Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1965 Cases
590 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Gold v. DiCarlo
GOLD et al. v. DiCARLO, COMMISSIONER OF LICENSES OF CITY OF NEW YORK, et al. No. 901. Decided April 26, 1965. Jesse Moss for appellants. Leo A. Larkin and Seymour B. Quel for DiCarlo, and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, pr
Callender v. Florida
CALLENDER et al. v. FLORIDA. No. 58. Decided April 26, 1965. Carl Rachlin and Floyd McKissick for petitioners. James W. Kynes, Attorney General of Florida, and George R. GeorgiejJ, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Texas v. New Jersey
TEXAS v. NEW JERSEY et al. No. 13, Original. Decided February 1, 1965. Decree entered April 26, 1965.
Veterans of Abraham Lincoln Brigade v. Subversive Activities Control Board
VETERANS OF THE ABRAHAM LINCOLN BRIGADE v. SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES CONTROL BOARD. No. 65. Argued December 9, 1964. Decided April 26, 1965. Leonard B. Boudin argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Victor Rabinowitz and Da
American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born v. Subversive Activities Control Board
AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR PROTECTION OF FOREIGN BORN v. SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES CONTROL BOARD. No. 44. Argued December 8-9, 1964. Decided April 26, 1965. Joseph Forer argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was David Rein. Bruce
Dombrowski v. Pfister
DOMBROWSKI et al. v. PFISTER, CHAIRMAN, JOINT LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE ON UNAMERICAN ACTIVITIES OF THE LOUISIANA LEGISLATURE, et al. No. 52. Argued January 25, 1965. Decided April 26, 1965. Leon Hubert and Arthur Kinoy argued the cause for app
Hanna v. Plumer
HANNA v. PLUMER, EXECUTOR. No. 171. Argued January 21, 1965. Decided April 26, 1965. Albert P. Zabin argued the cause for petitioner, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court. With him on the brief was George Welch. James J. Fitzpatrick argu
American Oil Co. v. Neill
AMERICAN OIL CO. v. NEILL et al. No. 19. Argued January 25-26, 1965. Decided April 26, 1965. Frank I. Goodman argued the cause for appellant and for the United States, as amicus curiae. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Ass
Graves v. Texas
No. 893, Misc. Graves v. Texas. Peter Sanchez-Navarro, Jr., for petitioner. Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, Stanton Stone, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Howard M. F
Watson v. Colorado
No. 632, Misc. Watson v. Colorado. Petitioner pro se. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Attorney General, and James W. Creamer, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Burton Mercantile & Gin Co. v. Wirtz
No. 910. Burton Mercantile & Gin Co., Inc. v. Wirtz, Secretary of Labor. Wayne Boyce and Fred M. Pickens, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Cox, Charles Donahue, Bessie Margolin, Robert E. Nagle and Isabelle R. Cappello for respondent.
Rupe v. Wallace
No. 928. Rupe et al., Trustees, et al. v. Wallace et al. Claude A. Roth for petitioners. Robert A. Sprecher for respondents.
Hastings v. Mann
No. 911. Hastings v. Mann, trading as Mann's Harbor Marina. Walter B. Martin, Jr., for petitioner. Gerald F. White for respondent.
China Liquor Distributing Co. v. United States
No. 873. China Liquor Distributing Co. et al. v. United States. Abraham Gottfried for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Douglas and Alan 8. Rosen-thal for the United States.
Ginzburg v. United States
No. 807. Ginzburg et al. v. United States. David I. Shapiro and Sidney Dickstein for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Marshall Tamor Golding for the United States. Melvin L. Wulf
In re Simmons
April 5, 1965. No. -. In re Simmons.
U. S. A. C. Transport, Inc. v. United States
U. S. A. C. TRANSPORT, INC. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 856. Decided April 5, 1965. Paul F. Sullivan for appellant. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Jerry Z. Pruzansky, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty
McKinnie v. Tennessee
McKINNIE et al. v. TENNESSEE. No. 148. Argued March 8, 1965. Decided April 5, 1965. James M. Nabrit III argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, Avon N. Williams, Z. Alexander Loo
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY CO. v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL & PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. et al. No. 21. Argued November 17, 1964. Decided April 5, 1965. John C. Danielson argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Jordan J
Abernathy v. Alabama
ABERNATHY et al. v. ALABAMA. No. 9. Argued October 12-13, 1964. Decided April 5, 1965. Louis H. Poliak argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit III, Fred D. Gray an
Jenkins v. United States
JENKINS v. UNITED STATES. No. 761. Argued April 1, 1965. Decided April 5, 1965. H. Thomas Sisk argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were M. Michael Cramer and David B. Isbell. Philip B. Heymann argued the cause for the Uni
National Labor Relations Board v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. No. 98. Argued January 21, 1965. Decided April 5, 1965. Daniel M. Friedman argued the cause for petitioner. On the briefs were Solicitor General Cox, Arnold Ordman, Dominick
Burnett v. New York Central Railroad
BURNETT v. NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. No. 437. Argued March 11, 1965. Decided April 5, 1965. Douglas G. Cole argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Otto F. Putnick. Roy W. Short argued the cause and filed a brief for
Douglas v. Alabama
DOUGLAS v. ALABAMA. No. 313. Argued March 9-10, 1965. Decided April 5, 1965. Charles Cleveland argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Bryan A. Chancey and Robert 8. Gordon. Paul T. Gish, Jr., Assistant Attorney General
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.