Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1975 Cases
661 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Bowen v. United States
BOWEN v. UNITED STATES No. 73-6848. Argued February 18, 1975 — Decided June 30, 1975 Michael D. Nasatir, by appointment of the Court, 419 U. S. 1017, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Jerald W. Newton. Mark L. Evan
United States v. Ortiz
UNITED STATES v. ORTIZ No. 73-2050. Argued February 18, 1975 — Decided June 30, 1975 Mark L. Evans argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Bork, Assistant Attorney General Petersen, Acting Assis
United States v. Brignoni-Ponce
UNITED STATES v. BRIGNONI-PONCE No. 74-114. Argued February 18, 1975 — Decided June 30, 1975 Deputy Solicitor General Frey argued the cause for the United States. On the briefs were Solicitor General Bork, Assistant Attorney General Peterse
Herring v. New York
HERRING v. NEW YORK No. 73-6587. Argued February 26, 1975 — Decided June 30, 1975 Diana A. Steele argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs was William E. Hellerstein. Gabriel I. Levy, Assistant Attorney General of New York, an
Faretta v. California
FARETTA v. CALIFORNIA No. 73-5772. Argued November 19, 1974 — Decided June 30, 1975 Jerome B. Falk, Jr., by appointment of the Court, 417 U. S. 906, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Roger S. Hanson. Howard J. Schw
Weinberger v. Salfi
WEINBERGER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE, et al. v. SALFI et al. No. 74-214. Argued March 19, 1975 — Decided June 26, 1975 Harriet S. Shapiro argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Solicitor General Bork, Assistan
United States v. National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
UNITED STATES v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SECURITIES DEALERS, INC., et al. No. 73-1701. Argued March 17, 1975 — Decided June 26, 1975 Gerald P. Norton argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Bork
Gordon v. New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
GORDON v. NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC., et al. No. 74-304. Argued March 25-26, 1975 — Decided June 26, 1975 I. Walton Bader argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Maximilian Bader. William Eldred Jackson argued the caus
Ivan Allen Co. v. United States
IVAN ALLEN CO. v. UNITED STATES No. 74-22. Argued April 14-15, 1975 — Decided June 26, 1975 Kirk McAlpin argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Herschel M. Bloom and Michael C. Buss. Assistant Attorney General Crampton
Brown v. Illinois
BROWN v. ILLINOIS No. 73-6650. Argued March 18, 1975 — Decided June 26, 1975 Robert P. Isaacson argued the cause for petitioner pro hac vice. With him on the brief were James J. Doherty and John T. Moran. Jayne A. Carr, Assistant Attorney G
O'Connor v. Donaldson
O’CONNOR v. DONALDSON No. 74-8. Argued January 15, 1975 — Decided June 26, 1975 Raymond W. Oearey, Assistant Attorney General of Florida, argued the cause for petitioner pro hac vice. With him on the briefs were Robert L. Shevin, Attorney G
United States v. Peltier
UNITED STATES v. PELTIER No. 73-2000. Argued February 18, 1975 — Decided June 25, 1975 William L. Patton argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Bork, Acting Assistant Attorney General Keeney, Mark L. Eva
Warth v. Seldin
WARTH et al. v. SELDIN et al. No. 73-2024. Argued March 17, 1975 — Decided June 25, 1975 Emmelyn Logan-Baldwin argued the cause for petitioners. With her on the briefs were Sanford Liebschutz and Michael Nelson. James M. Hartman argued the
Muniz v. Hoffman
MUNIZ et al. v. HOFFMAN, REGIONAL DIRECTOR, NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD No. 73-1924. Argued March 24, 1975 — Decided June 25, 1975 Victor J. Van Bourg argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs was Sheldon Otis. Solicitor G
Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody
ALBEMARLE PAPER CO. et al. v. MOODY et al. No. 74-389. Argued April 14, 1975 — Decided June 25, 1975 Francis V. Lowden, Jr., argued the cause for petitioners in No. 74-389. With him on the briefs were Gordon G. Busdicker, Charles O’Connell,
Preiser v. Newkirk
PREISER, COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES OF NEW YORK, et al. v. NEWKIRK No. 74-107. Argued January 20, 1975 — Decided June 25, 1975 Hillel Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General of New York, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on
Roe v. Norton
ROE et al. v. NORTON, COMMISSIONER OF WELFARE No. 73-6033. Argued February 25, 1975 — Decided June 24, 1975 Frank Cochran argued the cause and filed briefs for parent appellants. David N. Rosen argued the cause for children appellants. With
City of Richmond v. United States
CITY OF RICHMOND, VIRGINIA v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 74-201. Argued April 23, 1975 — Decided June 24, 1975 Charles S. Rhyne argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were David M. Dixon, Daniel T. Balfour, Conrad B. Mattox, J
Hicks v. Miranda
HICKS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ORANGE COUNTY, et al. v. MIRANDA, dba WALNUT PROPERTIES, et al. No. 74-156. Argued March 24, 1975 — Decided June 24, 1975 Oretta D. Sears, pro se, and Arlo E. Smith, Assistant Attorney General of California, argu
Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures
ABERDEEN & ROCKFISH RAILROAD CO. et al. v. STUDENTS CHALLENGING REGULATORY AGENCY PROCEDURES (SCRAP) et al. No. 73-1966. Argued March 26, 1975 — Decided June 24, 1975 Charles A. Horsky argued the cause for appellants in No. 73-1966. With hi
United States v. American Building Maintenance Industries
UNITED STATES v. AMERICAN BUILDING MAINTENANCE INDUSTRIES No. 73-1689. Argued April 22, 1975 — Decided June 24, 1975 Deputy Assistant Attorney General Wilson argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor Gene
Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration v. Robertson
ADMINISTRATOR, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, et al. v. ROBERTSON et al. No. 74-450. Argued April 15, 1975 — Decided June 24, 1975 Deputy Solicitor General Friedman argued the cause for petitioners. On the brief were Solicitor General Bor
Bragg v. Mid-America Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
No. 74-6109. No. 74-6122. No. 74-6357. Bragg v. Mid-America Federal Savings & Loan Assn., et al., 421 U. S. 933; Harrelson v. United States, 421 U. S. 968; and Roots v. Wainwright, Corrections Director, 421 U. S. 996.
Edwards Underground Water District v. Hills
No. 74-1310. Edwards Underground Water District et al. v. Hills, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, et al.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.