Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1984 Cases
673 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Stafford v. Oklahoma
No. 83-5636. Stafford v. Oklahoma.
Arizona v. Rumsey
ARIZONA v. RUMSEY No. 83-226. Argued April 23, 1984 Decided May 29, 1984 William J. Schafer III argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Robert K. Corbin, Attorney General of Arizona. James R. Rummage, by appointment of th
United States v. Gouveia
UNITED STATES v. GOUVEIA et al. No. 83-128. Argued March 20, 1984 Decided May 29, 1984 Deputy Solicitor General Frey argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Lee, Assistant Attorney General Trott
United States v. Lorenzetti
UNITED STATES v. LORENZETTI No. 83-838. Argued April 23, 1984 Decided May 29, 1984 Carolyn F. Corwin argued the cause for the United States. With her on the briefs were Solicitor General Lee, Acting Assistant Attorney General Willard, Deput
Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P. C.
THREE AFFILIATED TRIBES OF THE FORT BERTHOLD RESERVATION v. WOLD ENGINEERING, P. C., et al. No. 82-629. Argued November 29, 1983 Decided May 29, 1984 Raymond Cross argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was John 0. Holm. De
Heckler v. Day
HECKLER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES v. DAY et al. No. 82-1371. Argued December 5, 1983 Decided May 22, 1984 Assistant Attorney General McGrath argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Lee, D
South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. Wunnicke
SOUTH-CENTRAL TIMBER DEVELOPMENT, INC. v. WUNNICKE, COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES OF ALASKA, et al. No. 82-1608. Argued February 29, 1984 Decided May 22, 1984 LeRoy E. DeVeaux argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the
Hishon v. King & Spalding
HISHON v. KING & SPALDING No. 82-940. Argued October 31, 1983 Decided May 22, 1984 Emmet J. Bondurant argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Deputy Solicitor General Bator argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae
Carter v. City of Birmingham
No. 83-6435. Carter v. City of Birmingham et al.
Orange County v. Wood
No. 83-1355. Orange County et al. v. Wood et al.
Cardenas v. United States
No. 83-6602. Cardenas v. United States.
Lucas v. Illinois
No. 83-6486. Lucas v. Illinois.
Consolidated X-Ray Service Corp. v. Bugher
No. 83-1737. Consolidated X-Ray Service Corp. v. Bugher et al.
Curley v. Curley
No. 83-1607. Curley v. Curley.
General Hospitals of Humana, Inc. v. Arkansas Statewide Health Coordinating Council
No. 83-1493. General Hospitals of Humana, Inc. v. Arkansas Statewide Health Coordinating Council et al.
Brandon v. Holt
No. 83-1622. Brandon et al. v. Holt, Director of Police for the City of Memphis, et al.
In re Disbarment of Graffagnino
No. D-432. In re Disbarment of Graffagnino.
Lauchli v. United States
No.-. Lauchli v. United States.
Ostrosky v. Alaska
May 21, 1984 No. 83-592. Ostrosky et al. v. Alaska.
Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.
HECKLER, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES v. COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, INC., et al. No. 83-56. Argued February 27, 1984 Decided May 21, 1984 Deputy Solicitor General Getter argued the cause for petitioner. With him
Waller v. Georgia
WALLER v. GEORGIA No. 83-321. Argued March 27, 1984 Decided May 21, 1984 Herbert Shafer argued the cause for petitioners in both cases. With him on the briefs were Charles Lister, Charles R. Smith, Burt Neuborne, and Charles S. Sims. Mary B
Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart
SEATTLE TIMES CO., dba THE SEATTLE TIMES, et al. v. RHINEHART et al. No. 82-1721. Argued February 21, 1984 Decided May 21, 1984 Evan L. Schwab argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were P. Cameron DeVore and Bruce E. H. J
Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United States
KIRBY FOREST INDUSTRIES, INC. v. UNITED STATES No. 82-1994. Argued February 22, 1984 Decided May 21, 1984 Joe G. Roady argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Harriet S. Shapiro argued the cause for the United States. With her on
Tate v. Rose
TATE, SUPERINTENDENT, CHILLICOTHE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE v. ROSE No. A-935 (83-1747). Decided May 19, 1984
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.