Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1967 Cases
756 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Sealy, Inc.
UNITED STATES v. SEALY, INC. No. 9. Argued April 20, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967. Daniel M. Friedman argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Richard A. Posner
Walker v. City of Birmingham
WALKER et al. v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM. No. 249. Argued March 13-14, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967. Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were James M. Nabrit III, Norman C. Amaker, Leroy D. Clark, Charles Steph
Stovall v. Denno
STOVALL v. DENNO, WARDEN. No. 254. Argued February 16, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967. Leon B. Polsky argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. William Cahn argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent. II. Richard Uviller argued
Gilbert v. California
GILBERT v. CALIFORNIA. No. 223. Argued February 15-16, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967. Luke McKissack argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Norman H. Sokolow, Deputy Attorney General of California, and William E. James, Assistant A
United States v. Wade
UNITED STATES v. WADE. No. 334. Argued February 16, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967. Beatrice Rosenberg argued the cause for the United States. With her on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Nat
National Labor Relations Board v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. ALLIS-CHALMERS MANUFACTURING CO. et al. No. 216. Argued March 15, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967. Solicitor General Marshall argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Robert S. Rijkind, Arnol
Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts
CURTIS PUBLISHING CO. v. BUTTS. No. 37. Argued February 23, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967 Mr. Justice Black, joined by Mr. Justice Douglas, concluded that in order to dispose of No. 150 he concurs in the grounds stated by The Chief Justice wh
Berger v. New York
BERGER v. NEW YORK. No. 615. Argued April 13, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967. Joseph E. Brill argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Abraham Glasser. H. Richard Uviller argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief
National Labor Relations Board v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. GREAT DANE TRAILERS, INC. No. 781. Argued April 19, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967. Arnold Ordman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Marshall, Dominick L. Manoli and
Washington v. Texas
WASHINGTON v. TEXAS. No. 649. Argued March 15-16, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967. Charles W. Tessmer argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Emmett Colvin, Jr. Howard M. Fender, Assistant Attorney General of Texas, argued th
Loving v. Virginia
LOVING et ux. v. VIRGINIA. No. 395. Argued April 10, 1967. Decided June 12, 1967. Bernard S. Cohen and Philip J. Hirschlcop argued the cause and filed a brief for appellants. Mr. Hirschkop argued pro hac vice, by special leave of Court. R.
Utah Pie Co. v. Continental Baking Co.
No. 18. Utah Pie Co. v. Continental Baking Co. et al.,
Prendez v. California
No. 1667, Misc. Prendez v. California.
Fee v. United States
No. 1501, Misc. Fee v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Shane v. United States
No. 1233, Misc. Shane v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Reginelli v. Pennsylvania
No. 1309. Reginelli v. Pennsylvania.
Romano v. United States
No. 1282. Romano v. United States. Abraham Glasser and Jerome Lewis for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Rush v. United States
No. 1238. Rush et al. v. United States.
Domany v. Otis Elevator Co.
No. 1184. Domany et al. v. Otis Elevator Co. et al. Edward I. Stillman for petitioners. Sumner Canary for Otis Elevator Co., and Russell E. Leasure for Sears, Roebuck & Co., respondents.
Green v. Hooey
No. 1738, Misc. Green v. Hooey, Judge, et al.
In re Disbarment of Rekeweg
No. 1346, Misc. In re Disbarment of Rekeweg.
Camodeo v. United States
CAMODEO v. UNITED STATES. No. 1073, Misc. Decided June 5, 1967. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States.
Gills v. California
GILLS v. CALIFORNIA. No. 1043, Misc. Decided June 5, 1967. Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Edsel W. Haws and Daniel J. Kremer, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.
Aluminum Co. of America v. United States
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 1159. Decided June 5, 1967. Dickson R. Loos for appellants. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodma
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.