Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,002+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1976 Cases
688 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Tully v. Griffin, Inc.
TULLY et al. v. GRIFFIN, INC. No. 75-831. Argued October 4, 1976 Decided November 9, 1976 Thomas P. Zolezzi, Assistant Attorney General of New York, argued the cause for appellants.. With him on the brief were Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney G
Ginter v. Wisconsin
No. 76-5027. Ginter v. Wisconsin,
Olson Farms, Inc. v. United States
No. 76-342. Olson Farms, Inc. v. United States et al.
Porter County Chapter of the Izaak Walton League of America, Inc. v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
No. 76-291. Porter County Chapter of the Izaak Walton League of America, Inc., et al. v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission et al.
Zatko v. United States District Court for the Northern District
No. 76-5418. Zatko v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California.
Trotter v. United States
No. 76-5262. Trotter v. United States.
Payne v. United States
No. 76-5089. Payne v. United States.
Hickland v. Hickland
No. 76-386. Hickland v. Hickland.
Feldman v. United States
No. 76-113. Feldman v. United States.
Batterton v. Francis
No. 75-1181. Batterton, Secretary, Department of Human Resources of Maryland, et al. v. Francis et al.
Teamsters Local Union 657 v. Rodriguez
No. 76-651. No. 75-715. No. 75-718. Teamsters Local Union 657 v. Rodriguez et al.; Teamsters Local Union 657 v. Herrera et al.; and Teamsters Local Union 657 v. Resendis et al.; Southern Conference of Teamsters v. Rodriguez et al.; Southern
In re Disbarment of Plenty
No. D-75. In re Disbarment of Plenty.
In re Disbarment of Lundy
No. D-69. In re Disbarment of Lundy.
Hinshaw v. Superior Court
No. A-187 (76-326). Hinshaw v. Superior Court of California, County of Orange.
Massachusetts v. Feeney
MASSACHUSETTS et al. v. FEENEY No. 76-265. Decided November 8, 1976
Dawson v. United States
November 2, 1976 No. 76-5103. Dawson v. United States.
Parker Seal Co. v. Cummins
PARKER SEAL CO. v. CUMMINS No. 75-478. Argued October 12, 1976 Decided November 2, 1976 Leonard H. Becker argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Paul S. Ryerson. Thomas L. Hogan argued the cause for respondent. With him
Scott v. Kentucky Parole Board
SCOTT v. KENTUCKY PAROLE BOARD et al. No. 74-6438. Argued October 12, 1976 Decided November 2, 1976 Dean Hill Bivkin argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Robert Allen Sedler, Howard Lesnick, David Murrell, and Alvin
United States v. Foster Lumber Co.
UNITED STATES v. FOSTER LUMBER CO., INC. No. 74-799. Argued November 12, 1975- — -Reargued October 5, 1976— Decided November 2, 1976 Stuart A. Smith reargued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Bor
Smith v. Troyan
No. 75-734. No. 75-1501. No. 75-6922. No. 76-5030. No. 76-5078. Smith et al. v. Troyan et al., Ivey et al. v. United States, Mason et al. v. Belieu et al., Blackburn v. Florida, Manning v. Princeton Consumer Discount Co., Inc., et al.,
Wolery v. Ohio
No. 76-307. Wolery v. Ohio.
Nathan v. United States
No. 76-221. Nathan v. United States.
Air Line Employees Ass'n, International v. Evans
No. 75-1826. Air Line Employees Association, International v. Evans.
Jennings v. Dillard
No. 76-5363. Jennings v. Dillard et al.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.