Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1972 Cases
725 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Fein v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 7
FEIN v. SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM LOCAL BOARD NO. 7 OF YONKERS, NEW YORK, et al. No. 70-58. Argued October 12, 1971 Decided March 21, 1972 BlackmüN, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Burger, C. J., and BrenNAN and White, JJ.,
Dunn v. Blumstein
DUNN, GOVERNOR OF TENNESSEE, et al. v. BLUMSTEIN No. 70-13. Argued November 16, 1971 Decided March 21, 1972 MARSHALL, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Douglas, BreNNAn, Stewart, and White, JJ., joined. BlackmüN, J., filed an
Crow v. United States
No. 71-5828. Crow v. United States.
Malatesta v. United States
No. 71-5821. Malatesta v. United States.
Cartrade, Inc. v. Ford Dealers Advertising Ass'n of Southern California
No. 71-868. Cartrade, Inc. v. Ford Dealers Advertising Association of Southern California et al.
Swanson v. Arkansas
No. 71-5909. Swanson v. Arkansas.
Boulware v. New York
No. 71-5884. Boulware v. New York.
Young v. United States
No. 71-5865. Young v. United States.
Green v. Laird
No. 71-5844. Green v. Laird, Secretary of Defense, et al.
Bryant v. United States
No. 71-5827. No. 71-5996. No. 71-6050. Bryant v. United States; Feggett v. United States; and Burkhalter v. United States.
Mitchell v. California
No. 71-5535. Mitchell v. California.
Dubelko v. Dubelko
No. 71-934. Dubelko v. Dubelko.
Garcia-Guillern v. United States
No. 71-899. Garcia-Guillern v. United States.
C. D. Construction Corp. v. Commissioner
No. 71-852. C. D. Construction Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue.
Illinois v. Somerville
No. 71-692. Illinois v. Somerville.
Teitelbaum v. Stone
No. 71-1013. No. 71-5816. No. 71-5893. No. 71-5897. Teitelbaum v. Stone, Secretary of State of Florida; Paige v. Chambers, Chief Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals; DeBorde v. Hamilton, Chief Justice, Supreme Court of Washington, et al.; and Put
Laird v. Tatum
No. 71-288. Laird, Secretary of Defense, et al. v. Tatum et al.
Doe v. United States
No. A-926. Doe (Schwartz, Real Party In Interest) v. United States.
Salisbury v. Oregon
No. 71-5590. Salisbury v. Oregon.
Cruz v. Beto
CRUZ v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR No. 71-5552. Decided March 20, 1972
Willis v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
WILLIS v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA No. 70-5344. Argued February 28, 1972 Decided March 20, 1972 E. Freeman Leverett argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. A. Felton Jenkins, Jr., argued the cause for respondent. W
Rabe v. Washington
RABE v. WASHINGTON No. 71-247. Argued February 29, 1972 Decided March 20, 1972 William L. Dwyer argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Curtis Ludwig argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Herbert H. Davis. Bri
WHDH, Inc. v. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
March 17, 1972 No. A-937 (71-1170). No. A-937 (71-1171). WHDH, Inc. v. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit; and WHDH, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.
Pearl v. Laird
No. 71-883. Pearl v. Laird, Secretary of Defense, et al.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.