Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1969 Cases
759 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Kaplysh v. Hershey
March 10, 1969. No. —. Misc. No. 1637, Kaplysh et al. v. Hershey et al.; and Schwartz v. Local Board No. 23 et al. Ralph Rudd for applicants Kaplysh et al. Solicitor General Griswold for respondents in each case in opposition.
Johnson v. Voyles
JOHNSON v. VOYLES, SHERIFF, et al. No. 429, Misc. Decided March 10, 1969. Crawford C. Martin, Attorney General of Texas, Nola White, First Assistant Attorney General, Robert C. Flowers and Allo B. Crow, Jr., Assistant Attorneys General, and
Jones v. California
JONES v. CALIFORNIA. No. 1072, Misc. Decided March 10, 1969.
Shaw v. Illinois
SHAW v. ILLINOIS. No. 665, Misc. Decided March 10, 1969. Gerald W. Getty and Marshall J. Hartman for petitioner. William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and John J. O’Toole, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Local 182, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board
LOCAL 182, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS OF AMERICA v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 958. Decided March 10, 1969. John T. Buckley for appellant. Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, D
Dunbar-Stanley Studios, Inc. v. City of Mobile
DUNBAR-STANLEY STUDIOS, INC. v. CITY OF MOBILE. No. 377. Decided March 10, 1969. J. Edward Thornton and Glen B. Hardymon for appellant. Barry Hess for appellee.
Alderman v. United States
ALDERMAN et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 133, Oct. Term, 1967. Certiorari denied October 9, 1967. Rehearing and certiorari granted and case decided January 29, 1968. Motion to modify argued May 2, 1968. Reargued October 14, 1968. Order of Janu
Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham
SHUTTLESWORTH v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM. No. 42. Argued November 18, 1968. Decided March 10, 1969. Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were James M. Nabrit III, Norman C. Amaker, Charles Stephen Ralston, Melvyn
Citizen Publishing Co. v. United States
CITIZEN PUBLISHING CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 243. Argued January 15, 1969. Decided March 10, 1969. Richard J. MacLaury argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Francis N. Marshall, Thomas J. Klitgaard, John L. Don
Gregory v. City of Chicago
GREGORY et al. v. CITY OF CHICAGO. No. 60. Argued December 10, 1968. Decided March 10, 1969. Marshall Patner argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Paul E. Goldstein. Raymond F. Simon argued the cause for respondent. W
Golden v. Zwickler
GOLDEN, ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF KINGS COUNTY v. ZWICKLER. No. 370. Argued January 16, 1969. Decided March 4, 1969. Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General of New York, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief
Holden v. Arnebergh
HOLDEN et al. v. ARNEBERGH, CITY ATTORNEY OF LOS ANGELES, et al. No. 945. Decided March 3, 1969. Burton Marks for appellants. Roger Arnebergh, pro se, and Robert B. Burns for appellees.
Black Unity League v. Miller
BLACK UNITY LEAGUE OF KENTUCKY et al. v. MILLER et al. No. 892. Decided March 3, 1969. William M. Kunstler, Arthur Kinoy, Robert Allen Sedler, and Morton Stavis for appellants. W. Scott Miller, Jr., pro se, and for other appellees.
Bokulich v. Jury Commission
BOKULICH et al. v. JURY COMMISSION OF GREENE COUNTY et al. No. 1255, Misc. Decided March 3, 1969. Morton Stavis, Arthur Kinoy, William M. Kunstler, Donald A. Jelinek, and Alvin Bronstein for appellants. MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General o
Utah v. United States
UTAH v. UNITED STATES. No. 31, Orig. Decided March 3, 1969. Vernon B. Romney, Attorney General of Utah, Robert B. Hansen, Deputy Attorney General, and Dallin W. Jensen, Assistant Attorney General, for plaintiff. Solicitor General Griswold,
United States v. Louisiana
UNITED STATES v. LOUISIANA et al. (LOUISIANA BOUNDARY CASE). No. 9, Orig. Argued October 14-15, 1968. Decided March 3, 1969. Victor A. Sachse and J. B. Miller, Special Assistant Attorneys General of Louisiana, argued the State of Louisiana’
United States v. Louisiana
UNITED STATES v. LOUISIANA et al. (TEXAS BOUNDARY CASE). No. 9, Orig. Argued November 18, 1968. Decided March 3, 1969. Louis F. Claiborne argued for the United States on its proposed supplemental decree as to the State of Texas. With him on
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad
No. 13. No. 667. No. 725. No. 726. No. 758. No. 763. No. 773. No. 790. No. 745, No. 782, No. 887, No. 998, No. 1062, Mise. Mise. Mise. Mise. Mise. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. et al. v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co. et al., Garner et ux
Williams v. Illinois
No. 1306, Mise. Williams v. Illinois.
Cannon v. New York
No. 1268, Mise. Cannon v. New York.
Bonicamp v. United States
No. 1153, Mise. Bonicamp v. United States. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
Stanek v. Civil Service Commission of Pittsburgh
No. 968. Stanek v. Civil Service Commission of City of Pittsburgh et al. Robert E. Kline for petitioner. Robert E. Dauer for respondents.
Gefen v. United States
No. 851. Gefen v. United States. Joseph M. Glickstein, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Walters, Loring W. Post, and Robert I. Waxman for the United States.
Inter National Bank of Miami v. Brock
No. 964. Inter National Bank of Miami v. Brock, Trustee, et al. Sam I. Silver for petitioner. Irving M. Wolff for respondents.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.