Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1972 Cases
725 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Hawkins v. Virginia
No. 71-6169. Hawkins v. Virginia.
City of Hickory Hills v. Village of Bridgeview
No. 71-1375. City of Hickory Hills v. Village of Bridgeview et al.
Gosa v. Mayden
No. 71-6314. Gosa v. Mayden, Warden.
Jones v. United States
No. 71-6445. Jones v. United States.
McAllister v. Virginia
No. 71-5723. McAllister v. Virginia.
Turner v. Arkansas
TURNER v. ARKANSAS No. 71-1309. Decided June 19, 1972
Murel v. Baltimore City Criminal Court
MUREL et al. v. BALTIMORE CITY CRIMINAL COURT et al. No. 70-5276. Argued March 28-29, 1972 Decided June 19, 1972 Karl G. Feissner and Andrew E. Greenwald argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the brief were William L. Kaplan and Th
Shadwick v. City of Tampa
SHADWICK v. CITY OF TAMPA No. 71-5445. Argued April 10, 1972 Decided June 19, 1972 . Powell, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Daniel A. Rezneck argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Malory B. Frier. Gera
United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
UNITED STATES v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN et al. (PLAMONDON et al., REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST) . No. 70-153. Argued February 24, 1972 Decided June 19, 1972 Powell, J., delivered the opinion of the Cou
Flood v. Kuhn
FLOOD v. KUHN et al. No. 71-32. Argued March 20, 1972 Decided June 19, 1972 ■ BlacKMüN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Stewart and .RehNQUist, JJ.", joined,, and in all but Part I of which Burger, C. J., and White, J., Joi
McNeil v. Director, Patuxent Institution
McNEIL v. DIRECTOR, PATUXENT INSTITUTION No. 71-5144. Argued April 20, 1972 — Decided June 19, 1972 Marshall, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Douglas, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 252. E. Barrett Prettyman, Jr.,
Mitchum v. Foster
MITCHUM, dba BOOK MART v. FOSTER et al. No. 70-27. Argued December 13, 1971 Decided June 19, 1972 Stewart, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all members joined except Powell and Rehnquist, JJ., who took no part in the conside
Pennsylvania v. New York
PENNSYLVANIA v. NEW YORK et al. No. 40, Orig. Decided June 19, 1972 Decree entered June 19, 1972
Pennsylvania v. New York
PENNSYLVANIA v. NEW YORK et al. No. 40, Orig. Argued March 29, 1972 Decided June 19, 1972 Brennan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in'which-Burger, C, J., and Douglas, Stewart, White, and Marshall, JJ., joined. Powell, J., filed a d
Bennett v. Gravelle
June 13, 1972 No. 71-1372. Bennett et al. v. Gravelle et al.
Raysor v. South Carolina
No. 71-6514. Raysor et al. v. South Carolina.
Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Desny
No. 71-1334. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. Desny.
Ruiz-Juarez v. United States
No. 71-6499. Ruiz-Juarez v. United States.
Young v. Reed
No. 71-6427. Young v. Reed, Chairman, Board of Parole, et al.
Gellis v. City of Savannah
No. 71-1374. Gellis v. City of Savannah, Georgia, et al.
Fried v. United States
No. 71-1273. Fried v. United States.
Farrell v. Massachusetts
No. 71-1115. No. 71-1251. No. 71-1253. No. 71-1254. No. 71-6428. Farrell et al. v. Massachusetts; Local Finance Corp. v. Massachusetts; Woodcock v. Massachusetts; Liberty Loan Corp. v. Massachusetts; and Hanley v. Massachusetts.
United States v. Ash
No. 71-1255. United States v. Ash.
McDonnell v. Wolff
No. 71-6129. No. 71-6479. McDonnell v. Wolff, Warden, et al.; and Williams v. California.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.