Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1967 Cases
756 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Sullivan v. United States
No. 768. Sullivan et ux. v. United States. Edgar Shook for petitioners. Solicitor General Marshall and Assistant Attorney General Rogovin for the United States.
Wirtz v. Local 153, Glass Bottle Blowers Ass'n
No. 1115. Wirtz, Secretary of Labor v. Local 153, Glass Bottle Blowers Association of the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Sanders, Nathan Lewin, Alan S. Rosenthal, Robert V. Zener an
Bryans v. United States
No. 1623, Misc. Bryans v. United States.
Utah v. United States
No. 31, Original. Utah v. United States. Phil L. Hansen, Attorney General of Utah, on the motion. Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
Colacasides v. Michigan
May 15, 1967. No. -. Colacasides v. Michigan. Joseph W. Louisell and Ivan E. Ranis for applicant. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, and Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, for the State of Michigan, in opposition.
Wirtz v. Local Unions Nos. 9, 9-A, & 9-B, International Union of Operating Engineers
WIRTZ, SECRETARY OF LABOR v. LOCAL UNIONS NOS. 9, 9-A, & 9-B, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS. No. 1116. Decided May 15, 1967. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Sanders, Nathan Lewin, Alan S. Rosenthal, Rober
Blankenship v. Holding
BLANKENSHIP et al. v. HOLDING, dba GRAND NEWS. No. 1089. Decided May 15, 1967. Charles Nesbitt, Attorney General of Oklahoma, and Jeff Hartmann, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants. Samuel W. Block, Thomas P. Sullivan and Paul C. Dun
Holding v. Blankenship
HOLDING, dba GRAND NEWS v. BLANKENSHIP et al. No. 1088. Decided May 15, 1967. Samuel W. Block, Thomas P. Sullivan and Paul C. Duncan for appellant.
American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. United States
AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 1046. Decided May 15, 1967. Peter T. Beardsley and Harry J. Jordan for appellant. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. G
Banks v. California
BANKS v. CALIFORNIA. No. 889, Misc. Decided May 15, 1967. Petitioner pro se. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Charles W. Rumph, Deputy Attorney General, for respondent.
Gerberding v. Tahash
GERBERDING v. TAHASH, WARDEN. No. 1059, Misc. Decided May 15, 1967. Petitioner pro se.t Douglas M. Head, Attorney General of Minnesota, William J. Hempel, Deputy Attorney General, and Gerard W. Snell, Acting Solicitor General, for responden
Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. United States
AERO MAYFLOWER TRANSIT CO., INC. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 1136. Decided May 15, 1967. Henry P. Sailer and James L. Beattey for appellant. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane
Iacurci v. Lummus Co.
IACURCI v. LUMMUS CO. No. 6, Misc. Decided May 15, 1967. Arnold B. Elkind for petitioner. Raymond L. Falls, Jr., for respondent.
Dombrowski v. Eastland
DOMBROWSKI et al. v. EASTLAND et al. No. 118. Argued February 20, 1967. Decided May 15, 1967. Arthur Kinoy argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was William M. Kunstler. Roger Robb argued the cause for respondents. With hi
In re Gault
IN RE GAULT et al. No. 116. Argued December 6, 1966. Decided May 15, 1967. Norman Dorsen argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Melvin L. Wulj, Amelia D. Lewis and Daniel A. Rezneck. Frank A. Parks, Assistant Attorney G
Krantz v. Olin
No. 1044. No. 1066. No. 857, No. 987, No. 933, No. 1120, No. 1190, No. 1264, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Krantz et al. v. Olin, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission et al. v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co., Lupino v. Tahash, Warden, Az
Louie v. Washington
No. 1503, Misc. Louie v. Washington.
Roberts v. United States
No. 1483, Misc. Roberts v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General 'Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Shaw v. New Jersey
No. 1461, Misc. Shaw v. New Jersey.
Randall v. California
No. 1440, Misc. Randall v. California.
Williams v. United States
No. 1385, No. 1390, Misc. Misc. Williams v. United States; and Gitlitz v. United States. Petitioner pro se in No. 1385, Mise., and Leon B. Polsky for petitioner in No. 1390, Mise. Solicitor Génerál Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinso
Muncy v. General Motors Corp.
No. 915. Muncy et vir v. General Motors Corp. Franklin Jones for petitioners. Leon Jawor ski and Sam H. Hood for respondent.
Pinkowski v. Coglay
No. 30. Pinkowski v. Coglay, dba Mohawk Equipment Co. John G. Phillips for petitioner. Herbert C. Brook for respondent.
Wisconsin ex rel. Rizzo v. County Court of Kenosha County
No. 1193. Wisconsin ex rel. Rizzo v. County Court of Kenosha County. Dominic H. Frinzi for petitioner. Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of. Wisconsin, for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.