Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law · Pennsylvania 1797

Vasse v. Ball

March Term, 1797. Vasse versus Ball. THIS was an action on two Policies of Insurance for 28,000 dollars, upon the brig Salmon, and her cargo (both the property of the plaintiff, an American citizen) from Port-au-Paix to Philadelphia, in whi

2 U.S. 270 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Affirmed Tax Law 1797

Brown v. Van Braam

Brown versus Van Braam. ERROR from the Circuit Court, for the Diftritft of Rhode IJland. The cafe was as follows: On the 10th of March, 1792, Brown and Francis, merchants, of Providence, in Rhode IJland, drew four fets of bills of exchange

3 U.S. 344 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1797

Clerke v. Harwood

Clerke, Plaintiff in Error versus Harwood. `HIS was a writ of Error to the High Court of Appeals, of the State of Mary/and, to remove the pr~eedings in a caute, invojvlng a con1tru~tion ot tile treaty ot peace betWeen the United States and

3 U.S. 342 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1797

Huger v. South Carolina

Huger et al. versus South Carolina. BILL in Equity. A fubpcena had been iffued in this caufe, agreeably to the rule; and an affidavit of the fervice was now read, in which it was fet forth, that a copy had been delivered to the Attorney Gen

3 U.S. 339 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1797

Jennings v. Brig Perseverance

Jennings et al. Plaintiffs in Error, versus the Brig Perseverance, et al. THIS was a writ of error to remove the proceedings in an admiralty caufe from the Circuit Court for the dif-tncf of Rhode IJland. Soon after the decree was there' pro

3 U.S. 336 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1797

Symes's Lessee v. Irvine

Symes’s Lessee versus Irvine. THE Defendant’s Counsel moved to put off the trial of this cause (which was marked for the 20th of April) upon an affidavit setting forth, “ that A. B. a material witness, who lived at Carlisle, in Pennsylvania

2 U.S. 383 United States Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1797

Anonymous

ANONYMOUS. IN a cause marked for trial by Special Jury, nine Jurors only appeared; and the question arose, whether the Court (who wished to consider it with a view to establish a precedent) could award a tales, on the application of the Pla

2 U.S. 382 United States Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1797

Maxwell's Lessee v. Levy

Maxwell’s Lessee versus Levy.

2 U.S. 381 United States Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1797

Hancock Administrator v. Hillegas

Hancock Administrator versus Hillegas. THE defendant had given a Promissory Note to the plainttiff for a specific sum, on which, in different modes, there had been several partial payments. Before any settlement of accounts, however, the de

2 U.S. 380 United States Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1797

United States v. Parker

The United States versus Parker, et al. A Capias had issued in this cause against Daniel Parker, Win. Duer, and John Holker, returnable to April term 1792 ; and the Marshal then returned, Cepi Corpus as to Duer, (who gave, special bail in d

2 U.S. 373 United States Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt · Pennsylvania 1797

M'Carty v. Emlen

M'Carty versus Emlen. THIS action was brought to September term, 1789, by the plaintiff, as surviving partner of Cummings, to recover a debt due to the partnership. On the 4th of March 1793, the matters in dispute were referred; on the 21st

2 U.S. 277 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Outcome n/a · Pennsylvania 1797

Young v. Willing

Young versus Willing, et. al.

2 U.S. 276 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1796

Schermehorn v. L'Espenasse

October Term, 1796. Present, Wilson and Peters, Justices. Schermehorn versus L'Espenasse et al. BILL in Equity, This bill stated that on the 31st of December, 1790, the defendants, merchants of Amsterdam, had executed to the complainant (wh

2 U.S. 360 United States Circuit Court for the District of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury · Pennsylvania 1796

Waters v. Collot

September Term, 1796. Waters versus Collot. CAPIAS. Ingersoll and Lewis had obtained a rule upon the Plaintiff to shew his cause of action, and why the defendant should not be discharged on common bail. Dallas & Du Ponceau now shewed cause.

2 U.S. 247 Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1796

Del Gol v. Arnold

Del Gol versus Arnold. A LIBEL was filed in the Diftrifl Court of South Carolina, by the Defendant in error, againft Del Col, and others, the owners of a French privateer called La Montague, and of the íhip Jndujlry and her cargo, a prize t

3 U.S. 333 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1796

Hills v. Ross

Hills et al. versus Ross. THIS caufe came again before the court (fee Ant.p. 1847 and after a difcuffion upon the merits, it became a quef-' feion, whether there had been a regular appearance of.the par-, ties to the fuit below ? The libel

3 U.S. 331 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed 1796

Wiscart v. Dauchy

Wiscart, et al. Plaintiffs in Error, versus Dauchy, Defendant in Error. ERROR to the Circuit for the Virginia Diftrift. ' The original proceeding was on the Equity fide of the Court below, where the Defendant in Error had filed a bill, char

3 U.S. 321 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1796

Grayson v. Virginia

Grayson versus Virginia. BILL in Equity. 'The fervice of .the fubpasna in this caía being proved, Leivis moved, at the laft Termj that a Dif-tritigas might be awarded, in order to compel the State to enter an appearance ; arguing, from the

3 U.S. 320 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1796

Moodie v. The Ship Phoebe Anne

Moodie versus The Ship Phoebe Anne. rom the Circuit Court for the Diftriift of South The Phoebe Anne, a Britijh veflel, had been captured by a French privateer, and fent into Chárlejion. The Britijh Coiir ful filed a Libel,, claiming reftit

3 U.S. 319 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Tax Law 1796

Olney v. Arnold

Olney versus Arnold. THIS was a wat of error on a judgment given in the Sit- . perior Court of Judicature, court of áflize arid jail deli-livery, for the county oiProvidence, in the State of Rhode IJl-t and; and the cafe, appearing, on the

3 U.S. 308 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1796

Moodie v. The Ship Alfred

Moodie versus the Ship Alfred. HE allegation in this cafe, as fupported by the evidence, ⅝ was, that the privateer, which took the Britijh prize in queftion, had been built in New Yotk, with theexprefs view of being employed as a privateer,

3 U.S. 307 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1796

Arcambel v. Wiseman

Arcambel versus Wiseman. THE decree of the Circuit Court, for the Diftritft of Rhode Ifland, was affirmed-in this caufe, without argument, the principal queftion, which it involved, having been juft decided upon the difcuffion of another wr

3 U.S. 306 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1796

Hunter v. Fairfax's Devisee

Hunter versus Fairfax's Devisee. BY order of the court, a letter from the Plaintiff in error, dated the 29th of July, 1796, and directed to the Clerk, was read. The letter ftated, “ that the Plaintiff had employ-n éd Mr/ Campbell\ of Virgin

3 U.S. 305 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1796

Cotton v. Wallace

Cotton Plaintiff in Error, versus Wallace. WRIT of Error to thz Circuit Court, for the DiftricS of Georgia, to remove the proceedings .and decree in an Admiralty Caufe. At the laft Term the Decree of the Circuit Court had been affirmed, wit

3 U.S. 302 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion