Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1964 Cases
641 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Mitchell v. City of Charleston
MITCHELL et al. v. CITY OF CHARLESTON. No. 8. Decided June 22, 1964. Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III, Matthew J. Perry, Lincoln C. Jenkins, Jr. and John H. Wrighten for petitioners. Robert L. Clement, Jr. for res
Green v. Virginia
GREEN et al. v. VIRGINIA. No. 761. Decided June 22, 1964. Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III and Roland D. Ealey for petitioners. Reno S. Harp III, Assistant Attorney General of Virginia, for respondent.
Rogers v. United States
ROGERS v. UNITED STATES. No. 1011, Misc. Decided June 22, 1964. James T. Moran for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States.
Williams v. North Carolina
WILLIAMS v. NORTH CAROLINA. No. 4. Decided June 22, 1964. Leonard B. Boudin, Victor Rabinowitz and Conrad J. Lynn for petitioner. T. W. Bruton, Attorney General of North Carolina, and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Drews v. Maryland
DREWS et al. v. MARYLAND. No. 3. Decided June 22, 1964. Robert B. Watts, Francis D. Murnaghan, Jr. and Jack Greenberg for appellants. Thomas B. Finan, Attorney General of Maryland, and Joseph S. Kaufman, Deputy Attorney General, for appelle
Cooper v. Pate
COOPER v. PATE, WARDEN. No. 1134, Misc. Decided June 22, 1964. Alex Elson and Bernard Weisberg for petitioner. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Raymond S. Sarnow and Edward A. Berman, Assistant Attorneys General, for resp
Leonard v. United States
LEONARD v. UNITED STATES. No. 1017, Misc. Decided June 22, 1964. John G. Clancy for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox for the United States.
Aldrich v. Aldrich
ALDRICH v. ALDRICH et al. No. 55. Argued October 24,1963. Decided November 12, 1963, that questions be certified to Supreme Court of Florida. Questions certified to Supreme Court of Florida December 16, 1963.— Decided June 22, 1964. Herman
Dresner v. City of Tallahassee
DRESNER et al. v. CITY OF TALLAHASSEE. No. 35. Argued October 23, 1963. Questions certified to Supreme Court of Florida December 2, 1963. Decided June 22, 1964. Howard Dixon and Carl Rachlin argued the cause for petitioners. With them on th
Berman v. United States
BERMAN v. UNITED STATES. No. 245. Argued March 26, 1964. Decided June 22, 1964. Bernard B. Polak argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief was Irwin L. Germaise. Theodore George Gilinsky argued the cause for the United States. With him
Aptheker v. Secretary of State
APTHEKER et al. v. SECRETARY OF STATE. No. 461. Argued April 21, 1964. Decided June 22, 1964. John J. Abt and Joseph Forer argued the cause and filed briefs for appellants. Abram Chayes argued the cause for appellee. With him on the brief w
Escobedo v. Illinois
ESCOBEDO v. ILLINOIS. No. 615. Argued April 29, 1964. Decided June 22, 1964. Barry L. Kroll argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Donald M. Haskell. James R. Thompson argued the cause for respondent. With him on the bri
States v. Continental Can Co.
UNITED STATES v. CONTINENTAL CAN CO. et al. No. 367. Argued April 28, 1964. Decided June 22, 1964. Ralph S. Spritzer argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Lionel
Jackson v. Denno
JACKSON v. DENNO, WARDEN. No. 62. Argued December 9-10, 1963. Decided June 22, 1964. Daniel G. Collins argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. William, I. Siegel argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Edward S
Bouie v. City of Columbia
BOUIE et al. v. CITY OF COLUMBIA. No. 10. Argued October 14-15, 1963. Decided June 22, 1964. Matthew J. Perry, Constance Baker Motley and Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the brief were James M. Nabrit III, Char
Bell v. Maryland
BELL et al. v. MARYLAND. No. 12. Argued October 14-15, 1963. Decided June 22, 1964. Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III, Charles L. Black, Jr., Juanita Jack
A Quantity of Copies of Books v. Kansas
A QUANTITY OF COPIES OF BOOKS et al. v. KANSAS. No. 449. Argued April 1-2, 1964. Decided June 22, 1964. Stanley Fleishman argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Sam Rosenwein. William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Ka
Jacobellis v. Ohio
JACOBELLIS v. OHIO. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP OHIO. No. 11. Argued March 26, 1963. Restored to the calendar for reargument April 29, 1963. Reargued April 1, 1964. Decided June 22, 1964. Ephraim London reargued the cause for appellant
States v. Penn-Olin Chemical Co.
UNITED STATES v. PENN-OLIN CHEMICAL CO. et al. No. 503. Argued April 30, 1964. Decided June 22, 1964. Solicitor General Cox argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attor ney General Orrick, Philip B. Hey
Robinson v. Florida
ROBINSON et al. v. FLORIDA. No. 60. Argued October 15, 1963. Decided June 22, 1964. Alfred I. Hopkins and Jack Greenberg argued the cause for appellants. With Mr. Hopkins on the briefs were Tobias Simon and Howard W. Dixon. George B. Georgi
Barr v. City of Columbia
BARR et al. v. CITY OF COLUMBIA. No. 9. Argued October 14-15, 1963. Decided June 22, 1964. Matthew J. Perry, Constance Baker Motley and Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the brief were James M. Nabrit III, Charle
Fallen v. United States
FALLEN v. UNITED STATES. No. 210. Argued April 30, 1964. Decided June 22, 1964. Isaac N. Groner, by appointment of the Court, 376 U. S. 940, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Philip B. Heymann argued the cause for the Unite
Griffin v. Maryland
GRIFFIN et al. v. MARYLAND. No. 6. Argued November 5, 7, 1962. Restored to the calendar for reargument May 20, 1963. Reargued October 14-15, 1963. Decided June 22, 1964. Joseph L. Ranh, Jr. and Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner
Parden v. Terminal Railway of the Alabama State Docks Department
No. 157. No. 204. No. 931. No. 980. No. 991. No. 112, No. 1081, No. 1107, No. 1144, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Parden et al. v. Terminal Railway of the Alabama State Docks Department et al., United States v. Aluminum Co. of America et al., Lyn
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.