Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1989 Cases
648 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Broce
UNITED STATES v. BROCE et al. No. 87-1190. Argued October 4, 1988 Decided January 23, 1989 Roy T. Englert, Jr., argued the cause for the United States. With him on the briefs were Solicitor General Fried, Assistant Attorney General Rule, De
City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.
CITY OF RICHMOND v. J. A. CROSON CO. No. 87-998. Argued October 5, 1988 Decided January 23, 1989 John Payton argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Mark S. Hersh, Drew St. J. Carneal, Michael L. Sarahan, Michael K. Jack
Florida v. Riley
FLORIDA v. RILEY No. 87-764. Argued October 3, 1988 Decided January 23, 1989 Parker D. Thomson, Special Assistant Attorney General of Florida, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney Gene
Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.
ARGENTINE REPUBLIC v. AMERADA HESS SHIPPING CORP. et al. No. 87-1372. Argued December 6, 1988 Decided January 23, 1989 Bruno A. Ristau argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Joel E. Leising. Solicitor General Fried argu
Mistretta v. United States
MISTRETTA v. UNITED STATES No. 87-7028. Argued October 5, 1988 Decided January 18, 1989 Alan B. Morrison argued the cause for petitioner in No. 87-7028 and respondent in No. 87-1904. With him on the briefs were Patti A. Goldman, Raymond C.
Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. Lynn
SHEET METAL WORKERS’ INTERNATIONAL ASSN. et al. v. LYNN No. 86-1940. Argued November 7, 1988 Decided January 18, 1989 Donald W. Fisher argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Julius Reich, David M. Silberman, and Laure
Allegheny Pittsburgh Coal Co. v. County Commission
ALLEGHENY PITTSBURGH COAL CO. v. COUNTY COMMISSION OF WEBSTER COUNTY, WEST VIRGINIA No. 87-1303. Argued December 7, 1988 Decided January 18, 1989 E. Barrett Pretty man, Jr., argued the cause for petitioners in both cases. With him on the br
Business Computer Corp. v. U. S. Robotics, Inc.
No. 88-811. Business Computer Corp. et al. v. U. S. Robotics, Inc., et al.
Vasquez v. United States
No. 88-6097. Vasquez v. United States.
Stubblefield v. Wilkenson
No. 88-5941. Stubblefield v. Wilkenson et al.
Andrews v. United States
No. 88-5629. Andrews v. United States.
Reardon v. Miller
No. 88-894. Reardon et al. v. Miller, Judge, Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Camden County, et al.
McDowell v. Dynamics Corp. of America
No. 88-758. McDowell v. Dynamics Corporation of America.
In re Griffin
No. 88-6142. In re Griffin.
Peat Marwick Main & Co. v. Superior Court
No. 88-688. Peat Marwick Main & Co. v. Superior Court of California, County of Contra Costa, et al.
In re Disbarment of Silverman
No. D-758. In re Disbarment of Silverman.
Darlington v. United States
No. A-471. Darlington v. United States.
Tallman v. Kelley
No. 88-5910. Tallman v. Kelley.
Reed v. United Transportation Union
REED v. UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION et al. No. 87-1031. Argued November 2, 1988 Decided January 11, 1989 John W. Gresham argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Jonathan Wallas. Clinton J. Miller III argued the cause and
Duquesne Light Co. v. Barasch
DUQUESNE LIGHT CO. et al. v. BARASCH et al. No. 87-1160. Argued November 7, 1988 Decided January 11, 1989 Peter Buscemi argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Alan L. Reed, William E. Zeiter, John F. Stillmun III, Jame
Perry v. Leeke
PERRY v. LEEKE, COMMISSIONER, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al. No. 87-6325. Argued November 8, 1988 Decided January 10, 1989 W. Gaston Fairey, by appointment of the Court, 485 U. S. 1004, argued the cause and filed a brief f
Goldberg v. Sweet
GOLDBERG et al. v. SWEET, DIRECTOR, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, et al. No. 87-826. Argued October 12, 1988 Decided January 10, 1989 Walter A. Smith, Jr., argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs for appellants Goldberg et
Owens v. Okure
OWENS et al. v. OKURE No. 87-56. Argued November 1, 1988 Decided January 10, 1989 Peter H. Schiff, Deputy Solicitor General of New York, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Robert Abrams, Attorney General, O. Peter
Benson v. Bearb
No. 88-416. Benson v. Bearb et al.,
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.