Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1975 Cases
661 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Marks v. Florida
No. A-664. Marks v. Florida.
Crete Carrier Corp. v. United States
No. 74-682. Crete Carrier Corp. v. United States et al.
Cassius v. Arizona
CASSIUS v. ARIZONA No. 74-5140. Argued January 21, 1975 Decided March 3, 1975 Frederick S. Klein argued the cause for petitioner pro hac vice. With him on the briefs was John M. Neis. William J. Schafer III argued the cause for respondent.
United States v. Guana-Sanchez
UNITED STATES v. GUANA-SANCHEZ No. 73-820. Argued January 14, 1975 Decided March 3, 1975 Paul L. Friedman argued the cause for the United States. On the brief were Solicitor General Bork, Assistant Attorney General Petersen, and Gerald P. N
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn
COX BROADCASTING CORP. et al. v. COHN No. 73-938. Argued November 11, 1974 Decided March 3, 1975 Kirk M. McAlpin argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Joseph R. Bankoff. Stephen A. Land argued the cause and filed brief
DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial District
DeCOTEAU, NATURAL MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND OF FEATHER et al. v. DISTRICT COUNTY COURT FOR THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT No. 73-1148. Argued December 16, 1974 Decided March 3, 1975 Bertram E. Hirsch argued the cause for petitioner in No. 73-1148
Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians v. Federal Power Commission
CHEMEHUEVI TRIBE OF INDIANS et al. v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION et al. No. 73-1380. Argued January 13, 1975 Decided March 3, 1975 Joseph J. Brecher argued the cause and filed a brief for the Chemehuevi Tribe of Indians et al. in all cases. D
Serfass v. United States
SERFASS v. UNITED STATES No. 73-1424. Argued December 9, 1974 Decided March 3, 1975 Harry A. Dower argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Barry N. Mosebach. Edward R. Korman argued the cause for the United States. With h
Caldwell v. City of New Orleans
February 26, 1975 No. A-690 (74-1062). Caldwell v. City of New Orleans.
Williams & Wilkins Co. v. United States
WILLIAMS & WILKINS CO v. UNITED STATES No. 73-1279. Argued December 17, 1974 Decided February 25, 1975 Alan Latman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Arthur J. Greenbaum and Martin F. Rickman. Solicitor General Bor
United States v. New Jersey State Lottery Commission
UNITED STATES et al. v. NEW JERSEY STATE LOTTERY COMMISSION No. 73-1471. Argued November 20, 1974 Decided February 25, 1975 Deputy Solicitor General Wallace argued the cause for petitioners. On the brief were Solicitor General Bork, Assista
United States v. Jenkins
UNITED STATES v. JENKINS No. 73-1513. Argued December 9, 1974 Decided February 25, 1975 Deputy Solicitor General Frey argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Bork, Assistant Attorney General Pete
United States v. Wilson
UNITED STATES v. WILSON No. 73-1395. Argued December 9, 1974 Decided February 25, 1975 Deputy Solicitor General Frey argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Bork, Assistant Attorney General Peter
Wood v. Strickland
WOOD et al. v. STRICKLAND et al. No. 73-1285. Argued October 16, 1974 Decided February 25, 1975 G. Ross Smith argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Herschel H. Friday. Ben Gore argued the cause and filed a brief for re
Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.
No. 73-1055. No. 73-1069. No. 73-1070. No. 73-1071. No. 73-1072. No. 74—313. No. 74-314. No. 74-407. No. 74-435. No. 74—629. No. 74-638. No. 74-5005. No. 74-5614. Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc., et al., Jo
Reamer v. Beall
No. 74-784. Reamer v. Beall, United States Attorney, et al.
Herman v. Arkansas
No. 74-717. Herman et al. v. Arkansas.
Cuyler v. Matthews
No. 74-573. Cuyler, Correctional Superintendent v. Matthews.
Qualls v. Briscoe
No. 74-5940. Qualls v. Briscoe et al.
Robinson v. United States
No. 74-5641. Robinson v. United States.
Miller v. Love
No. 74-5478. Miller v. Love.
General Steel Products Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 74-694. General Steel Products Co., a Division of Seng Co. v. National Labor Relations Board.
Richards v. North Carolina
No. 74-561. Richards v. North Carolina.
Steele v. Supreme Court of Colorado
No. 74-6019. Steele v. Supreme Court of Colorado et al. See also first note, supra, p. 940.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.