Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1962 Cases
563 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Eastern Express, Inc. v. United States
EASTERN EXPRESS, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 623. Decided February 26, 1962. Bryce Rea, Jr., Roland Rice and Homer S. Carpenter for appellants. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loevinger, Richard A. Solomon, Ro
Strelich v. Heinze
STRELICH v. HEINZE, WARDEN, et al. No. 868, Misc. Decided February 26, 1962.
In re Shuttlesworth
IN RE SHUTTLESWORTH. No. 1073, Misc. Decided February 26, 1962. William M. Kunstler for petitioner.
Bailey v. Patterson
BAILEY et al. v. PATTERSON et al. No. 643. Decided February 26, 1962. Constance Baker Motley, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and R. Jess Brown for appellants. Dugas Shands and Edward L. Cates, Assistant Attorneys General of Mississippi
Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local Unions Nos. 128 & 633 v. Lion Dry Goods, Inc.
RETAIL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, LOCAL UNIONS NOS. 128 AND 633, v. LION DRY GOODS, INC., et al. No. 73. Argued January 17, 1962. Decided February 26, 1962. S. O. Lip-pman argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were
Richards v. United States
RICHARDS et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 59. Argued November 15, 1961. Decided February 26, 1962. Truman B. Rucker argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Edward M. O’Brien. Richard J. Medalie argued the cause for th
Leach v. Florida
No. 825, Misc. Leach et al. v. Florida. Thomas A. Larkin for petitioners.
Barnes v. Director of the Patuxent Institution
No. 840, Misc. Barnes v. Director of the Patuxent Institution.
Haynes v. Virginia
No. 829, Misc. Haynes v. Virginia.
Hanley v. Langlois
No. 798, Misc. Hanley v. Langlois, Warden.
Henson v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
No. 788, Misc. Henson v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary.
Ellis v. Raines
No. 768, Misc. Ellis v. Raines, Warden.
In re Disbarment of Santana
No. 752, Misc. In re Disbarment of Santana.
Gaito v. Pennsylvania
No. 735, Misc. Gaito et al. v. Pennsylvania.
Williams v. United States
No. 720, Misc. Williams v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Washington v. California Adult Authority
No. 692, Misc. Washington v. California Adult Authority.
Ellington v. New York
No. 676, Misc. Ellington v. New York.
Troiani v. New York
No. 657, Misc. Troiani v. New York.
Lane v. Maryland
No. 631, Misc. Lane v. Maryland.
Craig v. United States
No. 617, Misc. Craig v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
Nunley v. United States
No. 538, Misc. Nunley v. United States. Petitioner, pro se. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
Williams v. Ball
No. 576. Williams et al. v. Ball, District Attorney of Erie County. Peter L. Panino for petitioners. Respondent pro se.
Woerner v. City of Indianapolis
No. 662. Woerner et al. v. City of Indianapolis. Freeman Bradford and James W. Ingles for petitioners. Charles S. Rhyne and John J. Dillon for respondent.
Underwriters at Lloyd's, London v. Rand
No. 637. Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London, et al. v. Rand. Frank A. Bull and Joseph P. Sullivan for petitioners. Leo T. Kissam for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.