Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 269,348+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1966 Cases
682 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
New England Motor Rate Bureau, Inc. v. United States
NEW ENGLAND MOTOR RATE BUREAU, INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 591. Decided December 5, 1966. Peter T. Beardsley, R. Edwin Brady, Bryce Rea, Jr., Guy H. Postell, John W. McFadden, Harry C. Ames, Roland Rice, Homer S. Carpenter, Joh
Long v. District Court of Iowa
LONG v. DISTRICT COURT OF IOWA in and for LEE COUNTY. No. 77. Argued November 9, 1966. Decided December 5, 1966. Ronald L. Carlson, by appointment of the Court, 383 U. S. 956, argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Don R. Bennett
Watkins v. Conway
WATKINS v. CONWAY. No. 65. Argued November 9, 1966. Decided December 5, 1966. William G. Vance argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Emmet J. Bondurant II. Martin McFarland argued the cause and filed a brief for appellee
Canada Packers, Ltd. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
CANADA PACKERS, LTD. v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. et al. No. 11. Argued November 8-9, 1966. Decided December 5, 1966. Charles B. Myers argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Harvey Huston argued the cause and filed
Transportation-Communication Employees Union v. Union Pacific Railroad
TRANSPORTATION-COMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES UNION v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. No. 28. Argued October 19, 1966. Decided December 5, 1966. Milton Kramer argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the. briefs were Lester P. Schoene and Martin W
United States v. Demko
UNITED STATES v. DEMKO. No. 76. Argued November 8, 1966. Decided December 5, 1966. Richard S. Salzman argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Robert
United States v. Acme Process Equipment Co.
UNITED STATES v. ACME PROCESS EQUIPMENT CO. No. 86. Argued November 9, 1966. Decided December 5, 1966. Solicitor General Marshall argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Richard
Bond v. Floyd
BOND et al. v. FLOYD et al. No. 87. Argued November 10, 1966. Decided December 5, 1966. Howard Moore, Jr., and Leonard B. Boudin argued the cause for appellants. With them on the briefs was Victor Rabinowitz. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney Gene
Harris v. Maroney
No. 333, Misc. No. 404, Misc. No. 412, Misc. No. 451, Misc. No. 496, Misc. Harris v. Maroney, Correctional Superintendent, Glaser v. California, Daughtry v. United States, Sesler v. Florida, Weiss v. Morgenthau, U. S. Attorney,
Gunston v. United States
No. 1637, Mise. October Term, 1965. No. 28, Original. No. 108. No. 117. No. 119. No. 124. No. 129. No. 217. No. 261. No. 276. No. 282. No. 286. No. 316. No. 340. No. 67, Mise. No. 134, Mise. No. 226, Mise. No. 298, Mise. Gunston v. United S
McCutcheon v. Beto
No. 543, Mise. McCutcheon v. Beto, Corrections Director. Petitioner pro se. Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, T. B. Wright, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Howard M. Fe
Gemmel v. Buchkoe
No. 439, Mise. Gemmel v. Buchkoe, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Curtis O. Beck, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Martin v. Texas
No. 225, Mise. Martin v. Texas. Joseph Earl Jackson for petitioner. Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, T. B. Wright, Executive Assistant Attorney General, and Howard M. Fender and
Board of Supervisors of Prince Edward County v. Griffin
No. 562. Board of Supervisors of Prince Edward County et al. v. Griffin et al. J. Segar Gravatt and Wm. F. Watkins, Jr., for petitioners.
First Hardin National Bank v. Fort Knox National Bank
No. 588. First Hardin National Bank et al. v. Fort Knox National Bank et al. Edgar A. Zingman for petitioners. Robert E. Hatton for Fort Knox National Bank, and Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Doolittle, David
Troiano v. United States
No. 576. Troiano v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States.
Viscardi v. United States
No. 519. No. 527. No. 603. Viscardi v. United States; Pacelli v. United States; and Armone et al. v. United States. Theodore Gilbert for petitioner in No. 519. E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr., Robert Kasnof and Albert J. Krieger for petitioner in
Bandy v. United States Attorney General
No. 394, Mise. Bandy v. United States Attorney General. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Rogovin, Meyer Rothwacks and Richard B. Buhrman for respondent.
Fortson v. Morris
November 21, 1966. No. —. Fortson, Secretary of State of Georgia v. Morris et al. Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, G. Ernest Tidwell, Executive Assistant Attorney General, Harold N. Hill, Jr., and Coy B. Johnson, Assistant Att
Battaglia v. United States
BATTAGLIA et al., dba PRODUCE TRANSPORT DISPATCH v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 564. Decided November 21, 1966. Earle V. White for appellants. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert Ginnane and
Badgley v. Hare
BADGLEY et al. v. HARE, SECRETARY OF STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al. No. 505. Decided November 21, 1966. William T. Gossett for appellants. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Curtis G. Beck
Bank of Marin v. England
BANK OF MARIN v. ENGLAND, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY. No. 63. Argued October 20, 1966. Decided November 21, 1966. Edgar B. Washburn argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Carlos R. Freitas and Bryan R. McCarthy. Thomas B. D
Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham
SHUTTLESWORTH v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM. No. 5. Argued October 11, 1965. Decided November 15, 1966. James M. Nabrit III argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Norman C. Amaker, Peter A. Hall, Orzell Billings
Colbert v. United States
No. 61, Mise. No. 97, Mise. No. 227, Mise. No. 265, Mise. No. 368, Mise. No. 419, Mise. No. 424, Mise. No. 460, Mise. No. 480, Mise. No. 490, Mise. No. 495, Mise. No. 500, Mise. Colbert v. United States, Sliva v. Pennsylvania, Bates v. Vete
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.