Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1961 Cases
544 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Goldberg v. United States
No. 355. Goldberg v. United States. Arnold Bauman for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.
Radio Corp. of America v. Association of Professional Engineering Personnel
No. 344. Radio Corporation of America v. Association of Professional Engineering Personnel et al. Bernard G. Segal and Samuel D. Slade for petitioner. Arthur S. Key ser for respondents.
Colle v. United States
No. 333. Colle v. United States. O. B. Cline, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
U. S. Health Club, Inc. v. Major
No. 322. U. S. Health Club, Inc., v. Major, Postmaster, Bergenfield, New Jersey. Milton A. Bass, Solomon H. Friend and Harold Friedman for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick and John G. Laughlin, Jr. for re
Guzman v. Ruiz Pichirilo
No. 358. Guzman v. Ruiz Pichirilo. Max Goldman for petitioner. Seymour P. Edgerton for respondent.
Drews v. Maryland
No. 71. No. 84. No. 315. Drews et al. v. Maryland, Turner v. City of Memphis et al., Tinsley v. City of Richmond
Arizona v. California
No. 8, Original. Arizona v. California et al. [For earlier orders herein, see 344 U. S. 806, 919; 345 U. S. 914, 968; 347 U. S. 985, 986; 348 U. S. 947; 350 U. S. 114, 812, 880, 955; 351 U. S. 977; 354 U. S. 918; 357 U. S. 902; 364 U. S. 94
Winkle v. Bannan
WINKLE v. BANNAN, WARDEN. No. 93, Misc. Decided November 6, 1961. Petitioner pro se. Paul L. Adams, Attorney General of Michigan, Joseph B. Bilitzke, Solicitor General, and Robert Weinbaum, Assistant Solicitor General, for respondent.
Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Gerosa
TWENTIETH CENTURY-FOX FILM CORP. v. GEROSA, COMPTROLLER OF NEW YORK CITY. No. 373. Decided November 6, 1961. William W. Owens for appellant. Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Morris L. Heath for appellee.
Schroeder v. Williams
SCHROEDER et al. v. WILLIAMS et al. No. 357. Decided November 6, 1961. James A. Lake, Sr. and Roy Harr op for appellants. Charles Thone and Clark O’Hanlon for appellees.
Pepe v. Delaware
PEPE v. DELAWARE. No. 345. Decided November 6, 1961. John Merwin Bader for petitioner.
Department of Revenue v. United States
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF ILLINOIS et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 245. Decided November 6, 1961. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Raymond S. Sarnow and A. Zola Groves, Assistant Attorneys General, for
Martin v. Walton
MARTIN v. WALTON, PROBATE JUDGE OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS. No. 30. Argued October 17, 1961. Decided November 6, 1961. Howard E. Payne argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were F. L. Hagaman and John Seurlock. J. Donald Lys
Roper v. United States
ROPER v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 16. Argued October 12, 16, 1961. Decided November 6, 1961. Sidney H. Kelsey argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Leavenworth Colby argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs
Wallach v. United States
October 31, 1961. No. 328. Wallach v. United States. Jacob Rassner for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Greenberg v. Panama Transport Co.
No. 320. Greenberg v. Panama Transport Co. et al. Francis H. Farrell for petitioner. Walter X. Connor, James P. O’Neill and Joseph F. Dolan for respondents.
Firestone v. Aluminum Co. of America
No. 184. No. 316. Firestone v. Aluminum Company of America et al.; and Aluminum Company of America et al. v. Sperry Products, Inc., et al. Albert B. Teare for petitioner in No. 184 and for respondent Firestone in No. 316. Carlton Hill for p
Dunlap v. Spilka
No. 291. Dunlap et al. v. Spilka, Trustee in Bankruptcy. Joseph E. Finley and Mortimer Riemer for petitioners. Welles K. Stanley for respondent.
Vaughan v. Atkinson
No. 323. Vaughan v. Atkinson et al. Jacob L. Morewitz for petitioner. Barron F. Black for respondents.
Metlakatla Indian Community v. Egan
No. 2. No. 3. Metlakatla Indian Community, Annette Island Reserve, v. Egan, Governor of Alaska, et al.; and Organized Village of Kake et al. v. Egan, Governor of Alaska. Richard Schifter and Theodore H. Little for appellant in No. 2. John H
Campbell v. Hussey
No. 42. Campbell, Commissioner of Agriculture of Georgia, et al. v. Hussey et al. Solicitor General Cox on the motion.
DeGregory v. Attorney General of New Hampshire
DeGREGORY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. No. 237, Misc. Decided October 23, 1961. Howard S. Whiteside for appellant. Gardner C. Turner, Attorney General of New Hampshire, pro se.
Tinsley v. City of Richmond
TINSLEY v. CITY OF RICHMOND. No. 315. Decided October 23, 1961. Martin A. Martin, Thurgood Marshall, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and Charles L. Black, Jr. for appellant. J. E. Drinard for appellee.
American Chicle Co. v. State Tax Commission
AMERICAN CHICLE CO. v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF NEW YORK. No. 301. Decided October 23, 1961. Leo A. Diamond for appellant. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Paxton Blair, Solicitor General, and Robert W. Bush, Assistant Attor
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.