Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1961 Cases
544 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
National Labor Relations Board v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.
No. 120. National Labor Relations Board v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc., et al. Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for petitioner. O. P. Easterwood, Jr. and Seth W. Morrison for respondents.
National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 85, Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n, AFL-CIO
No. 89. National Labor Relations Board v. Local Union No. 85, Sheet Metal Workers' International Association, AFL-CIO. Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for petitioner. Edwin M. Pearce for respondent.
Baker v. Carr
No. 103. Baker et al. v. Carr et al. Charles S. Rhyne and Z. T. Osborn, Jr. argued the cause for appellants. With them on the briefs were Hobart F. Atkins, Robert H. Jennings, Jr., J. W. Anderson, C. R. McClain, Harris A. Gilbert, E. K. Mea
Smith v. Smith
SMITH v. SMITH. No. 802. Decided May 1, 1961. J. W. Maxwell for appellant. Harold Henkel Smith for appellee.
Chaifetz v. United States
CHAIFETZ v. UNITED STATES. No. 695. Decided May 1, 1961. Abraham, Chaijetz and I. William, Stempil for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Meyer Rothwacks for the United States.
Anderson v. Alabama
ANDERSON v. ALABAMA. No. 326. Argued April 25-26, 1961. Decided May 1, 1961. Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Peter A. Hall, Fred D. Gray, Orzell Billingsley and Thurgood Marshall. David W. Clark,
Atchley v. California
ATCHLEY v. CALIFORNIA. No. 95. Argued April 25, 1961. Decided May 1, 1961. Rosalie S. Asher argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Doris H. Maier, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With her o
Alaska v. Arctic Maid
ALASKA v. ARCTIC MAID et al. No. 106. Argued March 23, 1961. Decided May 1, 1961. Gary Thurlow, Deputy Attorney General of Alaska, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Ralph E. Moody, Attorney General, and Richard A.
Kolovrat v. Oregon
KOLOVRAT et al. v. OREGON. No. 102. Argued March 30, 1961. Decided May 1, 1961. Lawrence S. Lesser argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Peter A. Schwabe. Catherine Zorn, Assistant Attorney General of Oregon, argued th
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes v. United States
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 681. Argued March 28, 1961. Decided May 1, 1961. William G. Mahoney argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Clarence M. Mulholland, Edward J.
Sauber v. Gliedman
No. 803. Sauber v. Gliedman. Barnabas F. Sears for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Alan S. Rosenthal and Kathryn H. Baldwin for respondent.
Navios Corp. v. National Maritime Union
No. 804. No. 805. Navios Corporation et al. v. National Maritime Union of America et al.; and Global Seamen’s Union v. National Maritime Union of America et al. Herbert Brownell, Earle K. Shawe, Samuel B. Fortenbaugh, Jr. and Wendell-W. Lan
Cronan v. Federal Communications Commission
No. 792. Cronan v. Federal Communications Commission. Lawrence Speiser and Shirley Fingerhood for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Max D. Paglin and Ruth V. Reel for respondent.
Estate of May v. Commissioner
No. 765. Estate of May v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Manley Fleischmann for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer and Robert N. Anderson for respondent.
Scalf v. Adams
No. 236, Misc. Scalf v. Adams, Warden.
Duncan v. California
April 24, 1961. No. 187. Duncan v. California. Ben Margolis and Charles B. Stewart, Jr. on the motion.
Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Carpentier
COMPLETE AUTO TRANSIT, INC., v. CARPENTIER, SECRETARY OF STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 750. Decided April 24, 1961. Larry A. Esckilsen and Edmund M. Brady for appellant. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Samuel H. Young and Raymo
Lush v. Commissioner of Education
LUSH v. COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION OF NEW YORK. No. 683. Decided April 24, 1961. Francis G. Hessney for appellant. Charles A. Brind for appellee. Max G. Morris for Board of Education Central School District No. 1, intervenor-appellee.
Smith v. Butler
SMITH v. BUTLER et al., TRUSTEES. No. 313. Argued March 27-28, 1961. Decided April 24, 1961. William S. Frates argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Harold B. Wahl argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was E.
Cohen v. Hurley
COHEN v. HURLEY. No. 84. Argued December 14-15, 1960. Decided April 24, 1961. Theodore Kiendl argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Denis M. Hurley, respondent, argued the cause pro se. With him on the brief were Michael A. Cas
In re Anastaplo
IN RE ANASTAPLO. No. 58. Argued December 14, 1960. Decided April 24, 1961. Petitioner argued the cause and filed a brief pro se. William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for the State of Illinois, responden
Konigsberg v. State Bar
KONIGSBERG v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA et al. No. 28. Argued December 14, 1960. Decided April 24, 1961. Edward Mosk argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Sam Rosenwein. Frank B. Belcher argued the cause for respondents.
Goldberg v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.
GOLDBERG, SECRETARY OF LABOR, v. WHITAKER HOUSE COOPERATIVE, INC., et al. No. 274. Argued March 30, 1961. Decided April 24, 1961. Bessie Margolin argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were former Solicitor General Rankin,
Stewart v. United States
STEWART v. UNITED STATES. No. 143. Argued February 21, 1961. Decided April 24, 1961. Edward, L. Carey argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Robert L. Ackerly and Walter E. Gillcrist. Carl W. Belcher argued the cause fo
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.