Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1969 Cases
759 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Blount v. United Federation of Postal Clerks
No. 290. Blount, Postmaster General v. United Federation of Postal Clerks, AFL-CIO, et al. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Ruckelshaus, Alan S. Rosenthal, and Ralph A. Fine for petitioner. Herbert S. Thatcher and Dona
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers
No. 477. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers et al. Dennis G. Lyons, Frank X. Friedmann, Jr., David M. Foster, John W. Weldon, and John S. Cox for petitioner. Allan Milledge and Richard L. Horn for respon
Lewis v. Montgomery
No. 560, Misc. Lewis et al. v. Montgomery, Director, California Department of Social Welfare, et al. Rubin Tepper and Steven J. Antler for appellants. Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Elizabeth Palmer and Jay S. Linderma
United States v. Jorn
No. 84. United States v. Jorn.
Boston & Maine Railroad v. United States
BOSTON & MAINE RAILROAD et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 343. Decided November 10, 1969 Carl E. Newton and M. Lauck Walton for appellants in No. 343. Lee Johnson, Attorney General of Oregon, Richard W. Sabin, Assistant Attorney General, a
King v. Greenblatt
KING v. GREENBLATT et al. No. 615, Misc. Decided November 10, 1969 Robert H. Quinn, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and John Wall and Edward W. Hanley III, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellees.
Maryland National Insurance v. Seventh Judicial District Court of Oklahoma County
MARYLAND NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. et al. v. SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF OKLAHOMA COUNTY et al. No. 482. Decided November 10, 1969 O. B. Martin for appellants.
Jolly v. Morgan County Junior College District
JOLLY v. MORGAN COUNTY JUNIOR COLLEGE DISTRICT et al. No. 453. Decided November 10, 1969 Albert W. Gebauer for appellant. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General of Colorado, and John E. Bush, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
National Labor Relations Board v. Clark's Gamble Corp.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. CLARK’S GAMBLE CORP., dba CLARK’S DISCOUNT DEPARTMENT STORE, et al. No. 439. Decided November 10, 1969 Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Leonard M. Wagman fo
Johnson v. State Bar of California
JOHNSON v. STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA et al. No. 434. Decided November 10, 1969
Aros-Gonzales v. United States
No. 649, Misc. Aros-Gonzales v. United States. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Roger A. Pauley for the United States.
Alexander v. Holmes County Board of Education
ALEXANDER et al. v. HOLMES COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION et al. No. 632. Argued October 23, 1969 Decided October 29, 1969 Jack Greenberg argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were James M. Nabrit III, Norman C. Amaker, Melvyn
Duval v. United States
No. 426, Misc. Duval v. United States. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Sidney M. Glazer for the United States.
Herndon v. United States
No. 482, Misc. Herndon v. United States. F. M. Apicella for petitioner. Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Wilson, Beatrice Rosenberg, and Edward Fenig for the United States.
James v. New York
No. 474, Misc. James v. New York.
McDonald v. New York
No. 443, Misc. McDonald v. New York. Frank S. Hogan and Michael R. Juviler for respondent.
Semidey v. McKendrick
No. 406, Misc. Semidey v. McKendrick, Warden.
Wartson v. United States
No. 385, Misc. Wartson v. United States. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
Manning v. New York
No. 150, Misc. Manning v. New York.
Oughton v. United States
No. 110, Misc. Oughton v. United States. Solicitor General Griswold for the United States.
International Ass'n of Machinists, District Lodge 94 v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 386. International Association of Machinists, District Lodge 94, AFL-CIO, et al. v. National Labor Relations Board et al. Herbert M. Ansell, Abe Levy, and Plato E. Papps for petitioners. Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Domini
Federal Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
No. 285. No. 532. Federal Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission; and Star Television, Inc., et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al. Edward J. Grenier, Jr., for petitioner in No. 285, and Benedict P. Cotto
Scalf v. Bennett
No. 407. Scalf v. Bennett, Warden. James R. McManus for petitioner.
Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.
No. 58. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. Alex Elson and Harold C. Heiss for petitioner. Harlan L. Hackbert for respondent. [For earlier order herein, see 395 U. S. 931.]
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.