Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1960 Cases
525 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Sun Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission
SUN OIL CO. v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION. No. 321. Argued April 26, 1960. Decided June 27, 1960. Leo J. Hoffman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Martin A. Row, Robert E. May and Omar L. Crook. Howard E. Wahrenbrock
Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission
SUNRAY MID-CONTINENT OIL CO. v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION. No. 335. Argued April 26-27, 1960. Decided June 27, 1960. Melvin Richter argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were M. Darwin Kirk, Homer E. McEwen, Jr. and Dale E.
Commissioner v. Gillette Motor Transport, Inc.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. GILLETTE MOTOR TRANSPORT, INC. No. 359. Argued April 21, 1960. Decided June 27, 1960. Wayne G. Barnett argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney Gener
Hertz Corp. v. United States
HERTZ CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR TO J. FRANK CONNOR, INC.) v. UNITED STATES. No. 283. Argued March 30, 1960. Decided June 27, 1960. Edgar Bernhard argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Boswell Magill, Harry N. Wyatt, Donal
Massey Motors, Inc. v. United States
MASSEY MOTORS, INC., v. UNITED STATES. No. 141. Argued March 30, 1960. Decided June 27, 1960. William, R. Frazier argued the cause for petitioner in No. 141. With him on the brief was James P. Hill. Howard A. Heffron argued the cause for th
United States v. Cannelton Sewer Pipe Co.
UNITED STATES v. CANNELTON SEWER PIPE CO. No. 513. Argued May 19, 1960. Decided June 27, 1960. Ralph S. Spritzer argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General
Gonzales v. United States
GONZALES v. UNITED STATES. No. 416. Argued May 2, 1960. Decided June 27, 1960. Hayden C. Covington argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Daniel M. Friedman argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor Gen
United States v. Dege
UNITED STATES v. DEGE et vir. No. 14. Argued October 20, 1959. Decided June 27, 1960. Jerome M. Feit argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey and Beatrice
Armstrong v. United States
ARMSTRONG et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 270. Argued March 28, 1960. Decided June 27, 1960. Burton R. Thorman argued thé cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Solomon Dimond. Samuel D. Slade argued the cause for the United States.
Continental Grain Co. v. Barge FBL-585
CONTINENTAL GRAIN CO. v. BARGE FBL-585 et al. No. 229. Argued April 20, 1960. Decided June 27, 1960. Eberhard P. Deutsch argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Malcolm W. Monroe and René H. Himel, Jr. George B. Matthews
American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United States
AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 74. Argued May 19, 1960. Decided June 27, 1960. Peter T. Beardsley argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Larry A. Esckilsen. Richard A. Solomon ar
United States v. Republic Steel Corp.
No. 56. No. 111. No. 164. No. 278. No. 817. No. 694, No. 732, No. 836, Misc. Misc. Misc. United States v. Republic Steel Corp. et al., Schaefer et al. v. United States, Levine v. United States, Needelman v. United States, Genovese v. United
Thomas v. Ragen
No. 861, Misc. Thomas v. Ragen, Warden. Gerald W. Getty and James J. Doherty for petitioner.
Pennsylvania ex rel. Bruno v. Cavell
No. 231, Misc. Pennsylvania ex rel. Bruno v. Cavell, Warden. Anne X. Alpern, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Frank P. Lawley, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Elsten v. United States
No. 1011, Misc. Elsten v. United States et al. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin for the United States.
In re Mercer
No. 975, Misc. In re Mercer.
Caballero v. Wilkins
No. 954, Misc. Caballero v. Wilkins, Warden.
In re Winchester
No. 948, Misc. In re Winchester. Petitioner pro se. Stanley Mosk, Attorney General of California, Doris H. Maier and Raymond M. Momboisse, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.
Locke v. Illinois
No. 937, Misc. Locke v. Illinois.
Fulwood v. United States
No. 910, Misc. Fulwood v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Kirby W. Patterson for the United States.
Dranow v. Committee on Character & Fitness in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
No. 870, Misc. Dranow v. Committee on Character and Fitness in the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department, et al.
McGrady v. Smyth
No. 768, Misc. McGrady v. Smyth, Superintendent, Virginia State Penitentiary. Petitioner pro se. A. S. Harrison, Jr., Attorney General of Virginia, for respondent.
Cooper v. District of Columbia
No. 707, Misc. Cooper et al. v. District of Columbia. James C. Newton for petitioner. Chester H. Gray, Milton D. Korman and Hubert B. Pair for respondent.
Mayfield v. South Carolina
No. 410, Misc. Mayfield v. South Carolina. Petitioner pro se. Daniel R. McLeod, Attorney General of South Carolina, James S. Verner, Assistant Attorney General, and James R. Mann for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.