Cutlip v. Adams
No. 25, Misc. Cutlip v. Adams, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Fred H. Caplan, Assistant Attorney General of West Virginia, for respondent.
Hochman v. United States
No. 296. Hochman v. United States. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted. Irving D. Gaines for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg a
First National Bank of Chippewa Falls v. Charles Henneman Co.
No. 283. First National Bank of Chippewa Falls et al. v. Charles Henneman Co. et al. Mr. Justice Whit-taker is of the opinion certiorari should be granted. Marshall Wiley for petitioners. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General
Bivins v. Gulf Oil Corp.
No. 292. Bivins v. Gulf Oil Corp. The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Black are of the opinion certiorari should be granted. Philip S. Kouri for petitioner. William L. Kerr for respondent.
Sorgel v. Commercial Credit Corp.
No. 134. Sorgel, Executor, et al. v. Commercial Credit Corp. Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted, the judgment vacated and the case remanded to the District Court for a completely new ju
Lucas v. DeLong Corp.
No. 299. Lucas v. DeLong Corporation. James B. Donovan and John P. Walsh for petitioner. Edward J. Ennis and John L. In-goldsby, Jr. for respondent.
Lana v. New York
No. 270. Lana v. New York. Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion certiorari should be granted. Frances Kahn for petitioner. Edward S. Silver for respondent.
Slavitt v. Meader
No. 295. Slavitt v. Meader et al. Charlotte Slavitt, petitioner, pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub and- John G. Laughlin, Jr. for respondents.
Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. Vandenbergh
No. 287. Allied Van Lines, Inc., v. Vandenbergh et al. Lloyd J. Skedd for petitioner. Ralph J. Anderson for respondents.
Yasa v. Esperdy
No. 277. Yasa v. Esperdy, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service. Abraham Lebenkoff for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.