Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1991 Cases
738 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Toibb v. Radloff
TOIBB v. RADLOFF No. 90-368. Argued April 22, 1991 Decided June 13, 1991 Peter M. Lieb argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Timothy B. Dyk and Jonathan W. Belsky. Stephen J. Marzen argued the cause for the United Sta
Burns v. United States
BURNS v. UNITED STATES No. 89-7260. Argued December 3, 1990 Decided June 13, 1991 Steven H. Goldblatt argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner. Stephen J. Marzen argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Act
Commissioner of Revenue v. Newsweek, Inc.
No. 90-273. No. 90-777. No. 90-910. No. 90-1215. No. 90-1383. No. 90-6538. No. 90-7093. No. 90-7385. No. 90-7457. Commissioner of Revenue of Tennessee v. Newsweek, Inc.; and Commissioner of Revenue of Tennessee v. Southern Living, Inc., et
Sterling v. Texas
No. 90-7480. No. 90-7745. No. 90-7770. Sterling v. Texas. Whitt v. California. Frank v. California.
Trojan Technologies, Inc. v. Pennsylvania
No. 90-1189. Trojan Technologies, Inc., et al. v. Pennsylvania et al.
Ramirez-Talavera v. United States
No. 90-7967. Ramirez-Talavera v. United States.
Arevalo-Navarro v. United States
No. 90-7863. Arevalo-Navarro v. United States.
Garrett v. Ohio
No. 90-7764. Garrett v. Ohio.
Zatko v. Marshall
No. 90-7685. Zatko v. Marshall, Warden.
Ferrell v. West Virginia
No. 90-7001. Ferrell v. West Virginia.
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Anderman/Smith Operating Co.
No. 90-1602. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. Anderman/Smith Operating Co.
Marshall v. United States
No. 90-929. Marshall v. United States.
Jenkins v. Barnett Bank
No. 90-1286. Jenkins, aka McGann v. Barnett Bank of Pensacola et al.,
In re Disbarment of Bruce
No. D-955. In re Disbarment of Bruce.
Gidney v. Camden County Prosecutor's Office
No. 90-5387. Gidney v. Camden County Prosecutor’s Office et al.
Gollust v. Mendell
GOLLUST et al. v. MENDELL et al. No. 90-659. Argued April 15, 1991 Decided June 10, 1991 Edwin B. Mishkin argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Victor I. Lewkow and Thomas G. Dagger. Irving Malchman argued the cause
Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Solimino
ASTORIA FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASSOCIATION v. SOLIMINO No. 89-1895. Argued April 17, 1991 Decided June 10, 1991 Paul J. Siegel argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Roger S. Kaplan and Anthony H. Atlas. Leonard N. Flam
Melkonyan v. Sullivan
MELKONYAN v. SULLIVAN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES No. 90-5538. Argued April 15, 1991 Decided June 10, 1991 Brian Wolfman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Alan B. Morrison, Patti A. Goldman, and John O
Johnson v. Home State Bank
JOHNSON v. HOME STATE BANK No. 90-693. Argued April 16, 1991 Decided June 10, 1991 W. Thomas Gilman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Martin R. Ufford, Patricia A. Gil-man, Edward J. Nazar, Laurie B. Williams, Mar
Otey v. Nebraska
June 6, 1991 No. 90-8120 (A-907). Otey v. Nebraska.
Chambers v. NASCO, Inc.
CHAMBERS v. NASCO, INC. No. 90-256. Argued February 27, 1991 Decided June 6, 1991 Mack E. Barham argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Robert E. Arceneaux and Russell T. Tritico. Joel I. Klein argued the cause for res
Connecticut v. Doehr
CONNECTICUT et al. v. DOEHR No. 90-143. Argued January 7, 1991 Decided June 6, 1991 Henry S. Cohn, Assistant Attorney General of Connecticut, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Clarine Nardi Riddle, Attorney Gener
Paiz v. United States
No. 90-6517. No. 90-6749. No. 90-7103. No. 90-7164. No. 90-7231. No. 90-7233. No. 90-7333. No. 90-7379. Paiz et al. v. United States, Ellery v. Grossmont Union High School District et al., Watts v. Wilder, Governor of Virginia, et al., Lyon
Gaskins v. McKellar
No. 90-7469. Gaskins v. McKellar, Warden, et al.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.